XBJL vs. JANB

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

XBJL (Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated 9 Buffer ETF - July) and JANB (Aptus January Buffer ETF) are both Defined Outcome funds. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.85 means they have usually moved in the same direction. XBJL charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for JANB.

Performance

XBJL vs. JANB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated 9 Buffer ETF - July (XBJL) and Aptus January Buffer ETF (JANB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XBJL achieves a 5.65% return, which is significantly lower than JANB's 7.57% return.

XBJL

• 1D: 0.71%
• 1M: 1.34%
• 6M: 4.81%
• YTD: 5.65%
• 1Y: 11.71%
• 3Y*: 11.73%
• 5Y*: 9.25%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 9.23%

JANB

• 1D: 0.58%
• 1M: 1.38%
• 6M: 6.24%
• YTD: 7.57%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
JANB Aptus January Buffer ETF	$166.17K	$159.93K	$575.10K
XBJL Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated 9 Buffer ETF - July	$233.88K	$201.38K	$150.68K

XBJL vs. JANB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
XBJL Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated 9 Buffer ETF - July	5.65%	2.39%
JANB Aptus January Buffer ETF	7.57%	2.76%

Correlation

The correlation between XBJL and JANB is 0.85, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 14, 2025	0.85

Return for Risk

XBJL vs. JANB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

XBJL

XBJL Risk / Return Rank: 90
XBJL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
XBJL Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
XBJL Omega Ratio Rank: 93
XBJL Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
XBJL Martin Ratio Rank: 94

JANB

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

XBJL vs. JANB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated 9 Buffer ETF - July (XBJL) and Aptus January Buffer ETF (JANB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	XBJL	JANB	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.22	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.42	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.49	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.56	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	19.45	—	—

Drawdowns

XBJL vs. JANB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XBJL drawdown since its inception was -11.78%, which is greater than JANB's maximum drawdown of -6.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XBJL and JANB.

Drawdown Indicators

	XBJL	JANB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-11.78%	-6.52%	-5.26%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.30%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-11.74%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-11.78%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.59%	-1.01%	-0.58%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.60%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	XBJL	JANB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.14%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.13%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.31%	7.38%	-2.07%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	9.93%	7.38%	+2.55%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	9.87%	7.38%	+2.49%

XBJL vs. JANB - Expense Ratio Comparison

XBJL has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than JANB's 0.25% expense ratio.

Dividends

XBJL vs. JANB - Dividend Comparison

Neither XBJL nor JANB has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XBJL and JANB in my portfolio?

XBJL and JANB have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, XBJL or JANB?

On fees, JANB is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, XBJL or JANB?

JANB is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for XBJL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, XBJL or JANB?

XBJL and JANB have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between XBJL and JANB?

They also come from different issuers: Innovator and Aptus. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for XBJL and 0.25% for JANB.