XBOX vs. MOOD

Last updated Jul 21, 2026

XBOX (Roundhill Ultra Short Duration No Dividend Target ETF) and MOOD (Relative Sentiment Tactical Allocation ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XBOX is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by Roundhill, while MOOD is a Tactical Allocation fund actively managed by Relative Sentiment. Both are actively managed. At a 0.13 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XBOX charges 0.14%/yr vs 0.73%/yr for MOOD.

Performance

XBOX vs. MOOD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill Ultra Short Duration No Dividend Target ETF (XBOX) and Relative Sentiment Tactical Allocation ETF (MOOD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

XBOX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.32%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

MOOD

• 1D: -0.26%
• 1M: -2.03%
• 6M: 6.31%
• YTD: 12.81%
• 1Y: 30.11%
• 3Y*: 18.95%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 15.16%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XBOX vs. MOOD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
XBOX Roundhill Ultra Short Duration No Dividend Target ETF	1.29%
MOOD Relative Sentiment Tactical Allocation ETF	3.95%

Correlation

The correlation between XBOX and MOOD is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 18, 2026	0.13

Return for Risk

XBOX vs. MOOD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XBOX

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

MOOD

MOOD Risk / Return Rank: 79
MOOD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
MOOD Sortino Ratio Rank: 73
MOOD Omega Ratio Rank: 87
MOOD Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
MOOD Martin Ratio Rank: 71

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XBOX vs. MOOD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Ultra Short Duration No Dividend Target ETF (XBOX) and Relative Sentiment Tactical Allocation ETF (MOOD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	XBOX	MOOD	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	2.06	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.48	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.40	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	3.12	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	9.45	—

Drawdowns

XBOX vs. MOOD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XBOX drawdown since its inception was -0.83%, smaller than the maximum MOOD drawdown of -14.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XBOX and MOOD.

Drawdown Indicators

	XBOX	MOOD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-0.83%	-14.34%	+13.51%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-9.71%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-9.71%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-2.48%	+2.48%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.08%	-2.30%	+2.22%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	3.19%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	XBOX	MOOD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	3.00%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	12.48%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.04%	14.72%	-12.68%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	2.04%	12.11%	-10.07%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	2.04%	12.11%	-10.07%

XBOX vs. MOOD - Expense Ratio Comparison

XBOX has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is lower than MOOD's 0.73% expense ratio.

Dividends

XBOX vs. MOOD - Dividend Comparison

XBOX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MOOD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.36%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
MOOD Relative Sentiment Tactical Allocation ETF	0.36%	0.40%	1.33%	1.34%	1.43%
XBOX Roundhill Ultra Short Duration No Dividend Target ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XBOX and MOOD in my portfolio?

XBOX and MOOD have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, XBOX or MOOD?

On fees, XBOX is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, XBOX or MOOD?

XBOX is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.73% for MOOD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, XBOX or MOOD?

MOOD has the higher dividend yield at 0.36%, compared with 0.00% for XBOX.

What is the main difference between XBOX and MOOD?

XBOX is categorized as Ultrashort Bond, while MOOD is Tactical Allocation. They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and Relative Sentiment. Their fees differ too: 0.14% for XBOX and 0.73% for MOOD.