PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
XCH.TO vs. DSI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

XCH.TO vs. DSI

Last updated Jun 14, 2026

XCH.TO (iShares China Index ETF) and DSI (iShares MSCI KLD 400 Social ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XCH.TO is a China Equities fund tracking the Morningstar China GR CAD, while DSI is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the MSCI KLD 400 Social Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XCH.TO returned 3.62%/yr vs 16.40%/yr for DSI. At a 0.39 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XCH.TO charges 0.87%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for DSI.

Performance

XCH.TO vs. DSI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in iShares China Index ETF (XCH.TO) and iShares MSCI KLD 400 Social ETF (DSI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

XCH.TO is traded in CAD, while DSI is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the DSI values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XCH.TO achieves a -6.21% return, which is significantly lower than DSI's 12.10% return. Over the past 10 years, XCH.TO has underperformed DSI with an annualized return of 3.62%, while DSI has yielded a comparatively higher 16.40% annualized return.

XCH.TO

1D
1.21%
1M
-3.47%
YTD
-6.21%
6M
-7.43%
1Y
1.29%
3Y*
11.77%
5Y*
-0.72%
10Y*
3.62%

DSI

1D
1.01%
1M
0.81%
YTD
12.10%
6M
12.10%
1Y
30.61%
3Y*
22.43%
5Y*
16.04%
10Y*
16.40%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XCH.TO vs. DSI - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XCH.TO
iShares China Index ETF		-6.21%22.48%39.50%-14.76%-15.40%-20.56%7.17%8.11%-6.28%27.28%
DSI
iShares MSCI KLD 400 Social ETF		12.10%12.64%32.74%25.45%-16.75%31.25%18.07%25.75%4.18%12.70%

Correlation

The correlation between XCH.TO and DSI is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.37

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.32

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.30

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.38

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 27, 2010

0.39

XCH.TO vs. DSI - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
XCH.TO
DSI

Financial Services

34.5%
10.1%

Consumer Cyclical

25.6%
8.0%

Communication Services

12.5%
12.8%

Technology

9.0%
43.1%

Energy

5.2%
1.5%

Industrials

3.9%
8.0%

Basic Materials

3.8%
2.2%

Healthcare

2.1%
7.0%

Real Estate

1.1%
2.6%

Consumer Defensive

0.8%
4.0%

Utilities

0.4%
0.9%

Financial Services

XCH.TO
34.5%
DSI
10.1%

Consumer Cyclical

XCH.TO
25.6%
DSI
8.0%

Communication Services

XCH.TO
12.5%
DSI
12.8%

Technology

XCH.TO
9.0%
DSI
43.1%

Energy

XCH.TO
5.2%
DSI
1.5%

Industrials

XCH.TO
3.9%
DSI
8.0%

Basic Materials

XCH.TO
3.8%
DSI
2.2%

Healthcare

XCH.TO
2.1%
DSI
7.0%

Real Estate

XCH.TO
1.1%
DSI
2.6%

Consumer Defensive

XCH.TO
0.8%
DSI
4.0%

Utilities

XCH.TO
0.4%
DSI
0.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares China Index ETF

iShares MSCI KLD 400 Social ETF

Often compared with XCH.TO:
XCH.TO vs. VEE.TOXCH.TO vs. XEC.TOXCH.TO vs. XAW.TOXCH.TO vs. ZCH.TOXCH.TO vs. VFV.TOXCH.TO vs. XIC.TOXCH.TO vs. FBRT
Often compared with DSI:
DSI vs. SPYDSI vs. VOODSI vs. FSLEXDSI vs. XSUS.TODSI vs. VTIDSI vs. QQQDSI vs. SPYG

Return for Risk

XCH.TO vs. DSI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
XCH.TO
XCH.TO Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
XCH.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XCH.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
XCH.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
XCH.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
XCH.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank
DSI
DSI Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
DSI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DSI Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
DSI Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
DSI Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
DSI Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XCH.TO vs. DSI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares China Index ETF (XCH.TO) and iShares MSCI KLD 400 Social ETF (DSI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

XCH.TODSIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
-0.04
2.03

-2.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
0.08
2.79

-2.71

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.01

1.35

-0.34

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.05

2.70

-2.74

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.09

9.78

-9.87

XCH.TO vs. DSI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XCH.TO Sharpe Ratio is -0.04, which is lower than the DSI Sharpe Ratio of 2.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XCH.TO and DSI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XCH.TO vs. DSI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XCH.TO drawdown since its inception was -58.02%, which is greater than DSI's maximum drawdown of -46.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XCH.TO and DSI.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

XCH.TODSIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.02%

-46.77%

-11.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.51%

-10.51%

-6.00%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.28%

-21.44%

-5.84%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-50.32%

-24.84%

-25.48%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-58.02%

-28.10%

-29.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-21.70%

-1.56%

-20.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.40%

-8.95%

-11.45%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.55%

2.90%

+5.65%

Volatility

XCH.TO vs. DSI - Volatility Comparison

iShares China Index ETF (XCH.TO) has a higher volatility of 5.94% compared to iShares MSCI KLD 400 Social ETF (DSI) at 5.41%. This indicates that XCH.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DSI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

XCH.TODSIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.94%

5.41%

+0.53%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.42%

11.15%

+2.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.18%

13.94%

+5.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.79%

18.89%

+10.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.71%

19.76%

+5.95%

XCH.TO vs. DSI - Expense Ratio Comparison

XCH.TO has a 0.87% expense ratio, which is higher than DSI's 0.25% expense ratio.

Dividends

XCH.TO vs. DSI - Dividend Comparison

XCH.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.25%, more than DSI's 0.86% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DSI
iShares MSCI KLD 400 Social ETF		0.86%0.92%1.03%1.19%1.39%0.99%1.22%1.40%1.63%1.28%1.51%1.46%
XCH.TO
iShares China Index ETF		2.25%2.11%1.54%2.86%2.35%1.51%2.17%2.50%2.45%2.41%2.21%2.58%

Frequently Asked Questions

XCH.TO and DSI have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, DSI is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

DSI is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.87% for XCH.TO.

XCH.TO is categorized as China Equities, while DSI is Large Cap Growth Equities. XCH.TO tracks Morningstar China GR CAD, while DSI tracks MSCI KLD 400 Social Index. Their fees differ too: 0.87% for XCH.TO and 0.25% for DSI.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XCH.TO and DSI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer