PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XBIL vs. USVN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XBIL vs. USVN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in US Treasury 6 Month Bill ETF (XBIL) and US Treasury 7 Year Note ETF (USVN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XBIL achieves a 1.57% return, which is significantly higher than USVN's -0.65% return.


XBIL

1D
0.01%
1M
0.22%
YTD
1.57%
6M
1.67%
1Y
3.82%
3Y*
4.60%
5Y*
10Y*

USVN

1D
0.11%
1M
0.40%
YTD
-0.65%
6M
-0.53%
1Y
2.56%
3Y*
2.85%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XBIL vs. USVN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
XBIL
US Treasury 6 Month Bill ETF
1.57%4.17%5.16%3.85%
USVN
US Treasury 7 Year Note ETF
-0.65%7.66%0.03%0.67%

Correlation

The correlation between XBIL and USVN is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.25

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.21

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 28, 2023

0.23

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XBIL vs. USVN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XBIL
XBIL Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
XBIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XBIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
XBIL Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
XBIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
XBIL Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank

USVN
USVN Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
USVN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USVN Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
USVN Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
USVN Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
USVN Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XBIL vs. USVN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for US Treasury 6 Month Bill ETF (XBIL) and US Treasury 7 Year Note ETF (USVN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XBILUSVNDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+11.95

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+37.55

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

10.10

1.10

+8.99

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

64.01

0.70

+63.31

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

592.11

1.87

+590.24

XBIL vs. USVN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XBIL Sharpe Ratio is 12.56, which is higher than the USVN Sharpe Ratio of 0.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XBIL and USVN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XBIL vs. USVN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XBIL drawdown since its inception was -0.08%, smaller than the maximum USVN drawdown of -8.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XBIL and USVN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XBILUSVNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-0.08%

-8.27%

+8.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.06%

-3.68%

+3.62%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.07%

-5.85%

+5.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-2.62%

+2.62%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.00%

-2.34%

+2.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.01%

1.37%

-1.36%

Volatility

XBIL vs. USVN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for US Treasury 6 Month Bill ETF (XBIL) is 0.12%, while US Treasury 7 Year Note ETF (USVN) has a volatility of 1.26%. This indicates that XBIL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than USVN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XBILUSVNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.12%

1.26%

-1.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.19%

3.11%

-2.92%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.31%

4.22%

-3.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.38%

5.77%

-5.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.38%

5.77%

-5.39%

XBIL vs. USVN - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both XBIL and USVN have an expense ratio of 0.15%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XBIL vs. USVN - Dividend Comparison

XBIL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.76%, which matches USVN's 3.75% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
USVN
US Treasury 7 Year Note ETF
3.75%3.81%4.07%2.91%
XBIL
US Treasury 6 Month Bill ETF
3.76%4.01%4.90%4.30%

Frequently Asked Questions


XBIL and USVN have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

USVN has higher volatility (1.26%) compared to XBIL (0.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XBIL dropped -0.08% vs USVN's -8.27%.

On 3-year performance, XBIL leads with 4.60% vs 2.85% for USVN. Both ETFs have the same 0.15% expense ratio. On volatility, XBIL has been the lower-risk option at 0.12%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, XBIL has performed better with a 4.60% return vs 2.85%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XBIL and USVN have the same expense ratio: 0.15% per year.

XBIL has the higher dividend yield at 3.76%, compared with 3.75% for USVN.

XBIL is categorized as Ultrashort Bond, while USVN is Government Bonds. XBIL tracks ICE BofA US 6-Month Treasury Bill Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while USVN tracks ICE BofA Current 7-Year US Treasury Index - Benchmark TR Gross.

XBIL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (12.56 vs 0.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XBIL and USVN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer