XBJA vs. EAPR

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated 9 Buffer ETF - January (XBJA) and Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - April (EAPR).

XBJA and EAPR are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XBJA is an actively managed fund by Innovator. It was launched on Dec 31, 2021. EAPR is a passively managed fund by Innovator that tracks the performance of the MSCI Emerging Markets. It was launched on Mar 31, 2021.

Performance

XBJA vs. EAPR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated 9 Buffer ETF - January (XBJA) and Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - April (EAPR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

XBJA vs. EAPR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
XBJA Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated 9 Buffer ETF - January	-2.16%	11.12%	11.68%	17.62%	-11.69%
EAPR Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - April	0.61%	14.80%	2.86%	8.19%	-5.25%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XBJA achieves a -2.16% return, which is significantly lower than EAPR's 0.61% return.

XBJA

• 1D: 2.11%
• 1M: -2.78%
• YTD: -2.16%
• 6M: -0.04%
• 1Y: 10.80%
• 3Y*: 10.29%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

EAPR

• 1D: -0.97%
• 1M: -0.66%
• YTD: 0.61%
• 6M: 2.49%
• 1Y: 12.59%
• 3Y*: 6.93%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XBJA vs. EAPR - Expense Ratio Comparison

XBJA has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than EAPR's 0.89% expense ratio.

EAPR

Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - April

XBJA

Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated 9 Buffer ETF - January

Return for Risk

XBJA vs. EAPR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XBJA

XBJA Risk / Return Rank: 56
XBJA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 48
XBJA Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
XBJA Omega Ratio Rank: 71
XBJA Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
XBJA Martin Ratio Rank: 66

EAPR

EAPR Risk / Return Rank: 85
EAPR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
EAPR Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
EAPR Omega Ratio Rank: 95
EAPR Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
EAPR Martin Ratio Rank: 92

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XBJA vs. EAPR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated 9 Buffer ETF - January (XBJA) and Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - April (EAPR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	XBJA	EAPR	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.88	1.64	-0.76
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.38	2.39	-1.01
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	1.46	-0.20
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.15	1.77	-0.62
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	6.80	13.21	-6.41
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XBJA vs. EAPR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XBJA Sharpe Ratio is 0.88, which is lower than the EAPR Sharpe Ratio of 1.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XBJA and EAPR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	XBJA	EAPR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.88	1.64	-0.76
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.48	0.36	+0.12

Correlation

The correlation between XBJA and EAPR is 0.56, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

XBJA vs. EAPR - Dividend Comparison

Neither XBJA nor EAPR has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

XBJA vs. EAPR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XBJA drawdown since its inception was -17.42%, roughly equal to the maximum EAPR drawdown of -17.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XBJA and EAPR.

Drawdown Indicators

	XBJA	EAPR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-17.42%	-17.65%	+0.23%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.45%	-6.99%	-2.46%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.34%	-0.97%	-2.37%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.26%	-4.18%	+0.92%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.60%	0.94%	+0.66%

Volatility

XBJA vs. EAPR - Volatility Comparison

Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated 9 Buffer ETF - January (XBJA) has a higher volatility of 3.74% compared to Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - April (EAPR) at 1.23%. This indicates that XBJA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EAPR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XBJA	EAPR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.74%	1.23%	+2.51%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.84%	2.42%	+2.42%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.40%	7.73%	+4.67%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.78%	9.82%	+1.96%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	11.78%	9.82%	+1.96%