XBI vs. UNHW
XBI (SPDR S&P Biotech ETF) and UNHW (Roundhill UNH WeeklyPay ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XBI is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the S&P Biotechnology Select Industry Index, while UNHW is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Roundhill Investments. XBI is passively managed, while UNHW is actively managed. At a 0.12 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XBI charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for UNHW.
Performance
XBI vs. UNHW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XBI achieves a 24.45% return, which is significantly lower than UNHW's 29.71% return.
XBI
- 1D
- 1.26%
- 1M
- 13.79%
- YTD
- 24.45%
- 6M
- 20.14%
- 1Y
- 82.88%
- 3Y*
- 22.41%
- 5Y*
- 1.92%
- 10Y*
- 11.96%
UNHW
- 1D
- 3.00%
- 1M
- 12.75%
- YTD
- 29.71%
- 6M
- 31.14%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XBI vs. UNHW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
XBI SPDR S&P Biotech ETF | 24.45% | 3.27% |
UNHW Roundhill UNH WeeklyPay ETF | 29.71% | 1.54% |
Correlation
The correlation between XBI and UNHW is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 3, 2025 | 0.12 |
XBI vs. UNHW - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XBI
UNHW
Healthcare
Financial Services
-
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Healthcare
XBI
UNHW
Financial Services
XBI
UNHW
-
Basic Materials
XBI
UNHW
-
Communication Services
XBI
-
UNHW
-
Consumer Cyclical
XBI
-
UNHW
-
Consumer Defensive
XBI
-
UNHW
-
Energy
XBI
-
UNHW
-
Industrials
XBI
-
UNHW
-
Real Estate
XBI
-
UNHW
-
Technology
XBI
-
UNHW
-
Utilities
XBI
-
UNHW
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XBI vs. UNHW — Risk / Return Rank
XBI
UNHW
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
XBI vs. UNHW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Biotech ETF (XBI) and Roundhill UNH WeeklyPay ETF (UNHW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XBI | UNHW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.48 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 8.57 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 25.32 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XBI vs. UNHW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XBI drawdown since its inception was -63.89%, which is greater than UNHW's maximum drawdown of -32.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XBI and UNHW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XBI | UNHW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.89% | -32.28% | -31.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.72% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -32.99% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -54.71% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -63.89% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.30% | 0.00% | -12.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.93% | -11.17% | -9.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.28% | — | — |
Volatility
XBI vs. UNHW - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XBI | UNHW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.94% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.13% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.48% | 48.43% | -21.95% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.30% | 48.43% | -16.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.00% | 48.43% | -16.43% |
XBI vs. UNHW - Expense Ratio Comparison
XBI has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than UNHW's 0.99% expense ratio.
Dividends
XBI vs. UNHW - Dividend Comparison
XBI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.38%, less than UNHW's 17.76% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UNHW Roundhill UNH WeeklyPay ETF | 17.76% | 2.81% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XBI SPDR S&P Biotech ETF | 0.38% | 0.37% | 0.15% | 0.02% | 0.00% | 0.04% | 0.20% | 0.00% | 0.28% | 0.24% | 0.26% | 0.61% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XBI and UNHW have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XBI is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XBI is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for UNHW.
UNHW has the higher dividend yield at 17.76%, compared with 0.38% for XBI.
XBI is categorized as Health & Biotech Equities, while UNHW is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Roundhill Investments. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XBI and 0.99% for UNHW.
Find the right allocation for XBI and UNHW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer