PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XCHA.DE vs. PRAJ.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XCHA.DE vs. PRAJ.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers CSI 300 Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XCHA.DE) and Amundi Prime Japan UCITS ETF (PRAJ.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XCHA.DE achieves a 12.47% return, which is significantly lower than PRAJ.DE's 15.60% return.


XCHA.DE

1D
-0.47%
1M
2.18%
YTD
12.47%
6M
14.40%
1Y
39.55%
3Y*
12.45%
5Y*
3.01%
10Y*
9.08%

PRAJ.DE

1D
-0.27%
1M
3.19%
YTD
15.60%
6M
15.73%
1Y
30.22%
3Y*
15.18%
5Y*
9.98%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XCHA.DE vs. PRAJ.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
XCHA.DE
Xtrackers CSI 300 Swap UCITS ETF 1C
12.47%14.69%24.35%-14.26%-19.18%13.33%38.41%
PRAJ.DE
Amundi Prime Japan UCITS ETF
15.60%12.84%13.73%16.27%-11.68%10.20%4.34%

Correlation

The correlation between XCHA.DE and PRAJ.DE is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.26

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.22

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.23

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 29, 2020

0.26

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XCHA.DE vs. PRAJ.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XCHA.DE
XCHA.DE Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
XCHA.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XCHA.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
XCHA.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
XCHA.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
XCHA.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank

PRAJ.DE
PRAJ.DE Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
PRAJ.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRAJ.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRAJ.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
PRAJ.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRAJ.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XCHA.DE vs. PRAJ.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers CSI 300 Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XCHA.DE) and Amundi Prime Japan UCITS ETF (PRAJ.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XCHA.DEPRAJ.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.11

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.30

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.38

2.97

-0.59

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.62

9.64

-5.02

XCHA.DE vs. PRAJ.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XCHA.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.48, which is comparable to the PRAJ.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XCHA.DE and PRAJ.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XCHA.DEPRAJ.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.48

1.57

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.13

0.60

-0.47

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.39

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.31

0.51

-0.20

Drawdowns

XCHA.DE vs. PRAJ.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XCHA.DE drawdown since its inception was -52.27%, which is greater than PRAJ.DE's maximum drawdown of -29.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XCHA.DE and PRAJ.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XCHA.DEPRAJ.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-52.27%

-29.64%

-22.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.43%

-9.73%

-6.70%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.32%

-16.80%

-9.52%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.07%

-18.65%

-18.42%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.81%

-0.27%

-1.54%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-22.73%

-6.07%

-16.66%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.48%

3.01%

+5.47%

Volatility

XCHA.DE vs. PRAJ.DE - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers CSI 300 Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XCHA.DE) has a higher volatility of 5.10% compared to Amundi Prime Japan UCITS ETF (PRAJ.DE) at 3.41%. This indicates that XCHA.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PRAJ.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XCHA.DEPRAJ.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.10%

3.41%

+1.69%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.37%

14.72%

-4.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.51%

18.48%

+8.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.27%

16.53%

+6.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.20%

17.88%

+5.32%

XCHA.DE vs. PRAJ.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

XCHA.DE has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than PRAJ.DE's 0.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

XCHA.DE vs. PRAJ.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither XCHA.DE nor PRAJ.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


XCHA.DE and PRAJ.DE have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, PRAJ.DE is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

PRAJ.DE is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for XCHA.DE.

XCHA.DE is categorized as China Equities, while PRAJ.DE is Japan Equities. XCHA.DE tracks MSCI China A Onshore NR CNY, while PRAJ.DE tracks Solactive GBS Japan Large & Mid Cap. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for XCHA.DE and 0.05% for PRAJ.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XCHA.DE and PRAJ.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer