XBOC vs. UXJL

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

XBOC (Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated 9 Buffer ETF - October) and UXJL (FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - July) are both Defined Outcome funds. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. XBOC charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for UXJL.

Performance

XBOC vs. UXJL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated 9 Buffer ETF - October (XBOC) and FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - July (UXJL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XBOC achieves a 5.40% return, which is significantly lower than UXJL's 11.78% return.

XBOC

• 1D: -0.10%
• 1M: 1.89%
• YTD: 5.40%
• 6M: 6.20%
• 1Y: 13.69%
• 3Y*: 11.67%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

UXJL

• 1D: -0.76%
• 1M: 6.02%
• YTD: 11.78%
• 6M: 11.50%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XBOC vs. UXJL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
XBOC Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated 9 Buffer ETF - October	5.40%	4.65%
UXJL FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - July	11.78%	9.31%

Correlation

The correlation between XBOC and UXJL is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 22, 2025	0.92

Return for Risk

XBOC vs. UXJL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XBOC

XBOC Risk / Return Rank: 69
XBOC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
XBOC Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
XBOC Omega Ratio Rank: 78
XBOC Calmar Ratio Rank: 56
XBOC Martin Ratio Rank: 78

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XBOC vs. UXJL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated 9 Buffer ETF - October (XBOC) and FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - July (UXJL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	XBOC	UXJL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.15	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.12	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.46	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.75	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.85	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	XBOC	UXJL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.15	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.86	1.87	-1.01

Drawdowns

XBOC vs. UXJL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XBOC drawdown since its inception was -13.35%, which is greater than UXJL's maximum drawdown of -10.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XBOC and UXJL.

Drawdown Indicators

	XBOC	UXJL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-13.35%	-10.29%	-3.06%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.99%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-12.53%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.11%	-0.76%	+0.65%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.08%	-1.51%	-0.57%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.92%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	XBOC	UXJL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.78%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.19%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	6.41%	13.90%	-7.49%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	9.90%	13.90%	-4.00%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	9.90%	13.90%	-4.00%

XBOC vs. UXJL - Expense Ratio Comparison

XBOC has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than UXJL's 0.85% expense ratio.

Dividends

XBOC vs. UXJL - Dividend Comparison

Neither XBOC nor UXJL has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XBOC and UXJL in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.92, XBOC and UXJL move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, XBOC or UXJL?

On fees, XBOC is cheaper at 0.79% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, XBOC or UXJL?

XBOC is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for UXJL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, XBOC or UXJL?

XBOC and UXJL have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between XBOC and UXJL?

They also come from different issuers: Innovator and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for XBOC and 0.85% for UXJL.