PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XBI vs. USO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XBI vs. USO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P Biotech ETF (XBI) and United States Oil Fund LP (USO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XBI achieves a 9.42% return, which is significantly lower than USO's 97.72% return. Over the past 10 years, XBI has outperformed USO with an annualized return of 8.53%, while USO has yielded a comparatively lower 3.57% annualized return.


XBI

1D
2.77%
1M
-0.28%
YTD
9.42%
6M
8.61%
1Y
62.35%
3Y*
15.65%
5Y*
1.14%
10Y*
8.53%

USO

1D
-2.92%
1M
-5.15%
YTD
97.72%
6M
91.54%
1Y
97.20%
3Y*
28.78%
5Y*
23.67%
10Y*
3.57%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XBI vs. USO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XBI
SPDR S&P Biotech ETF
9.42%35.89%1.01%7.60%-25.87%-20.45%48.33%32.56%-15.28%43.77%
USO
United States Oil Fund LP
97.72%-8.46%13.35%-4.94%28.97%64.68%-67.79%32.61%-19.57%2.47%

Correlation

The correlation between XBI and USO is -0.30, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.30

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.11

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.01

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.10

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 11, 2006

0.15

The correlation between XBI and USO shifts across timeframes, from -0.30 (1 year) to 0.15 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XBI vs. USO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XBI
XBI Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
XBI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XBI Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
XBI Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
XBI Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
XBI Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

USO
USO Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
USO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
USO Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
USO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
USO Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XBI vs. USO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Biotech ETF (XBI) and United States Oil Fund LP (USO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XBIUSODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.24

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.52

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.37

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.45

4.79

+1.65

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

19.53

9.00

+10.54

XBI vs. USO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XBI Sharpe Ratio is 2.45, which is comparable to the USO Sharpe Ratio of 2.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XBI and USO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XBIUSODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.45

2.21

+0.24

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.04

0.66

-0.62

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.27

0.09

+0.18

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.36

-0.18

+0.54

Drawdowns

XBI vs. USO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XBI drawdown since its inception was -63.89%, smaller than the maximum USO drawdown of -98.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XBI and USO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XBIUSODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.89%

-98.19%

+34.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.72%

-20.39%

+10.67%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-32.99%

-26.05%

-6.94%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-54.71%

-36.23%

-18.48%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-63.89%

-86.75%

+22.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-22.89%

-85.45%

+62.56%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.93%

-75.30%

+54.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.20%

10.84%

-7.64%

Volatility

XBI vs. USO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR S&P Biotech ETF (XBI) is 9.69%, while United States Oil Fund LP (USO) has a volatility of 14.97%. This indicates that XBI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than USO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XBIUSODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.69%

14.97%

-5.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.31%

38.35%

-18.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.60%

44.32%

-18.72%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

32.20%

36.09%

-3.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.00%

39.00%

-7.00%

XBI vs. USO - Expense Ratio Comparison

XBI has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than USO's 0.86% expense ratio.


Dividends

XBI vs. USO - Dividend Comparison

XBI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.33%, while USO has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
USO
United States Oil Fund LP
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XBI
SPDR S&P Biotech ETF
0.33%0.37%0.15%0.02%0.00%0.04%0.20%0.00%0.28%0.24%0.26%0.61%

Frequently Asked Questions


XBI and USO have a correlation of -0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

USO has higher volatility (14.97%) compared to XBI (9.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XBI dropped -63.89% vs USO's -98.19%.

On 10-year performance, XBI leads with 8.53% vs 3.57% for USO. On fees, XBI is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, XBI has been the lower-risk option at 9.69%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, XBI has performed better with a 8.53% return vs 3.57%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XBI is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.86% for USO.

XBI has the higher dividend yield at 0.33%, compared with 0.00% for USO.

XBI is categorized as Health & Biotech Equities, while USO is Oil & Gas. XBI tracks S&P Biotechnology Select Industry Index, while USO tracks Front Month Light Sweet Crude Oil. They also come from different issuers: State Street and USCF. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XBI and 0.86% for USO.

XBI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.45 vs 2.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XBI and USO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer