PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XCB.TO vs. PFIA.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XCB.TO vs. PFIA.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in iShares Core Canadian Corporate Bond Index ETF (XCB.TO) and Picton Mahoney Fortified Income Alternative Fund (PFIA.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XCB.TO achieves a 1.75% return, which is significantly higher than PFIA.TO's 0.42% return.


XCB.TO

1D
-0.10%
1M
1.66%
YTD
1.75%
6M
1.49%
1Y
4.27%
3Y*
6.23%
5Y*
2.30%
10Y*
2.77%

PFIA.TO

1D
-0.20%
1M
0.72%
YTD
0.42%
6M
0.81%
1Y
3.71%
3Y*
6.11%
5Y*
3.36%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XCB.TO vs. PFIA.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
XCB.TO
iShares Core Canadian Corporate Bond Index ETF
1.75%4.45%6.72%8.30%-9.79%-1.81%8.36%0.59%
PFIA.TO
Picton Mahoney Fortified Income Alternative Fund
0.42%5.46%7.72%7.27%-3.42%3.17%9.28%3.68%

Correlation

The correlation between XCB.TO and PFIA.TO is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.04

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.07

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.09

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 19, 2019

0.10

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XCB.TO vs. PFIA.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XCB.TO
XCB.TO Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
XCB.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XCB.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
XCB.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
XCB.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
XCB.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank

PFIA.TO
PFIA.TO Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
PFIA.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PFIA.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
PFIA.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
PFIA.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
PFIA.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XCB.TO vs. PFIA.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core Canadian Corporate Bond Index ETF (XCB.TO) and Picton Mahoney Fortified Income Alternative Fund (PFIA.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XCB.TOPFIA.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.35

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.62

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.29

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.72

2.75

-1.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.08

7.73

-2.64

XCB.TO vs. PFIA.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XCB.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.15, which is comparable to the PFIA.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XCB.TO and PFIA.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XCB.TOPFIA.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.15

1.49

-0.35

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.41

0.81

-0.40

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.39

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.63

0.76

-0.12

Drawdowns

XCB.TO vs. PFIA.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XCB.TO drawdown since its inception was -22.59%, which is greater than PFIA.TO's maximum drawdown of -17.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XCB.TO and PFIA.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XCB.TOPFIA.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.59%

-17.12%

-5.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.49%

-1.36%

-1.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.56%

-1.47%

-2.09%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.17%

-6.46%

-7.71%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.10%

-0.50%

+0.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.12%

-1.13%

-0.99%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.84%

0.48%

+0.36%

Volatility

XCB.TO vs. PFIA.TO - Volatility Comparison

iShares Core Canadian Corporate Bond Index ETF (XCB.TO) has a higher volatility of 1.45% compared to Picton Mahoney Fortified Income Alternative Fund (PFIA.TO) at 1.15%. This indicates that XCB.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PFIA.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XCB.TOPFIA.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.45%

1.15%

+0.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.92%

1.89%

+1.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.74%

2.50%

+1.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.67%

4.16%

+1.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.23%

6.41%

+0.82%

Dividends

XCB.TO vs. PFIA.TO - Dividend Comparison

XCB.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.13%, less than PFIA.TO's 4.49% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PFIA.TO
Picton Mahoney Fortified Income Alternative Fund
4.49%3.96%3.68%5.64%4.69%4.25%6.03%1.93%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XCB.TO
iShares Core Canadian Corporate Bond Index ETF
4.13%4.10%4.00%3.69%3.55%3.01%2.75%2.95%3.10%3.07%3.19%3.31%

Frequently Asked Questions


XCB.TO and PFIA.TO have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XCB.TO and PFIA.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer