PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XBOC vs. BOUT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XBOC vs. BOUT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated 9 Buffer ETF - October (XBOC) and Innovator IBD Breakout Opportunities ETF (BOUT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XBOC achieves a 5.40% return, which is significantly lower than BOUT's 31.39% return.


XBOC

1D
-0.10%
1M
1.89%
YTD
5.40%
6M
6.20%
1Y
13.69%
3Y*
11.67%
5Y*
10Y*

BOUT

1D
-0.01%
1M
5.85%
YTD
31.39%
6M
30.30%
1Y
35.27%
3Y*
17.42%
5Y*
8.25%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XBOC vs. BOUT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
XBOC
Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated 9 Buffer ETF - October
5.40%11.15%8.36%20.06%-7.58%3.76%
BOUT
Innovator IBD Breakout Opportunities ETF
31.39%-6.77%18.82%13.27%-22.60%11.82%

Correlation

The correlation between XBOC and BOUT is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.68

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 4, 2021

0.67

The correlation between XBOC and BOUT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.

XBOC vs. BOUT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XBOC
BOUT

Technology

36.2%
28.4%

Financial Services

11.9%
22.9%

Communication Services

10.9%
2.0%

Consumer Cyclical

10.1%
8.5%

Healthcare

8.4%
2.6%

Industrials

8.1%
9.7%

Consumer Defensive

4.9%
9.7%

Energy

3.5%
3.1%

Utilities

2.3%
7.0%

Real Estate

1.9%
3.5%

Basic Materials

1.8%
9.9%

Technology

XBOC
36.2%
BOUT
28.4%

Financial Services

XBOC
11.9%
BOUT
22.9%

Communication Services

XBOC
10.9%
BOUT
2.0%

Consumer Cyclical

XBOC
10.1%
BOUT
8.5%

Healthcare

XBOC
8.4%
BOUT
2.6%

Industrials

XBOC
8.1%
BOUT
9.7%

Consumer Defensive

XBOC
4.9%
BOUT
9.7%

Energy

XBOC
3.5%
BOUT
3.1%

Utilities

XBOC
2.3%
BOUT
7.0%

Real Estate

XBOC
1.9%
BOUT
3.5%

Basic Materials

XBOC
1.8%
BOUT
9.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XBOC vs. BOUT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XBOC
XBOC Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
XBOC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XBOC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
XBOC Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
XBOC Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
XBOC Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

BOUT
BOUT Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
BOUT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BOUT Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
BOUT Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
BOUT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
BOUT Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XBOC vs. BOUT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated 9 Buffer ETF - October (XBOC) and Innovator IBD Breakout Opportunities ETF (BOUT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XBOCBOUTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.44

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.78

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.30

+0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.75

3.01

-0.26

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.85

9.00

+5.85

XBOC vs. BOUT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XBOC Sharpe Ratio is 2.15, which is comparable to the BOUT Sharpe Ratio of 1.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XBOC and BOUT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XBOCBOUTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.15

1.71

+0.44

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.43

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.86

0.41

+0.45

Drawdowns

XBOC vs. BOUT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XBOC drawdown since its inception was -13.35%, smaller than the maximum BOUT drawdown of -36.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XBOC and BOUT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XBOCBOUTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.35%

-36.75%

+23.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.99%

-11.76%

+6.77%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.53%

-25.31%

+12.78%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.11%

-0.01%

-0.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.08%

-12.29%

+10.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.92%

3.93%

-3.01%

Volatility

XBOC vs. BOUT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated 9 Buffer ETF - October (XBOC) is 0.78%, while Innovator IBD Breakout Opportunities ETF (BOUT) has a volatility of 5.96%. This indicates that XBOC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BOUT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XBOCBOUTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.78%

5.96%

-5.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.19%

16.05%

-10.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.41%

20.79%

-14.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.90%

19.48%

-9.58%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.90%

22.93%

-13.03%

XBOC vs. BOUT - Expense Ratio Comparison

XBOC has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than BOUT's 0.80% expense ratio.


Dividends

XBOC vs. BOUT - Dividend Comparison

XBOC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BOUT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.26%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
BOUT
Innovator IBD Breakout Opportunities ETF
0.26%0.34%0.60%1.32%1.35%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.22%
XBOC
Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated 9 Buffer ETF - October
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


XBOC and BOUT have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BOUT has higher volatility (5.96%) compared to XBOC (0.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XBOC dropped -13.35% vs BOUT's -36.75%.

On 3-year performance, BOUT leads with 17.42% vs 11.67% for XBOC. On fees, XBOC is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, XBOC has been the lower-risk option at 0.78%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, BOUT has performed better with a 17.42% return vs 11.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XBOC is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for BOUT.

BOUT has the higher dividend yield at 0.26%, compared with 0.00% for XBOC.

XBOC is categorized as Defined Outcome, while BOUT is Mid Cap Growth Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for XBOC and 0.80% for BOUT.

XBOC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.15 vs 1.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XBOC and BOUT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer