XCEM vs. IHDG

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

XCEM (Columbia EM Core ex-China ETF) and IHDG (WisdomTree International Hedged Dividend Growth Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - XCEM is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index, while IHDG is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the WisdomTree International Hedged Dividend Growth Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XCEM returned 12.68%/yr vs 10.80%/yr for IHDG. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XCEM charges 0.16%/yr vs 0.58%/yr for IHDG.

Performance

XCEM vs. IHDG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Columbia EM Core ex-China ETF (XCEM) and WisdomTree International Hedged Dividend Growth Fund (IHDG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XCEM achieves a 34.83% return, which is significantly higher than IHDG's 7.08% return. Over the past 10 years, XCEM has outperformed IHDG with an annualized return of 12.68%, while IHDG has yielded a comparatively lower 10.80% annualized return.

XCEM

• 1D: 0.25%
• 1M: 4.23%
• YTD: 34.83%
• 6M: 40.49%
• 1Y: 60.61%
• 3Y*: 24.19%
• 5Y*: 11.44%
• 10Y*: 12.68%

IHDG

• 1D: 0.48%
• 1M: 3.68%
• YTD: 7.08%
• 6M: 8.20%
• 1Y: 16.03%
• 3Y*: 10.87%
• 5Y*: 7.72%
• 10Y*: 10.80%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XCEM vs. IHDG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
XCEM Columbia EM Core ex-China ETF	34.83%	34.05%	0.42%	19.96%	-17.59%	7.87%	9.47%	19.74%	-11.75%	34.78%
IHDG WisdomTree International Hedged Dividend Growth Fund	7.08%	14.17%	5.97%	20.00%	-11.53%	19.75%	10.51%	33.42%	-12.03%	21.93%

Correlation

The correlation between XCEM and IHDG is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.68
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.65
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.67
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.61
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 2, 2015	0.59

The correlation between XCEM and IHDG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.59 to 0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.

XCEM vs. IHDG - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	XCEM	IHDG
Technology	37.1%	7.8%
Financial Services	22.8%	15.2%
Industrials	9.7%	19.7%
Basic Materials	6.4%	5.4%
Consumer Cyclical	6.3%	19.3%
Communication Services	4.2%	4.5%
Energy	3.8%	3.7%
Consumer Defensive	3.0%	4.3%
Healthcare	2.9%	9.4%
Utilities	1.9%	0.8%
Real Estate	1.8%	0.3%

Return for Risk

XCEM vs. IHDG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XCEM

XCEM Risk / Return Rank: 88
XCEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
XCEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
XCEM Omega Ratio Rank: 89
XCEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
XCEM Martin Ratio Rank: 87

IHDG

IHDG Risk / Return Rank: 36
IHDG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 36
IHDG Sortino Ratio Rank: 36
IHDG Omega Ratio Rank: 35
IHDG Calmar Ratio Rank: 35
IHDG Martin Ratio Rank: 40

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XCEM vs. IHDG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia EM Core ex-China ETF (XCEM) and WisdomTree International Hedged Dividend Growth Fund (IHDG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	XCEM	IHDG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.67	1.15	+1.52
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.34	1.70	+1.64
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.49	1.21	+0.28
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.21	1.53	+2.68
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	16.34	5.68	+10.66

XCEM vs. IHDG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XCEM Sharpe Ratio is 2.67, which is higher than the IHDG Sharpe Ratio of 1.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XCEM and IHDG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

XCEM vs. IHDG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XCEM drawdown since its inception was -41.24%, which is greater than IHDG's maximum drawdown of -29.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XCEM and IHDG.

Drawdown Indicators

	XCEM	IHDG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-41.24%	-29.24%	-12.00%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.46%	-10.49%	-3.97%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.92%	-18.88%	-0.04%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-29.57%	-19.52%	-10.05%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-41.24%	-29.24%	-12.00%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.74%	0.00%	-3.74%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.58%	-4.03%	-4.55%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.72%	2.84%	+0.88%

Volatility

XCEM vs. IHDG - Volatility Comparison

Columbia EM Core ex-China ETF (XCEM) has a higher volatility of 11.91% compared to WisdomTree International Hedged Dividend Growth Fund (IHDG) at 4.87%. This indicates that XCEM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IHDG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XCEM	IHDG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.91%	4.87%	+7.04%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	20.97%	11.77%	+9.20%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	22.85%	14.04%	+8.81%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.20%	14.91%	+3.29%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.86%	15.78%	+4.08%

XCEM vs. IHDG - Expense Ratio Comparison

XCEM has a 0.16% expense ratio, which is lower than IHDG's 0.58% expense ratio.

Dividends

XCEM vs. IHDG - Dividend Comparison

XCEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.41%, more than IHDG's 1.79% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
IHDG WisdomTree International Hedged Dividend Growth Fund	1.79%	1.84%	2.42%	1.70%	13.79%	2.77%	1.94%	1.99%	0.22%	1.28%	1.91%	3.04%
XCEM Columbia EM Core ex-China ETF	2.41%	3.25%	2.76%	1.22%	2.42%	1.94%	1.63%	2.11%	2.70%	9.56%	1.24%	2.63%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XCEM and IHDG in my portfolio?

XCEM and IHDG have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, XCEM or IHDG?

XCEM has higher volatility (11.91%) compared to IHDG (4.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XCEM dropped -41.24% vs IHDG's -29.24%.

Which ETF is better, XCEM or IHDG?

On 10-year performance, XCEM leads with 12.68% vs 10.80% for IHDG. On fees, XCEM is cheaper at 0.16% per year. On volatility, IHDG has been the lower-risk option at 4.87%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, XCEM or IHDG?

Over the 10-year period, XCEM has performed better with a 12.68% return vs 10.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, XCEM or IHDG?

XCEM is cheaper with a 0.16% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for IHDG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, XCEM or IHDG?

XCEM has the higher dividend yield at 2.41%, compared with 1.79% for IHDG.

What is the main difference between XCEM and IHDG?

XCEM is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while IHDG is Foreign Large Cap Equities. XCEM tracks MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index, while IHDG tracks WisdomTree International Hedged Dividend Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: Ameriprise Financial and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.16% for XCEM and 0.58% for IHDG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

XCEM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.67 vs 1.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.