XBLC.L vs. CSSX5E.MI
XBLC.L (Xtrackers II EUR Corporate Bond UCITS ETF 1C) and CSSX5E.MI (iShares Core EURO STOXX 50 ETF EUR Acc) are both exchange-traded funds - XBLC.L is a European Corporate Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg Euro Corp TR EUR, while CSSX5E.MI is a Europe Equities fund tracking the EURO STOXX® 50. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XBLC.L returned 0.08%/yr vs 11.51%/yr for CSSX5E.MI. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XBLC.L charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for CSSX5E.MI.
Performance
XBLC.L vs. CSSX5E.MI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XBLC.L achieves a 0.55% return, which is significantly lower than CSSX5E.MI's 7.01% return.
XBLC.L
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- 0.71%
- YTD
- 0.55%
- 6M
- 0.44%
- 1Y
- 1.87%
- 3Y*
- 4.55%
- 5Y*
- 0.08%
- 10Y*
- —
CSSX5E.MI
- 1D
- 0.81%
- 1M
- 4.72%
- YTD
- 7.01%
- 6M
- 8.66%
- 1Y
- 15.79%
- 3Y*
- 15.61%
- 5Y*
- 11.51%
- 10Y*
- 10.48%
XBLC.L vs. CSSX5E.MI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XBLC.L Xtrackers II EUR Corporate Bond UCITS ETF 1C | 0.55% | 2.95% | 4.36% | 7.51% | -13.29% | -1.05% | 2.52% | 6.28% | -1.52% | 0.63% |
CSSX5E.MI iShares Core EURO STOXX 50 ETF EUR Acc | 7.01% | 23.04% | 10.93% | 22.79% | -9.22% | 23.62% | -2.24% | 29.02% | -11.96% | -0.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between XBLC.L and CSSX5E.MI is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 22, 2017 | 0.28 |
Over the past year, XBLC.L and CSSX5E.MI have become more correlated (0.49) than their long-term average of 0.28, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XBLC.L vs. CSSX5E.MI — Risk / Return Rank
XBLC.L
CSSX5E.MI
XBLC.L vs. CSSX5E.MI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers II EUR Corporate Bond UCITS ETF 1C (XBLC.L) and iShares Core EURO STOXX 50 ETF EUR Acc (CSSX5E.MI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XBLC.L | CSSX5E.MI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.37 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.64 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | 1.19 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.70 | 1.46 | -0.76 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.42 | 4.91 | -2.49 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XBLC.L | CSSX5E.MI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.62 | 0.99 | -0.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.02 | 0.65 | -0.63 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.57 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.18 | 0.41 | -0.23 |
Drawdowns
XBLC.L vs. CSSX5E.MI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XBLC.L drawdown since its inception was -17.18%, smaller than the maximum CSSX5E.MI drawdown of -38.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XBLC.L and CSSX5E.MI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XBLC.L | CSSX5E.MI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.18% | -38.50% | +21.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.67% | -10.81% | +8.14% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -2.67% | -16.36% | +13.69% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.18% | -23.56% | +6.38% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -38.50% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.05% | -0.44% | -0.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.50% | -7.27% | +2.77% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.77% | 3.21% | -2.44% |
Volatility
XBLC.L vs. CSSX5E.MI - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers II EUR Corporate Bond UCITS ETF 1C (XBLC.L) is 1.18%, while iShares Core EURO STOXX 50 ETF EUR Acc (CSSX5E.MI) has a volatility of 4.92%. This indicates that XBLC.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CSSX5E.MI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XBLC.L | CSSX5E.MI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.18% | 4.92% | -3.74% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.65% | 12.90% | -10.25% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.01% | 15.91% | -12.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.38% | 17.52% | -13.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.71% | 18.32% | -13.61% |
XBLC.L vs. CSSX5E.MI - Expense Ratio Comparison
XBLC.L has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is higher than CSSX5E.MI's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XBLC.L vs. CSSX5E.MI - Dividend Comparison
Neither XBLC.L nor CSSX5E.MI has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
XBLC.L and CSSX5E.MI have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CSSX5E.MI is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CSSX5E.MI is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.12% for XBLC.L.
XBLC.L is categorized as European Corporate Bonds, while CSSX5E.MI is Europe Equities. XBLC.L tracks Bloomberg Euro Corp TR EUR, while CSSX5E.MI tracks EURO STOXX® 50. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for XBLC.L and 0.10% for CSSX5E.MI.
Find the right allocation for XBLC.L and CSSX5E.MI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer