PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XCHA.L vs. M9SV.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XCHA.L vs. M9SV.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers CSI 300 Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XCHA.L) and Market Access STOXX China A Minimum Variance UCITS ETF (M9SV.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

XCHA.L is traded in USD, while M9SV.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the M9SV.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XCHA.L achieves a 11.44% return, which is significantly higher than M9SV.L's -2.17% return.


XCHA.L

1D
-0.57%
1M
2.27%
YTD
11.44%
6M
15.20%
1Y
41.84%
3Y*
15.51%
5Y*
2.07%
10Y*
9.32%

M9SV.L

1D
-0.78%
1M
-2.60%
YTD
-2.17%
6M
-0.99%
1Y
6.61%
3Y*
9.35%
5Y*
3.80%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XCHA.L vs. M9SV.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
XCHA.L
Xtrackers CSI 300 Swap UCITS ETF 1C
11.44%30.08%16.02%-11.00%-24.25%3.24%45.85%40.57%-5.41%
M9SV.L
Market Access STOXX China A Minimum Variance UCITS ETF
-2.17%8.52%28.14%6.19%-16.41%6.55%26.49%9.91%-7.07%

Correlation

The correlation between XCHA.L and M9SV.L is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.57

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.56

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 7, 2018

0.67

The correlation between XCHA.L and M9SV.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.56 (3 years) to 0.67 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

XCHA.L vs. M9SV.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XCHA.L
M9SV.L

Technology

26.9%
4.9%

Financial Services

20.0%
24.5%

Industrials

16.5%
18.4%

Basic Materials

10.3%
2.4%

Consumer Defensive

7.2%
6.8%

Consumer Cyclical

6.5%
11.9%

Healthcare

4.7%
4.8%

Energy

3.0%
7.4%

Utilities

2.8%
13.9%

Communication Services

1.6%
4.5%

Real Estate

0.5%
0.5%

Technology

XCHA.L
26.9%
M9SV.L
4.9%

Financial Services

XCHA.L
20.0%
M9SV.L
24.5%

Industrials

XCHA.L
16.5%
M9SV.L
18.4%

Basic Materials

XCHA.L
10.3%
M9SV.L
2.4%

Consumer Defensive

XCHA.L
7.2%
M9SV.L
6.8%

Consumer Cyclical

XCHA.L
6.5%
M9SV.L
11.9%

Healthcare

XCHA.L
4.7%
M9SV.L
4.8%

Energy

XCHA.L
3.0%
M9SV.L
7.4%

Utilities

XCHA.L
2.8%
M9SV.L
13.9%

Communication Services

XCHA.L
1.6%
M9SV.L
4.5%

Real Estate

XCHA.L
0.5%
M9SV.L
0.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XCHA.L vs. M9SV.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XCHA.L
XCHA.L Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
XCHA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XCHA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
XCHA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
XCHA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
XCHA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

M9SV.L
M9SV.L Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
M9SV.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
M9SV.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
M9SV.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
M9SV.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
M9SV.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XCHA.L vs. M9SV.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers CSI 300 Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XCHA.L) and Market Access STOXX China A Minimum Variance UCITS ETF (M9SV.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XCHA.LM9SV.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.98

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.62

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.10

+0.36

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.69

0.82

+5.86

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

19.41

2.56

+16.85

XCHA.L vs. M9SV.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XCHA.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.51, which is higher than the M9SV.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XCHA.L and M9SV.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XCHA.LM9SV.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.51

0.53

+1.98

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.09

0.18

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.41

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.29

0.32

-0.03

Drawdowns

XCHA.L vs. M9SV.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XCHA.L drawdown since its inception was -50.88%, which is greater than M9SV.L's maximum drawdown of -30.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XCHA.L and M9SV.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XCHA.LM9SV.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-50.88%

-30.47%

-20.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.23%

-7.99%

+1.76%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.84%

-23.59%

-3.25%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.18%

-30.22%

-9.96%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.93%

-9.65%

+7.72%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-24.58%

-9.94%

-14.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.15%

2.58%

-0.43%

Volatility

XCHA.L vs. M9SV.L - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers CSI 300 Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XCHA.L) has a higher volatility of 6.13% compared to Market Access STOXX China A Minimum Variance UCITS ETF (M9SV.L) at 3.38%. This indicates that XCHA.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than M9SV.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XCHA.LM9SV.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.13%

3.38%

+2.75%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.46%

8.18%

+3.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.60%

12.40%

+4.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.39%

20.84%

+1.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.69%

21.00%

+1.69%

XCHA.L vs. M9SV.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XCHA.L has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than M9SV.L's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

XCHA.L vs. M9SV.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither XCHA.L nor M9SV.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


XCHA.L and M9SV.L have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, M9SV.L is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

M9SV.L is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for XCHA.L.

Both ETFs track MSCI China A Onshore NR CNY. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and China Post Global. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for XCHA.L and 0.45% for M9SV.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XCHA.L and M9SV.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer