XCH.TO vs. XDIV.TO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

XCH.TO (iShares China Index ETF) and XDIV.TO (iShares Core MSCI Canadian Quality Dividend Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XCH.TO is a China Equities fund tracking the Morningstar China GR CAD, while XDIV.TO is a Dividend fund tracking the MSCI Canada High Dividend Yield 10% Security Capped Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XCH.TO returned -0.79%/yr vs 16.42%/yr for XDIV.TO. At a 0.30 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XCH.TO charges 0.87%/yr vs 0.11%/yr for XDIV.TO.

Performance

XCH.TO vs. XDIV.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in iShares China Index ETF (XCH.TO) and iShares Core MSCI Canadian Quality Dividend Index ETF (XDIV.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XCH.TO achieves a -6.01% return, which is significantly lower than XDIV.TO's 19.17% return.

XCH.TO

• 1D: -1.76%
• 1M: -0.68%
• YTD: -6.01%
• 6M: -8.84%
• 1Y: 2.81%
• 3Y*: 12.55%
• 5Y*: -0.79%
• 10Y*: 3.34%

XDIV.TO

• 1D: 0.19%
• 1M: 3.65%
• YTD: 19.17%
• 6M: 18.94%
• 1Y: 38.61%
• 3Y*: 22.97%
• 5Y*: 16.42%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XCH.TO vs. XDIV.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
XCH.TO iShares China Index ETF	-6.01%	22.48%	39.50%	-14.76%	-15.40%	-20.56%	7.17%	8.11%	-6.28%	13.26%
XDIV.TO iShares Core MSCI Canadian Quality Dividend Index ETF	19.17%	24.92%	19.56%	11.71%	0.29%	32.25%	-7.81%	24.84%	-10.04%	8.48%

Correlation

The correlation between XCH.TO and XDIV.TO is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.21
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.30
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.24
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 16, 2017	0.30

XCH.TO vs. XDIV.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	XCH.TO	XDIV.TO
Financial Services	34.5%	46.7%
Consumer Cyclical	25.8%	11.5%
Communication Services	12.2%	0.4%
Technology	9.2%	1.3%
Energy	5.2%	28.8%
Basic Materials	3.9%	-
Industrials	3.9%	-
Healthcare	2.2%	-
Real Estate	1.1%	-
Consumer Defensive	0.8%	-
Utilities	0.4%	11.3%

Return for Risk

XCH.TO vs. XDIV.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XCH.TO

XCH.TO Risk / Return Rank: 10
XCH.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 10
XCH.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 10
XCH.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 10
XCH.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
XCH.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 10

XDIV.TO

XDIV.TO Risk / Return Rank: 98
XDIV.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
XDIV.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
XDIV.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 98
XDIV.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
XDIV.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XCH.TO vs. XDIV.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares China Index ETF (XCH.TO) and iShares Core MSCI Canadian Quality Dividend Index ETF (XDIV.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	XCH.TO	XDIV.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.15	4.94	-4.79
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.35	7.29	-6.94
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.04	2.03	-0.99
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.17	16.64	-16.47
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.35	56.55	-56.20
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XCH.TO vs. XDIV.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XCH.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.15, which is lower than the XDIV.TO Sharpe Ratio of 4.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XCH.TO and XDIV.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	XCH.TO	XDIV.TO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.15	4.94	-4.79
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.03	1.57	-1.60
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.13	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.13	0.81	-0.68

Drawdowns

XCH.TO vs. XDIV.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XCH.TO drawdown since its inception was -58.02%, which is greater than XDIV.TO's maximum drawdown of -41.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XCH.TO and XDIV.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	XCH.TO	XDIV.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-58.02%	-41.30%	-16.72%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.51%	-2.33%	-14.18%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-27.28%	-10.53%	-16.75%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-50.32%	-17.60%	-32.72%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-58.02%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-21.53%	-0.09%	-21.44%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-20.41%	-4.25%	-16.16%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	8.15%	0.69%	+7.46%

Volatility

XCH.TO vs. XDIV.TO - Volatility Comparison

iShares China Index ETF (XCH.TO) has a higher volatility of 6.91% compared to iShares Core MSCI Canadian Quality Dividend Index ETF (XDIV.TO) at 2.81%. This indicates that XCH.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XDIV.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XCH.TO	XDIV.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.91%	2.81%	+4.10%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.42%	6.36%	+7.06%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.20%	7.85%	+11.35%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	29.81%	10.53%	+19.28%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	25.73%	16.01%	+9.72%

XCH.TO vs. XDIV.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

XCH.TO has a 0.87% expense ratio, which is higher than XDIV.TO's 0.11% expense ratio.

Dividends

XCH.TO vs. XDIV.TO - Dividend Comparison

XCH.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.25%, less than XDIV.TO's 3.28% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
XCH.TO iShares China Index ETF	2.25%	2.11%	1.54%	2.86%	2.35%	1.50%	2.17%	2.50%	2.45%	2.41%	2.21%	2.58%
XDIV.TO iShares Core MSCI Canadian Quality Dividend Index ETF	3.28%	3.81%	4.29%	4.20%	3.95%	3.58%	4.58%	4.02%	4.85%	1.82%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XCH.TO and XDIV.TO in my portfolio?

XCH.TO and XDIV.TO have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, XCH.TO or XDIV.TO?

On fees, XDIV.TO is cheaper at 0.11% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, XCH.TO or XDIV.TO?

XDIV.TO is cheaper with a 0.11% expense ratio, compared with 0.87% for XCH.TO.

What is the main difference between XCH.TO and XDIV.TO?

XCH.TO is categorized as China Equities, while XDIV.TO is Dividend. XCH.TO tracks Morningstar China GR CAD, while XDIV.TO tracks MSCI Canada High Dividend Yield 10% Security Capped Index. Their fees differ too: 0.87% for XCH.TO and 0.11% for XDIV.TO.