PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XBB vs. XSVN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XBB vs. XSVN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BondBloxx BB Rated USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (XBB) and BondBloxx Bloomberg Seven Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF (XSVN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XBB achieves a 1.99% return, which is significantly higher than XSVN's -0.69% return.


XBB

1D
0.32%
1M
0.01%
6M
1.26%
YTD
1.99%
1Y
4.98%
3Y*
7.70%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
5.92%

XSVN

1D
0.50%
1M
-0.65%
6M
-0.40%
YTD
-0.69%
1Y
1.29%
3Y*
3.29%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
2.31%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$2.07M$6.01M$9.51M
$2.70M$3.01M$3.28M

XBB vs. XSVN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
XBB
BondBloxx BB Rated USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF
1.99%8.59%6.41%10.63%0.92%
XSVN
BondBloxx Bloomberg Seven Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF
-0.69%8.18%-0.35%3.91%-1.76%

Correlation

The correlation between XBB and XSVN is 0.53, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.53

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.54

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 15, 2022

0.51

The correlation between XBB and XSVN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.51 to 0.54 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XBB vs. XSVN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

XBB
XBB Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
XBB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XBB Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
XBB Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
XBB Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
XBB Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank

XSVN
XSVN Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
XSVN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XSVN Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
XSVN Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
XSVN Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
XSVN Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

XBB vs. XSVN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BondBloxx BB Rated USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (XBB) and BondBloxx Bloomberg Seven Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF (XSVN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XBBXSVNDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.98

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.43

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.05

+0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.79

0.32

+1.46

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.27

0.75

+6.52

XBB vs. XSVN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XBB Sharpe Ratio is 1.27, which is higher than the XSVN Sharpe Ratio of 0.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XBB and XSVN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XBB vs. XSVN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XBB drawdown since its inception was -8.87%, smaller than the maximum XSVN drawdown of -9.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XBB and XSVN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XBBXSVNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-8.87%

-9.45%

+0.58%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.80%

-4.01%

+1.21%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.79%

-6.61%

+2.82%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.13%

-2.86%

+2.73%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.29%

-2.56%

+1.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.69%

1.72%

-1.03%

Volatility

XBB vs. XSVN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BondBloxx BB Rated USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (XBB) is 0.92%, while BondBloxx Bloomberg Seven Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF (XSVN) has a volatility of 1.32%. This indicates that XBB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XSVN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XBBXSVNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.92%

1.32%

-0.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.94%

3.59%

-0.65%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.94%

4.45%

-0.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.00%

7.10%

-0.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.00%

7.10%

-0.10%

XBB vs. XSVN - Expense Ratio Comparison

XBB has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than XSVN's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XBB vs. XSVN - Dividend Comparison

XBB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.53%, more than XSVN's 4.03% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
XBB
BondBloxx BB Rated USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF
5.53%5.42%6.35%6.15%3.73%
XSVN
BondBloxx Bloomberg Seven Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF
4.03%4.06%4.17%3.49%1.04%

Frequently Asked Questions


XBB and XSVN have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XSVN has higher volatility (1.32%) compared to XBB (0.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XBB dropped -8.87% vs XSVN's -9.45%.

On 3-year performance, XBB leads with 7.70% vs 3.29% for XSVN. On fees, XSVN is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, XBB has been the lower-risk option at 0.92%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, XBB has performed better with a 7.70% return vs 3.29%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XSVN is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for XBB.

XBB has the higher dividend yield at 5.53%, compared with 4.03% for XSVN.

XBB is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while XSVN is Government Bonds. XBB tracks ICE BofA BB US Cash Pay High Yield Constrained Index, while XSVN tracks Bloomberg US Treasury 7 Year Target Duration Index. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for XBB and 0.05% for XSVN.

XBB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.27 vs 0.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XBB and XSVN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer