XBLC.L vs. 0UCF.L
XBLC.L (Xtrackers II EUR Corporate Bond UCITS ETF 1C) and 0UCF.L (iShares € Corp Bond Financials UCITS ETF EUR (Dist)) are both European Corporate Bonds funds - XBLC.L tracks the Bloomberg Euro Corp TR EUR while 0UCF.L tracks the Bloomberg Euro-Aggregate: Financials Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XBLC.L returned -0.09%/yr vs 0.34%/yr for 0UCF.L. At a 0.29 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XBLC.L charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for 0UCF.L.
Performance
XBLC.L vs. 0UCF.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with XBLC.L having a 0.52% return and 0UCF.L slightly lower at 0.50%.
XBLC.L
- 1D
- -0.07%
- 1M
- -0.48%
- 6M
- 0.10%
- YTD
- 0.52%
- 1Y
- 1.54%
- 3Y*
- 4.44%
- 5Y*
- -0.09%
- 10Y*
- —
0UCF.L
- 1D
- -0.14%
- 1M
- -0.41%
- 6M
- 0.21%
- YTD
- 0.50%
- 1Y
- 1.25%
- 3Y*
- 5.01%
- 5Y*
- 0.34%
- 10Y*
- 1.09%
XBLC.L vs. 0UCF.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XBLC.L Xtrackers II EUR Corporate Bond UCITS ETF 1C | 0.52% | 2.95% | 4.36% | 7.50% | -13.29% | -1.05% | 2.52% | 6.28% | -1.53% | 0.63% |
0UCF.L iShares € Corp Bond Financials UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) | 0.50% | 3.07% | 5.54% | 7.93% | -13.17% | 0.25% | 1.64% | 5.28% | -1.78% | 0.60% |
Correlation
The correlation between XBLC.L and 0UCF.L is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 21, 2017 | 0.29 |
The correlation between XBLC.L and 0UCF.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.14 (5 years) to 0.34 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XBLC.L vs. 0UCF.L — Risk / Return Rank
XBLC.L
0UCF.L
XBLC.L vs. 0UCF.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers II EUR Corporate Bond UCITS ETF 1C (XBLC.L) and iShares € Corp Bond Financials UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (0UCF.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XBLC.L | 0UCF.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.19 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.25 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 1.08 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.58 | 0.42 | +0.15 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.95 | 1.09 | +0.87 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XBLC.L vs. 0UCF.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XBLC.L drawdown since its inception was -17.18%, roughly equal to the maximum 0UCF.L drawdown of -16.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XBLC.L and 0UCF.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XBLC.L | 0UCF.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.18% | -16.46% | -0.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.67% | -2.95% | +0.28% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -2.67% | -2.95% | +0.28% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.18% | -16.46% | -0.72% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -16.46% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.08% | -1.01% | -0.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.45% | -2.91% | -1.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.79% | 1.15% | -0.36% |
Volatility
XBLC.L vs. 0UCF.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers II EUR Corporate Bond UCITS ETF 1C (XBLC.L) is 0.77%, while iShares € Corp Bond Financials UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (0UCF.L) has a volatility of 1.05%. This indicates that XBLC.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than 0UCF.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XBLC.L | 0UCF.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.77% | 1.05% | -0.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.72% | 3.18% | -0.46% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.06% | 3.98% | -0.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.39% | 5.01% | -0.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.68% | 3.94% | +0.74% |
XBLC.L vs. 0UCF.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
XBLC.L has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than 0UCF.L's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XBLC.L vs. 0UCF.L - Dividend Comparison
XBLC.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while 0UCF.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.18%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0UCF.L iShares € Corp Bond Financials UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) | 3.18% | 3.08% | 2.94% | 2.42% | 1.00% | 0.75% | 0.98% | 0.55% | 1.10% | 1.12% | 1.52% | 1.70% |
XBLC.L Xtrackers II EUR Corporate Bond UCITS ETF 1C | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XBLC.L and 0UCF.L have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XBLC.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XBLC.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for 0UCF.L.
XBLC.L tracks Bloomberg Euro Corp TR EUR, while 0UCF.L tracks Bloomberg Euro-Aggregate: Financials Index. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for XBLC.L and 0.20% for 0UCF.L.
Find the right allocation for XBLC.L and 0UCF.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer