M9SV.L vs. GOLB.L
Compare and contrast key facts about Market Access STOXX China A Minimum Variance UCITS ETF (M9SV.L) and Market Access NYSE Arca Gold Bugs UCITS ETF (GOLB.L).
M9SV.L and GOLB.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. M9SV.L is a passively managed fund by China Post Global that tracks the performance of the MSCI China A Onshore NR CNY. It was launched on Jun 7, 2018. GOLB.L is a passively managed fund by China Post Global that tracks the performance of the EMIX Global Mining Global Gold TR USD. It was launched on Jan 11, 2007. Both M9SV.L and GOLB.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
M9SV.L vs. GOLB.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
M9SV.L vs. GOLB.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
M9SV.L Market Access STOXX China A Minimum Variance UCITS ETF | -2.53% | 0.90% | 30.31% | 0.87% | -6.40% | 7.53% | 22.73% | 5.67% | -5.57% |
GOLB.L Market Access NYSE Arca Gold Bugs UCITS ETF | 18.61% | 138.45% | 14.05% | 0.34% | 1.34% | -14.65% | 84.95% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, M9SV.L achieves a -2.53% return, which is significantly lower than GOLB.L's 18.61% return.
M9SV.L
- 1D
- 0.13%
- 1M
- -0.27%
- YTD
- -2.53%
- 6M
- 0.32%
- 1Y
- 4.80%
- 3Y*
- 7.42%
- 5Y*
- 4.45%
- 10Y*
- —
GOLB.L
- 1D
- 7.10%
- 1M
- -14.22%
- YTD
- 18.61%
- 6M
- 34.04%
- 1Y
- 119.37%
- 3Y*
- 44.09%
- 5Y*
- 26.04%
- 10Y*
- 17.87%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
M9SV.L vs. GOLB.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
M9SV.L has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than GOLB.L's 0.65% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
M9SV.L vs. GOLB.L — Risk / Return Rank
M9SV.L
GOLB.L
M9SV.L vs. GOLB.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Market Access STOXX China A Minimum Variance UCITS ETF (M9SV.L) and Market Access NYSE Arca Gold Bugs UCITS ETF (GOLB.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| M9SV.L | GOLB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.35 | 2.85 | -2.49 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.58 | 3.00 | -2.42 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | 1.42 | -0.35 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.62 | 4.35 | -3.73 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.82 | 15.54 | -13.72 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| M9SV.L | GOLB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.35 | 2.85 | -2.49 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.22 | 0.78 | -0.56 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.53 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.30 | 0.17 | +0.14 |
Correlation
The correlation between M9SV.L and GOLB.L is 0.08, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
M9SV.L vs. GOLB.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither M9SV.L nor GOLB.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
M9SV.L vs. GOLB.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum M9SV.L drawdown since its inception was -21.64%, smaller than the maximum GOLB.L drawdown of -84.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for M9SV.L and GOLB.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| M9SV.L | GOLB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.64% | -84.29% | +62.65% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.71% | -28.11% | +19.40% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.64% | -37.60% | +15.96% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -44.07% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.48% | -14.37% | +1.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.77% | -49.68% | +41.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.98% | 7.87% | -4.89% |
Volatility
M9SV.L vs. GOLB.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Market Access STOXX China A Minimum Variance UCITS ETF (M9SV.L) is 4.33%, while Market Access NYSE Arca Gold Bugs UCITS ETF (GOLB.L) has a volatility of 17.41%. This indicates that M9SV.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GOLB.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| M9SV.L | GOLB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.33% | 17.41% | -13.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.91% | 35.00% | -26.09% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.55% | 41.70% | -28.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.07% | 33.38% | -13.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.67% | 33.93% | -13.26% |