PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XCHP.TO vs. XAW.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XCHP.TO vs. XAW.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in iShares Semiconductor Index ETF (XCHP.TO) and iShares Core MSCI All Country World ex Canada Index ETF (XAW.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XCHP.TO achieves a 106.85% return, which is significantly higher than XAW.TO's 13.70% return.


XCHP.TO

1D
2.19%
1M
35.96%
YTD
106.85%
6M
98.47%
1Y
192.43%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

XAW.TO

1D
-0.37%
1M
7.13%
YTD
13.70%
6M
12.70%
1Y
30.51%
3Y*
21.73%
5Y*
13.96%
10Y*
13.22%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XCHP.TO vs. XAW.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
XCHP.TO
iShares Semiconductor Index ETF
106.85%33.58%21.73%15.27%
XAW.TO
iShares Core MSCI All Country World ex Canada Index ETF
13.70%15.87%26.31%4.05%

Correlation

The correlation between XCHP.TO and XAW.TO is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.71

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 15, 2023

0.68

The correlation between XCHP.TO and XAW.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.71 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XCHP.TO vs. XAW.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XCHP.TO
XCHP.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
XCHP.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XCHP.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
XCHP.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
XCHP.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
XCHP.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank

XAW.TO
XAW.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
XAW.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XAW.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
XAW.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
XAW.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
XAW.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XCHP.TO vs. XAW.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Semiconductor Index ETF (XCHP.TO) and iShares Core MSCI All Country World ex Canada Index ETF (XAW.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XCHP.TOXAW.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+3.35

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.00

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.75

1.48

+0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

13.99

3.76

+10.23

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

49.96

15.15

+34.81

XCHP.TO vs. XAW.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XCHP.TO Sharpe Ratio is 5.86, which is higher than the XAW.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XCHP.TO and XAW.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XCHP.TOXAW.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.86

2.50

+3.35

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.88

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.91

0.78

+1.12

Drawdowns

XCHP.TO vs. XAW.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XCHP.TO drawdown since its inception was -38.95%, which is greater than XAW.TO's maximum drawdown of -27.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XCHP.TO and XAW.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XCHP.TOXAW.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.95%

-27.32%

-11.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.22%

-8.16%

-6.06%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.66%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.02%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.37%

+0.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.67%

-3.91%

-4.76%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.95%

2.02%

+1.93%

Volatility

XCHP.TO vs. XAW.TO - Volatility Comparison

iShares Semiconductor Index ETF (XCHP.TO) has a higher volatility of 13.24% compared to iShares Core MSCI All Country World ex Canada Index ETF (XAW.TO) at 4.21%. This indicates that XCHP.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XAW.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XCHP.TOXAW.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.24%

4.21%

+9.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

26.74%

9.85%

+16.89%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

34.06%

12.25%

+21.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

38.53%

13.56%

+24.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

38.53%

15.12%

+23.41%

XCHP.TO vs. XAW.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

XCHP.TO has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than XAW.TO's 0.22% expense ratio.


Dividends

XCHP.TO vs. XAW.TO - Dividend Comparison

XCHP.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.21%, less than XAW.TO's 1.17% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
XAW.TO
iShares Core MSCI All Country World ex Canada Index ETF
1.17%1.33%1.61%1.71%1.79%1.77%1.49%2.02%2.29%1.92%1.80%1.83%
XCHP.TO
iShares Semiconductor Index ETF
0.21%0.43%0.29%0.17%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


XCHP.TO and XAW.TO have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XAW.TO is cheaper at 0.22% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XAW.TO is cheaper with a 0.22% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for XCHP.TO.

XCHP.TO is categorized as Semiconductors, while XAW.TO is Global Equities. XCHP.TO tracks NYSE Semiconductor Index, while XAW.TO tracks Morningstar Gbl GR CAD. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for XCHP.TO and 0.22% for XAW.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XCHP.TO and XAW.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer