PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XBLC.L vs. GBP5.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XBLC.L vs. GBP5.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers II EUR Corporate Bond UCITS ETF 1C (XBLC.L) and L&G ESG GBP Corporate Bond 0-5 Year UCITS ETF (GBP5.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

XBLC.L is traded in EUR, while GBP5.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the GBP5.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XBLC.L achieves a 0.55% return, which is significantly lower than GBP5.L's 1.78% return.


XBLC.L

1D
0.10%
1M
0.71%
YTD
0.55%
6M
0.44%
1Y
1.87%
3Y*
4.55%
5Y*
0.08%
10Y*

GBP5.L

1D
-0.02%
1M
0.85%
YTD
1.78%
6M
2.28%
1Y
1.95%
3Y*
5.90%
5Y*
2.17%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XBLC.L vs. GBP5.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
XBLC.L
Xtrackers II EUR Corporate Bond UCITS ETF 1C
0.55%2.95%4.36%7.51%-13.29%-0.65%
GBP5.L
L&G ESG GBP Corporate Bond 0-5 Year UCITS ETF
1.78%0.82%9.60%9.16%-10.98%3.43%

Correlation

The correlation between XBLC.L and GBP5.L is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.34

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.38

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.32

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 16, 2021

0.31

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XBLC.L vs. GBP5.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XBLC.L
XBLC.L Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
XBLC.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XBLC.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
XBLC.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
XBLC.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
XBLC.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank

GBP5.L
GBP5.L Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
GBP5.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GBP5.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
GBP5.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
GBP5.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
GBP5.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XBLC.L vs. GBP5.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers II EUR Corporate Bond UCITS ETF 1C (XBLC.L) and L&G ESG GBP Corporate Bond 0-5 Year UCITS ETF (GBP5.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XBLC.LGBP5.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.24

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.35

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.07

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.70

0.79

-0.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.42

1.69

+0.73

XBLC.L vs. GBP5.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XBLC.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.62, which is higher than the GBP5.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XBLC.L and GBP5.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XBLC.LGBP5.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.62

0.37

+0.24

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.02

0.33

-0.31

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.18

0.36

-0.19

Drawdowns

XBLC.L vs. GBP5.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XBLC.L drawdown since its inception was -17.18%, roughly equal to the maximum GBP5.L drawdown of -17.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XBLC.L and GBP5.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XBLC.LGBP5.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.18%

-17.31%

+0.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.67%

-2.45%

-0.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.67%

-5.48%

+2.81%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.18%

-17.31%

+0.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.05%

-0.26%

-0.79%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.50%

-3.44%

-1.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.77%

1.15%

-0.38%

Volatility

XBLC.L vs. GBP5.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers II EUR Corporate Bond UCITS ETF 1C (XBLC.L) is 1.18%, while L&G ESG GBP Corporate Bond 0-5 Year UCITS ETF (GBP5.L) has a volatility of 1.81%. This indicates that XBLC.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GBP5.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XBLC.LGBP5.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.18%

1.81%

-0.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.65%

3.92%

-1.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.01%

5.18%

-2.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.38%

6.61%

-2.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.71%

6.58%

-1.87%

XBLC.L vs. GBP5.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XBLC.L has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is higher than GBP5.L's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XBLC.L vs. GBP5.L - Dividend Comparison

XBLC.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GBP5.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.58%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
GBP5.L
L&G ESG GBP Corporate Bond 0-5 Year UCITS ETF
4.58%4.40%3.78%2.56%1.05%0.32%
XBLC.L
Xtrackers II EUR Corporate Bond UCITS ETF 1C
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


XBLC.L and GBP5.L have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, GBP5.L is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GBP5.L is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.12% for XBLC.L.

XBLC.L tracks Bloomberg Euro Corp TR EUR, while GBP5.L tracks Markit iBoxx GBP NonGilts 1-5 TR. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Legal & General. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for XBLC.L and 0.09% for GBP5.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XBLC.L and GBP5.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer