XBIL vs. SPTU
XBIL (US Treasury 6 Month Bill ETF) and SPTU (State Street SPDR Portfolio Ultra Short T-Bill ETF) are both Ultrashort Bond funds - XBIL tracks the ICE BofA US 6-Month Treasury Bill Index - Benchmark TR Gross while SPTU tracks the ICE BofA US Treasury Bill Index. Both are passively managed. At a 0.24 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XBIL charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for SPTU.
Performance
XBIL vs. SPTU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XBIL achieves a 1.57% return, which is significantly lower than SPTU's 1.66% return.
XBIL
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- 0.22%
- YTD
- 1.57%
- 6M
- 1.67%
- 1Y
- 3.82%
- 3Y*
- 4.60%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPTU
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- 0.29%
- YTD
- 1.66%
- 6M
- 1.74%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XBIL vs. SPTU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
XBIL US Treasury 6 Month Bill ETF | 1.57% | 0.93% |
SPTU State Street SPDR Portfolio Ultra Short T-Bill ETF | 1.66% | 0.87% |
Correlation
The correlation between XBIL and SPTU is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 8, 2025 | 0.24 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XBIL vs. SPTU — Risk / Return Rank
XBIL
SPTU
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
XBIL vs. SPTU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for US Treasury 6 Month Bill ETF (XBIL) and State Street SPDR Portfolio Ultra Short T-Bill ETF (SPTU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XBIL | SPTU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 10.10 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 64.01 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 592.11 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XBIL vs. SPTU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XBIL drawdown since its inception was -0.08%, which is greater than SPTU's maximum drawdown of -0.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XBIL and SPTU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XBIL | SPTU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.08% | -0.04% | -0.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.06% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -0.07% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.00% | -0.00% | 0.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.01% | — | — |
Volatility
XBIL vs. SPTU - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XBIL | SPTU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.12% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.19% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.31% | 0.33% | -0.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.38% | 0.33% | +0.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.38% | 0.33% | +0.05% |
XBIL vs. SPTU - Expense Ratio Comparison
XBIL has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than SPTU's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XBIL vs. SPTU - Dividend Comparison
XBIL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.76%, more than SPTU's 2.36% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
SPTU State Street SPDR Portfolio Ultra Short T-Bill ETF | 2.36% | 0.89% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XBIL US Treasury 6 Month Bill ETF | 3.76% | 4.01% | 4.90% | 4.30% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XBIL and SPTU have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SPTU is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SPTU is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for XBIL.
XBIL has the higher dividend yield at 3.76%, compared with 2.36% for SPTU.
XBIL tracks ICE BofA US 6-Month Treasury Bill Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while SPTU tracks ICE BofA US Treasury Bill Index. They also come from different issuers: US Benchmark Series and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for XBIL and 0.05% for SPTU.
Find the right allocation for XBIL and SPTU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer