XBLC.L vs. SWDA.L
XBLC.L (Xtrackers II EUR Corporate Bond UCITS ETF 1C) and SWDA.L (iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - XBLC.L is a European Corporate Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg Euro Corp TR EUR, while SWDA.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI World Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XBLC.L returned 0.08%/yr vs 12.89%/yr for SWDA.L. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XBLC.L charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for SWDA.L.
Performance
XBLC.L vs. SWDA.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
XBLC.L is traded in EUR, while SWDA.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the SWDA.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XBLC.L achieves a 0.55% return, which is significantly lower than SWDA.L's 10.97% return.
XBLC.L
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- 0.71%
- YTD
- 0.55%
- 6M
- 0.44%
- 1Y
- 1.87%
- 3Y*
- 4.55%
- 5Y*
- 0.08%
- 10Y*
- —
SWDA.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 4.83%
- YTD
- 10.97%
- 6M
- 11.38%
- 1Y
- 23.82%
- 3Y*
- 17.47%
- 5Y*
- 12.89%
- 10Y*
- 12.82%
XBLC.L vs. SWDA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XBLC.L Xtrackers II EUR Corporate Bond UCITS ETF 1C | 0.55% | 2.95% | 4.36% | 7.51% | -13.29% | -1.05% | 2.52% | 6.28% | -1.52% | 0.63% |
SWDA.L iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 11.06% | 6.76% | 26.95% | 20.08% | -13.06% | 31.68% | 6.15% | 30.86% | -4.97% | 5.78% |
Correlation
The correlation between XBLC.L and SWDA.L is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 22, 2017 | 0.26 |
The correlation between XBLC.L and SWDA.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.26 (5 years) to 0.41 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XBLC.L vs. SWDA.L — Risk / Return Rank
XBLC.L
SWDA.L
XBLC.L vs. SWDA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers II EUR Corporate Bond UCITS ETF 1C (XBLC.L) and iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SWDA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XBLC.L | SWDA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.56 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.15 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | 1.41 | -0.29 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.70 | 3.63 | -2.93 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.42 | 14.82 | -12.40 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XBLC.L | SWDA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.62 | 2.18 | -1.56 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.02 | 0.92 | -0.90 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.85 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.18 | 0.85 | -0.68 |
Drawdowns
XBLC.L vs. SWDA.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XBLC.L drawdown since its inception was -17.18%, smaller than the maximum SWDA.L drawdown of -33.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XBLC.L and SWDA.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XBLC.L | SWDA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.18% | -33.00% | +15.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.67% | -6.53% | +3.86% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -2.67% | -20.55% | +17.88% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.18% | -20.55% | +3.37% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.00% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.05% | -0.30% | -0.75% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.50% | -4.31% | -0.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.77% | 1.60% | -0.83% |
Volatility
XBLC.L vs. SWDA.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers II EUR Corporate Bond UCITS ETF 1C (XBLC.L) is 1.18%, while iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SWDA.L) has a volatility of 2.22%. This indicates that XBLC.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SWDA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XBLC.L | SWDA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.18% | 2.22% | -1.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.65% | 7.56% | -4.91% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.01% | 10.88% | -7.87% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.38% | 14.07% | -9.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.71% | 15.15% | -10.44% |
XBLC.L vs. SWDA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
XBLC.L has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than SWDA.L's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XBLC.L vs. SWDA.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither XBLC.L nor SWDA.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
XBLC.L and SWDA.L have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XBLC.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XBLC.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for SWDA.L.
XBLC.L is categorized as European Corporate Bonds, while SWDA.L is Global Equities. XBLC.L tracks Bloomberg Euro Corp TR EUR, while SWDA.L tracks MSCI World Index. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for XBLC.L and 0.20% for SWDA.L.
Find the right allocation for XBLC.L and SWDA.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer