XBCU.L vs. ICOM.L
XBCU.L (Xtrackers Bloomberg Commodity ex-Agriculture & Livestock Swap UCITS ETF 2C) and ICOM.L (iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF) are both Commodities funds - XBCU.L tracks the Bloomberg ex-Agriculture and Livestock 15/30 Capped 3 Month Forward while ICOM.L tracks the Bloomberg Commodity (Total Return Index). Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XBCU.L returned 15.55%/yr vs 11.06%/yr for ICOM.L. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. XBCU.L charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for ICOM.L.
Performance
XBCU.L vs. ICOM.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XBCU.L achieves a 23.15% return, which is significantly lower than ICOM.L's 24.73% return.
XBCU.L
- 1D
- -0.49%
- 1M
- 0.54%
- YTD
- 23.15%
- 6M
- 26.23%
- 1Y
- 45.54%
- 3Y*
- 19.51%
- 5Y*
- 15.55%
- 10Y*
- 9.95%
ICOM.L
- 1D
- -1.26%
- 1M
- -3.64%
- YTD
- 24.73%
- 6M
- 24.19%
- 1Y
- 37.66%
- 3Y*
- 15.67%
- 5Y*
- 11.06%
- 10Y*
- —
XBCU.L vs. ICOM.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XBCU.L Xtrackers Bloomberg Commodity ex-Agriculture & Livestock Swap UCITS ETF 2C | 23.15% | 26.09% | 8.64% | -9.97% | 20.96% | 39.63% | -1.34% | 7.54% | -11.30% | 8.62% |
ICOM.L iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF | 24.73% | 16.45% | 5.07% | -8.06% | 14.83% | 27.05% | -3.74% | 6.75% | -10.19% | 5.58% |
Correlation
The correlation between XBCU.L and ICOM.L is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 27, 2017 | 0.86 |
The correlation between XBCU.L and ICOM.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.
XBCU.L vs. ICOM.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XBCU.L
ICOM.L
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Industrials
-
Healthcare
-
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
Real Estate
Energy
-
Basic Materials
Utilities
-
Technology
XBCU.L
ICOM.L
Communication Services
XBCU.L
ICOM.L
Consumer Defensive
XBCU.L
ICOM.L
Industrials
XBCU.L
ICOM.L
-
Healthcare
XBCU.L
ICOM.L
-
Consumer Cyclical
XBCU.L
ICOM.L
Financial Services
XBCU.L
ICOM.L
Real Estate
XBCU.L
ICOM.L
Energy
XBCU.L
ICOM.L
-
Basic Materials
XBCU.L
ICOM.L
Utilities
XBCU.L
ICOM.L
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XBCU.L vs. ICOM.L — Risk / Return Rank
XBCU.L
ICOM.L
XBCU.L vs. ICOM.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Bloomberg Commodity ex-Agriculture & Livestock Swap UCITS ETF 2C (XBCU.L) and iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF (ICOM.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XBCU.L | ICOM.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.32 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.30 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.45 | 1.41 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.85 | 5.22 | -0.37 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.65 | 12.15 | +1.50 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XBCU.L | ICOM.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.54 | 2.22 | +0.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.83 | 0.67 | +0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.60 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.27 | 0.55 | -0.28 |
Drawdowns
XBCU.L vs. ICOM.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XBCU.L drawdown since its inception was -62.92%, which is greater than ICOM.L's maximum drawdown of -33.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XBCU.L and ICOM.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XBCU.L | ICOM.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.92% | -33.13% | -29.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.34% | -7.18% | -2.16% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.95% | -11.40% | -1.55% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.83% | -26.74% | -1.09% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.15% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.70% | -5.33% | +2.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -29.73% | -12.87% | -16.86% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.33% | 3.09% | +0.24% |
Volatility
XBCU.L vs. ICOM.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers Bloomberg Commodity ex-Agriculture & Livestock Swap UCITS ETF 2C (XBCU.L) is 4.24%, while iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF (ICOM.L) has a volatility of 5.49%. This indicates that XBCU.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ICOM.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XBCU.L | ICOM.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.24% | 5.49% | -1.25% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.16% | 15.09% | +0.07% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.83% | 16.90% | +0.93% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.65% | 16.51% | +2.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.52% | 15.23% | +1.29% |
XBCU.L vs. ICOM.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
XBCU.L has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than ICOM.L's 0.19% expense ratio.
Dividends
XBCU.L vs. ICOM.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither XBCU.L nor ICOM.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
XBCU.L and ICOM.L have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ICOM.L is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ICOM.L is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for XBCU.L.
XBCU.L tracks Bloomberg ex-Agriculture and Livestock 15/30 Capped 3 Month Forward, while ICOM.L tracks Bloomberg Commodity (Total Return Index). They also come from different issuers: DWS and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for XBCU.L and 0.19% for ICOM.L.
Find the right allocation for XBCU.L and ICOM.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer