PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HLIT vs. PUBM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

HLIT vs. PUBM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Harmonic Inc. (HLIT) and PubMatic, Inc. (PUBM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HLIT achieves a 57.53% return, which is significantly higher than PUBM's 35.74% return.


HLIT

1D
-1.45%
1M
32.48%
YTD
57.53%
6M
61.12%
1Y
72.15%
3Y*
-4.43%
5Y*
17.09%
10Y*
18.35%

PUBM

1D
-1.47%
1M
17.69%
YTD
35.74%
6M
32.89%
1Y
1.35%
3Y*
-12.82%
5Y*
-15.78%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HLIT vs. PUBM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
HLIT
Harmonic Inc.
57.53%-25.25%1.46%-0.46%11.39%59.13%6.41%
PUBM
PubMatic, Inc.
35.74%-39.62%-9.93%27.32%-62.38%21.78%-5.06%

Correlation

The correlation between HLIT and PUBM is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.34

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.32

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.35

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 10, 2020

0.34

Fundamentals

Market Cap

HLIT:

$1.72B

PUBM:

$567.32M

EPS

HLIT:

-$0.37

PUBM:

-$0.37

PS Ratio

HLIT:

3.51

PUBM:

2.03

PB Ratio

HLIT:

4.85

PUBM:

2.26

Total Revenue (TTM)

HLIT:

$500.34M

PUBM:

$281.67M

Gross Profit (TTM)

HLIT:

$260.72M

PUBM:

$178.08M

EBITDA (TTM)

HLIT:

$46.11M

PUBM:

$12.80M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HLIT vs. PUBM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HLIT
HLIT Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
HLIT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HLIT Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
HLIT Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
HLIT Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
HLIT Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

PUBM
PUBM Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
PUBM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PUBM Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
PUBM Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
PUBM Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
PUBM Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HLIT vs. PUBM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harmonic Inc. (HLIT) and PubMatic, Inc. (PUBM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HLITPUBMDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.59

0.02

+1.57

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.25

0.59

+1.66

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.08

+0.23

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.81

0.05

+3.75

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.85

0.08

+8.76

HLIT vs. PUBM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HLIT Sharpe Ratio is 1.59, which is higher than the PUBM Sharpe Ratio of 0.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HLIT and PUBM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HLITPUBMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.59

0.02

+1.57

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.36

-0.24

+0.60

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.36

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.04

-0.21

+0.24

Drawdowns

HLIT vs. PUBM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HLIT drawdown since its inception was -99.32%, which is greater than PUBM's maximum drawdown of -91.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HLIT and PUBM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HLITPUBMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.32%

-91.02%

-8.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.10%

-54.06%

+34.96%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-55.14%

-73.86%

+18.72%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-55.14%

-85.21%

+30.07%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-55.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-89.78%

-82.78%

-7.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-84.34%

-70.67%

-13.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.22%

34.29%

-26.07%

Volatility

HLIT vs. PUBM - Volatility Comparison

Harmonic Inc. (HLIT) has a higher volatility of 26.06% compared to PubMatic, Inc. (PUBM) at 14.16%. This indicates that HLIT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PUBM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HLITPUBMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

26.06%

14.16%

+11.90%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

36.68%

32.82%

+3.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

45.51%

69.51%

-24.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

48.00%

66.39%

-18.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

50.49%

72.55%

-22.06%

Dividends

HLIT vs. PUBM - Dividend Comparison

Neither HLIT nor PUBM has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

HLIT vs. PUBM - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Harmonic Inc. and PubMatic, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


50.00M100.00M150.00M200.00M20222023202420252026
121.70M
62.57M
(HLIT) Total Revenue
(PUBM) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

HLIT vs. PUBM - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Harmonic Inc. and PubMatic, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

45.0%50.0%55.0%60.0%65.0%70.0%75.0%80.0%20222023202420252026
52.3%
58.3%
Portfolio components
HLIT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Harmonic Inc. reported a gross profit of 63.62M and revenue of 121.70M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 52.3%.

PUBM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, PubMatic, Inc. reported a gross profit of 36.47M and revenue of 62.57M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 58.3%.

HLIT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Harmonic Inc. reported an operating income of 20.45M and revenue of 121.70M, resulting in an operating margin of 16.8%.

PUBM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, PubMatic, Inc. reported an operating income of -15.27M and revenue of 62.57M, resulting in an operating margin of -24.4%.

HLIT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Harmonic Inc. reported a net income of 7.31M and revenue of 121.70M, resulting in a net margin of 6.0%.

PUBM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, PubMatic, Inc. reported a net income of -12.51M and revenue of 62.57M, resulting in a net margin of -20.0%.


Frequently Asked Questions


HLIT and PUBM have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HLIT has higher volatility (26.06%) compared to PUBM (14.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HLIT dropped -99.32% vs PUBM's -91.02%.

HLIT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.59 vs 0.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HLIT and PUBM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer