PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XBOC vs. BOUT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XBOC vs. BOUT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated 9 Buffer ETF - October (XBOC) and Innovator IBD Breakout Opportunities ETF (BOUT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XBOC achieves a 7.12% return, which is significantly lower than BOUT's 27.28% return.


XBOC

1D
0.28%
1M
1.15%
6M
6.07%
YTD
7.12%
1Y
12.32%
3Y*
11.62%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
8.61%

BOUT

1D
-0.06%
1M
-1.78%
6M
17.42%
YTD
27.28%
1Y
26.42%
3Y*
13.48%
5Y*
6.87%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
8.59%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$53.88K$109.20K$102.51K
$65.44K$75.93K$80.56K

XBOC vs. BOUT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
XBOC
Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated 9 Buffer ETF - October
7.12%11.15%8.36%20.06%-7.58%4.19%
BOUT
Innovator IBD Breakout Opportunities ETF
27.28%-6.77%18.82%13.27%-22.60%13.08%

Correlation

The correlation between XBOC and BOUT is 0.71, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.71

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.65

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2021

0.68

The correlation between XBOC and BOUT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.71 - a consistent structural relationship.

XBOC vs. BOUT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XBOC
BOUT

Technology

37.9%
26.9%

Financial Services

11.7%
37.6%

Communication Services

10.0%
3.3%

Consumer Cyclical

9.6%
8.7%

Healthcare

9.1%
7.8%

Industrials

8.4%
5.4%

Consumer Defensive

4.6%
0.9%

Energy

3.0%
0.4%

Utilities

2.3%
7.0%

Real Estate

1.9%
4.3%

Basic Materials

1.7%
8.1%

Technology

XBOC
37.9%
BOUT
26.9%

Financial Services

XBOC
11.7%
BOUT
37.6%

Communication Services

XBOC
10.0%
BOUT
3.3%

Consumer Cyclical

XBOC
9.6%
BOUT
8.7%

Healthcare

XBOC
9.1%
BOUT
7.8%

Industrials

XBOC
8.4%
BOUT
5.4%

Consumer Defensive

XBOC
4.6%
BOUT
0.9%

Energy

XBOC
3.0%
BOUT
0.4%

Utilities

XBOC
2.3%
BOUT
7.0%

Real Estate

XBOC
1.9%
BOUT
4.3%

Basic Materials

XBOC
1.7%
BOUT
8.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XBOC vs. BOUT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

XBOC
XBOC Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
XBOC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XBOC Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
XBOC Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
XBOC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
XBOC Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

BOUT
BOUT Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
BOUT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BOUT Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
BOUT Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
BOUT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
BOUT Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

XBOC vs. BOUT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated 9 Buffer ETF - October (XBOC) and Innovator IBD Breakout Opportunities ETF (BOUT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XBOCBOUTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.76

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.12

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.21

+0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.48

2.26

+0.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.26

6.31

+6.95

XBOC vs. BOUT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XBOC Sharpe Ratio is 1.94, which is higher than the BOUT Sharpe Ratio of 1.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XBOC and BOUT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XBOC vs. BOUT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XBOC drawdown since its inception was -13.35%, smaller than the maximum BOUT drawdown of -36.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XBOC and BOUT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XBOCBOUTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.35%

-36.98%

+23.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.99%

-11.76%

+6.77%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.53%

-25.31%

+12.78%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-5.56%

+5.56%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.01%

-12.18%

+10.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.93%

4.20%

-3.27%

Volatility

XBOC vs. BOUT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated 9 Buffer ETF - October (XBOC) is 1.19%, while Innovator IBD Breakout Opportunities ETF (BOUT) has a volatility of 4.96%. This indicates that XBOC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BOUT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XBOCBOUTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.19%

4.96%

-3.77%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.14%

17.53%

-12.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.40%

22.54%

-16.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.76%

19.79%

-10.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.76%

22.96%

-13.20%

XBOC vs. BOUT - Expense Ratio Comparison

XBOC has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than BOUT's 0.80% expense ratio.


Dividends

XBOC vs. BOUT - Dividend Comparison

XBOC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BOUT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.27%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
BOUT
Innovator IBD Breakout Opportunities ETF
0.27%0.34%0.60%1.32%1.35%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.22%
XBOC
Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated 9 Buffer ETF - October
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


XBOC and BOUT have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BOUT has higher volatility (4.96%) compared to XBOC (1.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XBOC dropped -13.35% vs BOUT's -36.98%.

On 3-year performance, BOUT leads with 13.48% vs 11.62% for XBOC. On fees, XBOC is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, XBOC has been the lower-risk option at 1.19%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, BOUT has performed better with a 13.48% return vs 11.62%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XBOC is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for BOUT.

BOUT has the higher dividend yield at 0.27%, compared with 0.00% for XBOC.

XBOC is categorized as Defined Outcome, while BOUT is Mid Cap Growth Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for XBOC and 0.80% for BOUT.

XBOC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.94 vs 1.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XBOC and BOUT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer