PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XBB vs. SCYB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XBB vs. SCYB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BondBloxx BB Rated USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (XBB) and Schwab High Yield Bond ETF (SCYB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XBB achieves a 1.53% return, which is significantly lower than SCYB's 1.76% return.


XBB

1D
0.21%
1M
0.46%
YTD
1.53%
6M
1.76%
1Y
6.37%
3Y*
7.84%
5Y*
10Y*

SCYB

1D
0.21%
1M
0.46%
YTD
1.76%
6M
1.99%
1Y
7.03%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XBB vs. SCYB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
XBB
BondBloxx BB Rated USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF
1.53%8.59%6.41%6.48%
SCYB
Schwab High Yield Bond ETF
1.76%8.33%8.15%6.74%

Correlation

The correlation between XBB and SCYB is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.80

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 12, 2023

0.80

The correlation between XBB and SCYB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XBB vs. SCYB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XBB
XBB Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
XBB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XBB Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
XBB Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
XBB Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
XBB Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank

SCYB
SCYB Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
SCYB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCYB Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCYB Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
SCYB Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCYB Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XBB vs. SCYB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BondBloxx BB Rated USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (XBB) and Schwab High Yield Bond ETF (SCYB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XBBSCYBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.25

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.42

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.37

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.28

2.89

-0.61

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.49

12.95

-3.47

XBB vs. SCYB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XBB Sharpe Ratio is 1.64, which is comparable to the SCYB Sharpe Ratio of 1.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XBB and SCYB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XBBSCYBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.64

1.89

-0.25

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.81

1.70

-0.89

Drawdowns

XBB vs. SCYB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XBB drawdown since its inception was -8.87%, which is greater than SCYB's maximum drawdown of -4.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XBB and SCYB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XBBSCYBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-8.87%

-4.92%

-3.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.80%

-2.44%

-0.36%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.20%

-0.12%

-0.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.33%

-0.52%

-0.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.67%

0.54%

+0.13%

Volatility

XBB vs. SCYB - Volatility Comparison

BondBloxx BB Rated USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (XBB) has a higher volatility of 1.25% compared to Schwab High Yield Bond ETF (SCYB) at 1.09%. This indicates that XBB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCYB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XBBSCYBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.25%

1.09%

+0.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.81%

2.94%

-0.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.92%

3.75%

+0.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.08%

5.13%

+1.95%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.08%

5.13%

+1.95%

XBB vs. SCYB - Expense Ratio Comparison

XBB has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than SCYB's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XBB vs. SCYB - Dividend Comparison

XBB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.55%, less than SCYB's 6.92% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
SCYB
Schwab High Yield Bond ETF
6.92%6.99%7.06%3.36%0.00%
XBB
BondBloxx BB Rated USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF
5.55%5.42%6.35%6.15%3.73%

Frequently Asked Questions


XBB and SCYB have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XBB has higher volatility (1.25%) compared to SCYB (1.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XBB dropped -8.87% vs SCYB's -4.92%.

On 1-year performance, SCYB leads with 7.03% vs 6.37% for XBB. On fees, SCYB is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, SCYB has been the lower-risk option at 1.09%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, SCYB has performed better with a 7.03% return vs 6.37%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCYB is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for XBB.

SCYB has the higher dividend yield at 6.92%, compared with 5.55% for XBB.

XBB tracks ICE BofA BB US Cash Pay High Yield Constrained Index, while SCYB tracks ICE BofA US Cash Pay High Yield Constrained Index. They also come from different issuers: BondBloxx and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for XBB and 0.03% for SCYB.

SCYB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.89 vs 1.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XBB and SCYB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer