PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XCBG.TO vs. HYXF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XCBG.TO vs. HYXF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in iShares ESG Advanced Canadian Corporate Bond Index ETF (XCBG.TO) and iShares ESG Advanced High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (HYXF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

XCBG.TO is traded in CAD, while HYXF is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the HYXF values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XCBG.TO achieves a 1.59% return, which is significantly lower than HYXF's 2.19% return.


XCBG.TO

1D
-0.08%
1M
1.47%
YTD
1.59%
6M
1.49%
1Y
3.86%
3Y*
5.93%
5Y*
10Y*

HYXF

1D
0.17%
1M
2.34%
YTD
2.19%
6M
1.12%
1Y
7.22%
3Y*
9.82%
5Y*
6.62%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XCBG.TO vs. HYXF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
XCBG.TO
iShares ESG Advanced Canadian Corporate Bond Index ETF
1.59%4.21%6.79%7.45%-7.40%-1.10%
HYXF
iShares ESG Advanced High Yield Corporate Bond ETF
2.19%3.88%17.66%9.41%-5.62%1.17%

Correlation

The correlation between XCBG.TO and HYXF is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.26

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.28

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 28, 2021

0.23

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XCBG.TO vs. HYXF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XCBG.TO
XCBG.TO Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
XCBG.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XCBG.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
XCBG.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
XCBG.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
XCBG.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank

HYXF
HYXF Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
HYXF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HYXF Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
HYXF Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
HYXF Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
HYXF Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XCBG.TO vs. HYXF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares ESG Advanced Canadian Corporate Bond Index ETF (XCBG.TO) and iShares ESG Advanced High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (HYXF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XCBG.TOHYXFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.10

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.25

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.91

2.00

-0.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.93

5.18

+0.75

XCBG.TO vs. HYXF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XCBG.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.31, which is comparable to the HYXF Sharpe Ratio of 1.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XCBG.TO and HYXF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XCBG.TOHYXFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.31

1.40

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.53

0.68

-0.15

Drawdowns

XCBG.TO vs. HYXF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XCBG.TO drawdown since its inception was -12.14%, smaller than the maximum HYXF drawdown of -14.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XCBG.TO and HYXF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XCBG.TOHYXFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.14%

-14.73%

+2.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.03%

-3.62%

+1.59%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.26%

-7.25%

+4.99%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.08%

0.00%

-0.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.53%

-2.89%

-0.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.65%

1.40%

-0.75%

Volatility

XCBG.TO vs. HYXF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares ESG Advanced Canadian Corporate Bond Index ETF (XCBG.TO) is 1.07%, while iShares ESG Advanced High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (HYXF) has a volatility of 1.17%. This indicates that XCBG.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HYXF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XCBG.TOHYXFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.07%

1.17%

-0.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.37%

4.08%

-1.71%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.95%

5.18%

-2.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.21%

7.92%

-3.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.21%

8.68%

-4.47%

XCBG.TO vs. HYXF - Expense Ratio Comparison

XCBG.TO has a 0.17% expense ratio, which is lower than HYXF's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

XCBG.TO vs. HYXF - Dividend Comparison

XCBG.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.93%, less than HYXF's 6.09% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
HYXF
iShares ESG Advanced High Yield Corporate Bond ETF
6.09%6.19%6.40%5.93%5.37%4.56%4.96%5.29%6.14%5.85%3.16%
XCBG.TO
iShares ESG Advanced Canadian Corporate Bond Index ETF
3.93%3.84%3.61%3.19%2.99%0.87%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


XCBG.TO and HYXF have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XCBG.TO is cheaper at 0.17% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XCBG.TO is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for HYXF.

XCBG.TO is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while HYXF is High Yield Bonds. XCBG.TO tracks Morningstar Can Corp Bd GR CAD, while HYXF tracks Bloomberg MSCI US High Yield Corporate Choice ESG Screened. Their fees differ too: 0.17% for XCBG.TO and 0.35% for HYXF.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XCBG.TO and HYXF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer