PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XCHA.DE vs. EXXW.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XCHA.DE vs. EXXW.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers CSI 300 Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XCHA.DE) and iShares Dow Jones Asia Pacific Select Dividend 50 UCITS ETF (DE) (EXXW.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XCHA.DE achieves a 12.37% return, which is significantly lower than EXXW.DE's 17.35% return. Over the past 10 years, XCHA.DE has outperformed EXXW.DE with an annualized return of 8.22%, while EXXW.DE has yielded a comparatively lower 6.56% annualized return.


XCHA.DE

1D
-0.27%
1M
-0.32%
6M
8.98%
YTD
12.37%
1Y
35.81%
3Y*
13.43%
5Y*
3.31%
10Y*
8.22%

EXXW.DE

1D
0.73%
1M
3.23%
6M
12.56%
YTD
17.35%
1Y
33.75%
3Y*
19.87%
5Y*
11.66%
10Y*
6.56%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XCHA.DE vs. EXXW.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XCHA.DE
Xtrackers CSI 300 Swap UCITS ETF 1C
12.37%14.66%24.36%-14.24%-19.19%13.31%31.26%44.91%-21.79%18.93%
EXXW.DE
iShares Dow Jones Asia Pacific Select Dividend 50 UCITS ETF (DE)
17.35%15.96%13.24%9.53%3.57%13.07%-18.75%18.30%-10.49%2.63%

Correlation

The correlation between XCHA.DE and EXXW.DE is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.24

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.29

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.34

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.40

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2012

0.40

The correlation between XCHA.DE and EXXW.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.24 (1 year) to 0.40 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XCHA.DE vs. EXXW.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XCHA.DE
XCHA.DE Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
XCHA.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XCHA.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
XCHA.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
XCHA.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
XCHA.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

EXXW.DE
EXXW.DE Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
EXXW.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EXXW.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
EXXW.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
EXXW.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
EXXW.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XCHA.DE vs. EXXW.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers CSI 300 Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XCHA.DE) and iShares Dow Jones Asia Pacific Select Dividend 50 UCITS ETF (DE) (EXXW.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XCHA.DEEXXW.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.64

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.18

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.49

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.39

5.30

+0.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.95

17.21

-3.25

XCHA.DE vs. EXXW.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XCHA.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.02, which is comparable to the EXXW.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XCHA.DE and EXXW.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XCHA.DE vs. EXXW.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XCHA.DE drawdown since its inception was -52.27%, smaller than the maximum EXXW.DE drawdown of -66.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XCHA.DE and EXXW.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XCHA.DEEXXW.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-52.27%

-66.89%

+14.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.61%

-6.34%

-0.27%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.34%

-20.12%

-6.22%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.05%

-20.12%

-16.93%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.54%

-41.87%

+3.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.10%

0.00%

-5.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-24.36%

-11.72%

-12.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.56%

1.96%

+0.60%

Volatility

XCHA.DE vs. EXXW.DE - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers CSI 300 Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XCHA.DE) has a higher volatility of 8.41% compared to iShares Dow Jones Asia Pacific Select Dividend 50 UCITS ETF (DE) (EXXW.DE) at 2.67%. This indicates that XCHA.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EXXW.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XCHA.DEEXXW.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.41%

2.67%

+5.74%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.00%

9.50%

+3.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.64%

12.62%

+5.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.42%

13.48%

+7.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.24%

15.74%

+6.50%

XCHA.DE vs. EXXW.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

XCHA.DE has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than EXXW.DE's 0.31% expense ratio.


Dividends

XCHA.DE vs. EXXW.DE - Dividend Comparison

XCHA.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EXXW.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.09%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EXXW.DE
iShares Dow Jones Asia Pacific Select Dividend 50 UCITS ETF (DE)
4.09%4.60%5.32%5.98%7.15%5.54%4.64%5.67%5.31%7.91%4.27%5.52%
XCHA.DE
Xtrackers CSI 300 Swap UCITS ETF 1C
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


XCHA.DE and EXXW.DE have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, EXXW.DE is cheaper at 0.31% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

EXXW.DE is cheaper with a 0.31% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for XCHA.DE.

XCHA.DE is categorized as China Equities, while EXXW.DE is Asia Pacific Equities. XCHA.DE tracks MSCI China A Onshore NR CNY, while EXXW.DE tracks Dow Jones Asia/Pacific Select Dividend 50. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for XCHA.DE and 0.31% for EXXW.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XCHA.DE and EXXW.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer