PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XCH.TO vs. SPY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XCH.TO vs. SPY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in iShares China Index ETF (XCH.TO) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

XCH.TO is traded in CAD, while SPY is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the SPY values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XCH.TO achieves a -6.01% return, which is significantly lower than SPY's 12.65% return. Over the past 10 years, XCH.TO has underperformed SPY with an annualized return of 3.34%, while SPY has yielded a comparatively higher 16.36% annualized return.


XCH.TO

1D
-1.76%
1M
-0.68%
YTD
-6.01%
6M
-8.84%
1Y
2.81%
3Y*
12.55%
5Y*
-0.79%
10Y*
3.34%

SPY

1D
0.00%
1M
7.46%
YTD
12.65%
6M
10.82%
1Y
30.02%
3Y*
23.90%
5Y*
17.15%
10Y*
16.36%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XCH.TO vs. SPY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XCH.TO
iShares China Index ETF
-6.01%22.48%39.50%-14.76%-15.40%-20.56%7.17%8.11%-6.28%27.28%
SPY
State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF
12.32%12.32%35.62%23.40%-12.34%27.57%16.33%24.77%3.52%13.96%

Correlation

The correlation between XCH.TO and SPY is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.37

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.29

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.38

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 28, 2010

0.42

The correlation between XCH.TO and SPY shifts across timeframes, from 0.28 (5 years) to 0.42 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

XCH.TO vs. SPY - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XCH.TO
SPY

Financial Services

34.5%
11.8%

Consumer Cyclical

25.8%
10.3%

Communication Services

12.2%
11.3%

Technology

9.2%
35.9%

Energy

5.2%
3.6%

Basic Materials

3.9%
1.8%

Industrials

3.9%
7.8%

Healthcare

2.2%
8.4%

Real Estate

1.1%
1.9%

Consumer Defensive

0.8%
4.8%

Utilities

0.4%
2.4%

Financial Services

XCH.TO
34.5%
SPY
11.8%

Consumer Cyclical

XCH.TO
25.8%
SPY
10.3%

Communication Services

XCH.TO
12.2%
SPY
11.3%

Technology

XCH.TO
9.2%
SPY
35.9%

Energy

XCH.TO
5.2%
SPY
3.6%

Basic Materials

XCH.TO
3.9%
SPY
1.8%

Industrials

XCH.TO
3.9%
SPY
7.8%

Healthcare

XCH.TO
2.2%
SPY
8.4%

Real Estate

XCH.TO
1.1%
SPY
1.9%

Consumer Defensive

XCH.TO
0.8%
SPY
4.8%

Utilities

XCH.TO
0.4%
SPY
2.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XCH.TO vs. SPY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XCH.TO
XCH.TO Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
XCH.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XCH.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
XCH.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
XCH.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
XCH.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank

SPY
SPY Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
SPY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPY Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPY Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
SPY Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPY Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XCH.TO vs. SPY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares China Index ETF (XCH.TO) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XCH.TOSPYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.44

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.12

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.04

1.49

-0.45

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.17

3.50

-3.33

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.35

13.31

-12.97

XCH.TO vs. SPY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XCH.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.15, which is lower than the SPY Sharpe Ratio of 2.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XCH.TO and SPY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XCH.TOSPYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.15

2.59

-2.44

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.03

1.14

-1.16

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.13

1.01

-0.88

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.13

1.13

-1.01

Drawdowns

XCH.TO vs. SPY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XCH.TO drawdown since its inception was -58.02%, which is greater than SPY's maximum drawdown of -27.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XCH.TO and SPY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XCH.TOSPYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.02%

-27.34%

-30.68%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.51%

-8.62%

-7.89%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.28%

-19.00%

-8.28%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-50.32%

-22.08%

-28.24%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-58.02%

-27.34%

-30.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-21.53%

0.00%

-21.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.41%

-3.21%

-17.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.15%

2.26%

+5.89%

Volatility

XCH.TO vs. SPY - Volatility Comparison

iShares China Index ETF (XCH.TO) has a higher volatility of 6.91% compared to State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY) at 2.61%. This indicates that XCH.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XCH.TOSPYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.91%

2.61%

+4.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.42%

8.79%

+4.63%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.20%

11.66%

+7.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.81%

15.15%

+14.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.73%

16.19%

+9.54%

XCH.TO vs. SPY - Expense Ratio Comparison

XCH.TO has a 0.87% expense ratio, which is higher than SPY's 0.09% expense ratio.


Dividends

XCH.TO vs. SPY - Dividend Comparison

XCH.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.25%, more than SPY's 0.98% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SPY
State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF
0.98%1.07%1.21%1.40%1.65%1.20%1.52%1.75%2.04%1.80%2.03%2.06%
XCH.TO
iShares China Index ETF
2.25%2.11%1.54%2.86%2.35%1.50%2.17%2.50%2.45%2.41%2.21%2.58%

Frequently Asked Questions


XCH.TO and SPY have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SPY is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SPY is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.87% for XCH.TO.

XCH.TO is categorized as China Equities, while SPY is S&P 500. XCH.TO tracks Morningstar China GR CAD, while SPY tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.87% for XCH.TO and 0.09% for SPY.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XCH.TO and SPY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer