XBAS.DE vs. XDWD.DE
XBAS.DE (Xtrackers MSCI Singapore UCITS ETF (Acc)) and XDWD.DE (Xtrackers MSCI World UCITS ETF 1C) are both exchange-traded funds - XBAS.DE is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MSCI Singapore Investable Market Index, while XDWD.DE is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI World. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XBAS.DE returned 7.93%/yr vs 13.00%/yr for XDWD.DE. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XBAS.DE charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for XDWD.DE.
Performance
XBAS.DE vs. XDWD.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XBAS.DE achieves a 11.06% return, which is significantly lower than XDWD.DE's 12.57% return. Over the past 10 years, XBAS.DE has underperformed XDWD.DE with an annualized return of 7.93%, while XDWD.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 13.00% annualized return.
XBAS.DE
- 1D
- -0.45%
- 1M
- 3.76%
- 6M
- 11.62%
- YTD
- 11.06%
- 1Y
- 24.16%
- 3Y*
- 20.28%
- 5Y*
- 11.03%
- 10Y*
- 7.93%
XDWD.DE
- 1D
- 0.32%
- 1M
- 1.49%
- 6M
- 12.36%
- YTD
- 12.57%
- 1Y
- 24.32%
- 3Y*
- 17.54%
- 5Y*
- 12.27%
- 10Y*
- 13.00%
XBAS.DE vs. XDWD.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XBAS.DE Xtrackers MSCI Singapore UCITS ETF (Acc) | 11.06% | 15.70% | 34.37% | 0.79% | -4.51% | 12.71% | -13.87% | 19.13% | -5.74% | 17.31% |
XDWD.DE Xtrackers MSCI World UCITS ETF 1C | 12.57% | 7.85% | 25.98% | 20.19% | -13.68% | 32.75% | 5.47% | 31.26% | -4.94% | 7.84% |
Correlation
The correlation between XBAS.DE and XDWD.DE is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 15, 2014 | 0.60 |
The correlation between XBAS.DE and XDWD.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.51 to 0.60 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XBAS.DE vs. XDWD.DE — Risk / Return Rank
XBAS.DE
XDWD.DE
XBAS.DE vs. XDWD.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI Singapore UCITS ETF (Acc) (XBAS.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI World UCITS ETF 1C (XDWD.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XBAS.DE | XDWD.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.39 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.36 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.40 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.37 | 3.82 | -0.45 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.42 | 15.31 | -6.89 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XBAS.DE vs. XDWD.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XBAS.DE drawdown since its inception was -36.43%, which is greater than XDWD.DE's maximum drawdown of -33.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XBAS.DE and XDWD.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XBAS.DE | XDWD.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.43% | -33.55% | -2.88% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.14% | -6.34% | -0.80% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.54% | -21.64% | +1.10% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.54% | -21.64% | +1.10% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.43% | -33.55% | -2.88% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.45% | -0.11% | -0.34% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.46% | -4.52% | -5.94% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.86% | 1.58% | +1.28% |
Volatility
XBAS.DE vs. XDWD.DE - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers MSCI Singapore UCITS ETF (Acc) (XBAS.DE) has a higher volatility of 3.95% compared to Xtrackers MSCI World UCITS ETF 1C (XDWD.DE) at 3.15%. This indicates that XBAS.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XDWD.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XBAS.DE | XDWD.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.95% | 3.15% | +0.80% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.04% | 7.97% | +2.07% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.71% | 11.30% | +2.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.73% | 14.15% | +1.58% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.55% | 15.09% | +1.46% |
XBAS.DE vs. XDWD.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
XBAS.DE has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than XDWD.DE's 0.19% expense ratio.
Dividends
XBAS.DE vs. XDWD.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither XBAS.DE nor XDWD.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
XBAS.DE and XDWD.DE have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XDWD.DE is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XDWD.DE is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for XBAS.DE.
XBAS.DE is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while XDWD.DE is Global Equities. XBAS.DE tracks MSCI Singapore Investable Market Index, while XDWD.DE tracks MSCI World. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for XBAS.DE and 0.19% for XDWD.DE.
Find the right allocation for XBAS.DE and XDWD.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer