PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
XBM.TO vs. HLIT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

XBM.TO vs. HLIT

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

XBM.TO (iShares S&P/TSX Global Base Metals Index ETF) is Energy Equities fund tracking the Morningstar Can Natural Resource NR CAD, while HLIT (Harmonic Inc.) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, XBM.TO returned 20.17%/yr vs 18.48%/yr for HLIT. At a 0.24 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

XBM.TO vs. HLIT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in iShares S&P/TSX Global Base Metals Index ETF (XBM.TO) and Harmonic Inc. (HLIT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

XBM.TO is traded in CAD, while HLIT is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the HLIT values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XBM.TO achieves a 38.48% return, which is significantly lower than HLIT's 50.12% return. Over the past 10 years, XBM.TO has outperformed HLIT with an annualized return of 20.17%, while HLIT has yielded a comparatively lower 18.48% annualized return.

XBM.TO

1D
-3.17%
1M
21.23%
YTD
38.48%
6M
46.72%
1Y
119.30%
3Y*
29.93%
5Y*
19.70%
10Y*
20.17%

HLIT

1D
-5.52%
1M
26.72%
YTD
50.12%
6M
49.62%
1Y
56.97%
3Y*
-5.26%
5Y*
18.74%
10Y*
18.48%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XBM.TO vs. HLIT - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XBM.TO
iShares S&P/TSX Global Base Metals Index ETF		38.48%50.69%5.96%2.84%3.69%32.04%31.54%9.93%-22.39%32.45%
HLIT
Harmonic Inc.		50.12%-28.67%10.17%-2.65%19.33%57.70%-6.86%57.13%21.91%-21.35%

Correlation

The correlation between XBM.TO and HLIT is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.26

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.24

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.22

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.25

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 20, 2011

0.24

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares S&P/TSX Global Base Metals Index ETF

Harmonic Inc.

Often compared with XBM.TO:
XBM.TO vs. XMEXBM.TO vs. ZMT.TOXBM.TO vs. XEG.TOXBM.TO vs. XETM.TOXBM.TO vs. GDXXBM.TO vs. VDEXBM.TO vs. XMA.TO
Often compared with HLIT:
HLIT vs. ILITHLIT vs. PLHLIT vs. PUBMHLIT vs. INSGHLIT vs. SSYSHLIT vs. ACMRHLIT vs. VOO

Return for Risk

XBM.TO vs. HLIT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
XBM.TO
XBM.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
XBM.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XBM.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
XBM.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
XBM.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
XBM.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
HLIT
HLIT Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
HLIT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HLIT Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
HLIT Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
HLIT Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
HLIT Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XBM.TO vs. HLIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P/TSX Global Base Metals Index ETF (XBM.TO) and Harmonic Inc. (HLIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

XBM.TOHLITDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
3.37
1.25

+2.12

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
3.67
1.89

+1.77

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.49

1.26

+0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.02

3.21

+1.82

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

19.44

6.83

+12.60

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XBM.TO vs. HLIT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XBM.TO Sharpe Ratio is 3.37, which is higher than the HLIT Sharpe Ratio of 1.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XBM.TO and HLIT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

XBM.TOHLITDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.37

1.25

+2.12

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

0.40

+0.20

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.62

0.37

+0.25

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.25

0.14

+0.11

Drawdowns

XBM.TO vs. HLIT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XBM.TO drawdown since its inception was -67.40%, roughly equal to the maximum HLIT drawdown of -66.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XBM.TO and HLIT.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

XBM.TOHLITDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-67.40%

-66.23%

-1.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-23.88%

-17.84%

-6.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-37.45%

-52.50%

+15.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.57%

-52.50%

+11.93%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-57.24%

-57.93%

+0.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.17%

-15.94%

+12.77%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-25.80%

-28.40%

+2.60%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.16%

8.36%

-2.20%

Volatility

XBM.TO vs. HLIT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares S&P/TSX Global Base Metals Index ETF (XBM.TO) is 13.03%, while Harmonic Inc. (HLIT) has a volatility of 27.32%. This indicates that XBM.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HLIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

XBM.TOHLITDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.03%

27.32%

-14.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

29.68%

37.17%

-7.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

35.62%

45.95%

-10.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

33.06%

47.49%

-14.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.66%

49.80%

-17.14%

Dividends

XBM.TO vs. HLIT - Dividend Comparison

XBM.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.62%, while HLIT has not paid dividends to shareholders.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HLIT
Harmonic Inc.		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XBM.TO
iShares S&P/TSX Global Base Metals Index ETF		0.62%0.86%1.25%2.09%4.83%3.01%1.81%3.71%3.43%1.63%2.42%5.70%

Frequently Asked Questions

XBM.TO and HLIT have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XBM.TO and HLIT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer