XBCU.L vs. SGLN.L
XBCU.L (Xtrackers Bloomberg Commodity ex-Agriculture & Livestock Swap UCITS ETF 2C) and SGLN.L (iShares Physical Gold ETC) are both exchange-traded funds - XBCU.L is a Commodities fund tracking the Bloomberg ex-Agriculture and Livestock 15/30 Capped 3 Month Forward, while SGLN.L is a Gold fund tracking the LBMA Gold Price. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XBCU.L returned 9.95%/yr vs 13.44%/yr for SGLN.L. At a 0.34 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XBCU.L charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for SGLN.L.
Performance
XBCU.L vs. SGLN.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
XBCU.L is traded in USD, while SGLN.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the SGLN.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XBCU.L achieves a 23.15% return, which is significantly higher than SGLN.L's 3.64% return. Over the past 10 years, XBCU.L has underperformed SGLN.L with an annualized return of 9.95%, while SGLN.L has yielded a comparatively higher 13.44% annualized return.
XBCU.L
- 1D
- -0.49%
- 1M
- 0.54%
- YTD
- 23.15%
- 6M
- 26.23%
- 1Y
- 45.54%
- 3Y*
- 19.51%
- 5Y*
- 15.55%
- 10Y*
- 9.95%
SGLN.L
- 1D
- 0.75%
- 1M
- -2.20%
- YTD
- 3.64%
- 6M
- 6.20%
- 1Y
- 32.48%
- 3Y*
- 31.47%
- 5Y*
- 18.86%
- 10Y*
- 13.44%
XBCU.L vs. SGLN.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XBCU.L Xtrackers Bloomberg Commodity ex-Agriculture & Livestock Swap UCITS ETF 2C | 23.15% | 26.09% | 8.64% | -9.97% | 20.96% | 39.63% | -1.34% | 7.54% | -11.30% | 5.31% |
SGLN.L iShares Physical Gold ETC | 3.64% | 65.25% | 26.06% | 12.89% | -0.12% | -3.46% | 23.28% | 19.23% | -1.55% | 11.36% |
Correlation
The correlation between XBCU.L and SGLN.L is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 13, 2011 | 0.34 |
The correlation between XBCU.L and SGLN.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.33 (10 years) to 0.47 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XBCU.L vs. SGLN.L — Risk / Return Rank
XBCU.L
SGLN.L
XBCU.L vs. SGLN.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Bloomberg Commodity ex-Agriculture & Livestock Swap UCITS ETF 2C (XBCU.L) and iShares Physical Gold ETC (SGLN.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XBCU.L | SGLN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.21 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.28 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.45 | 1.25 | +0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.85 | 1.85 | +3.01 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.65 | 4.74 | +8.90 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XBCU.L | SGLN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.54 | 1.33 | +1.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.83 | 1.08 | -0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.60 | 0.85 | -0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.27 | 0.46 | -0.19 |
Drawdowns
XBCU.L vs. SGLN.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XBCU.L drawdown since its inception was -62.92%, which is greater than SGLN.L's maximum drawdown of -45.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XBCU.L and SGLN.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XBCU.L | SGLN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.92% | -45.21% | -17.71% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.34% | -17.50% | +8.16% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.95% | -17.50% | +4.55% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.83% | -21.27% | -6.56% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.15% | -21.27% | -15.88% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.70% | -15.90% | +13.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -29.73% | -19.80% | -9.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.33% | 6.83% | -3.50% |
Volatility
XBCU.L vs. SGLN.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers Bloomberg Commodity ex-Agriculture & Livestock Swap UCITS ETF 2C (XBCU.L) is 4.24%, while iShares Physical Gold ETC (SGLN.L) has a volatility of 5.74%. This indicates that XBCU.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SGLN.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XBCU.L | SGLN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.24% | 5.74% | -1.50% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.16% | 21.04% | -5.88% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.83% | 24.26% | -6.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.65% | 17.52% | +1.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.52% | 15.86% | +0.66% |
XBCU.L vs. SGLN.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
XBCU.L has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than SGLN.L's 0.12% expense ratio.
Dividends
XBCU.L vs. SGLN.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither XBCU.L nor SGLN.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
XBCU.L and SGLN.L have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SGLN.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SGLN.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for XBCU.L.
XBCU.L is categorized as Commodities, while SGLN.L is Gold. XBCU.L tracks Bloomberg ex-Agriculture and Livestock 15/30 Capped 3 Month Forward, while SGLN.L tracks LBMA Gold Price. They also come from different issuers: DWS and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for XBCU.L and 0.12% for SGLN.L.
Find the right allocation for XBCU.L and SGLN.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer