XCJD.DE vs. IQQJ.DE
XCJD.DE (Xtrackers MSCI Japan Climate Transition UCITS ETF) and IQQJ.DE (iShares MSCI Japan UCITS ETF (Dist)) are both Japan Equities funds - XCJD.DE tracks the MSCI Japan Select Sustainability Screened CTB while IQQJ.DE tracks the MSCI Japan. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, XCJD.DE returned 10.79%/yr vs 15.45%/yr for IQQJ.DE. With a 0.95 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. XCJD.DE charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for IQQJ.DE.
Performance
XCJD.DE vs. IQQJ.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XCJD.DE achieves a 14.53% return, which is significantly lower than IQQJ.DE's 16.83% return.
XCJD.DE
- 1D
- -0.41%
- 1M
- 5.00%
- YTD
- 14.53%
- 6M
- 13.84%
- 1Y
- 25.82%
- 3Y*
- 10.79%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IQQJ.DE
- 1D
- -14.69%
- 1M
- 5.85%
- YTD
- 16.83%
- 6M
- 16.70%
- 1Y
- 30.57%
- 3Y*
- 15.45%
- 5Y*
- 9.84%
- 10Y*
- 8.94%
XCJD.DE vs. IQQJ.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
XCJD.DE Xtrackers MSCI Japan Climate Transition UCITS ETF | 14.53% | 10.16% | 6.89% | 6.37% |
IQQJ.DE iShares MSCI Japan UCITS ETF (Dist) | 16.83% | 12.69% | 13.58% | 8.37% |
Correlation
The correlation between XCJD.DE and IQQJ.DE is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 10, 2023 | 0.95 |
The correlation between XCJD.DE and IQQJ.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XCJD.DE vs. IQQJ.DE — Risk / Return Rank
XCJD.DE
IQQJ.DE
XCJD.DE vs. IQQJ.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI Japan Climate Transition UCITS ETF (XCJD.DE) and iShares MSCI Japan UCITS ETF (Dist) (IQQJ.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XCJD.DE | IQQJ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.51 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.72 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.28 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.44 | 2.07 | +0.37 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.19 | 9.16 | -0.98 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XCJD.DE | IQQJ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.38 | 0.87 | +0.51 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.46 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.47 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.69 | 0.28 | +0.41 |
Drawdowns
XCJD.DE vs. IQQJ.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XCJD.DE drawdown since its inception was -16.48%, smaller than the maximum IQQJ.DE drawdown of -54.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XCJD.DE and IQQJ.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XCJD.DE | IQQJ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.48% | -54.99% | +38.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.52% | -14.69% | +4.17% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.48% | -16.72% | +0.24% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -19.40% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -28.02% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.41% | -14.69% | +14.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.78% | -16.84% | +13.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.15% | 3.33% | -0.18% |
Volatility
XCJD.DE vs. IQQJ.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI Japan Climate Transition UCITS ETF (XCJD.DE) is 3.70%, while iShares MSCI Japan UCITS ETF (Dist) (IQQJ.DE) has a volatility of 30.30%. This indicates that XCJD.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IQQJ.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XCJD.DE | IQQJ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.70% | 30.30% | -26.60% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.79% | 33.04% | -18.25% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.65% | 34.82% | -16.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.01% | 21.13% | -4.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.01% | 18.82% | -1.81% |
XCJD.DE vs. IQQJ.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
XCJD.DE has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than IQQJ.DE's 0.12% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XCJD.DE vs. IQQJ.DE - Dividend Comparison
XCJD.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.21%, less than IQQJ.DE's 1.52% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IQQJ.DE iShares MSCI Japan UCITS ETF (Dist) | 1.52% | 1.79% | 1.48% | 1.42% | 1.76% | 1.16% | 1.40% | 1.41% | 1.44% | 1.23% | 1.21% | 0.57% |
XCJD.DE Xtrackers MSCI Japan Climate Transition UCITS ETF | 1.21% | 1.36% | 2.05% | 1.42% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.91, XCJD.DE and IQQJ.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, IQQJ.DE is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IQQJ.DE is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for XCJD.DE.
XCJD.DE tracks MSCI Japan Select Sustainability Screened CTB, while IQQJ.DE tracks MSCI Japan. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for XCJD.DE and 0.12% for IQQJ.DE.
Find the right allocation for XCJD.DE and IQQJ.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer