PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XBAP vs. POCT
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

XBAP vs. POCT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated 9 Buffer ETF - April (XBAP) and Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF October (POCT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

XBAP vs. POCT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
XBAP
Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated 9 Buffer ETF - April
1.23%13.38%11.55%20.53%-7.59%7.48%
POCT
Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF October
-1.84%11.00%9.54%20.12%-1.26%6.59%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XBAP achieves a 1.23% return, which is significantly higher than POCT's -1.84% return.


XBAP

1D
-0.12%
1M
0.52%
YTD
1.23%
6M
3.38%
1Y
12.13%
3Y*
12.52%
5Y*
10Y*

POCT

1D
1.72%
1M
-2.33%
YTD
-1.84%
6M
0.02%
1Y
10.97%
3Y*
10.87%
5Y*
8.58%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


XBAP vs. POCT - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both XBAP and POCT have an expense ratio of 0.79%.


Return for Risk

XBAP vs. POCT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XBAP
XBAP Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
XBAP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XBAP Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
XBAP Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
XBAP Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
XBAP Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

POCT
POCT Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
POCT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
POCT Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
POCT Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
POCT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
POCT Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XBAP vs. POCT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated 9 Buffer ETF - April (XBAP) and Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF October (POCT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XBAPPOCTDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.21

1.06

+0.14

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.83

1.61

+0.22

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.26

+0.19

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.61

1.58

+0.04

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

10.81

8.51

+2.30

XBAP vs. POCT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XBAP Sharpe Ratio is 1.21, which is comparable to the POCT Sharpe Ratio of 1.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XBAP and POCT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XBAPPOCTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.21

1.06

+0.14

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.90

0.79

+0.11

Correlation

The correlation between XBAP and POCT is 0.81, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

XBAP vs. POCT - Dividend Comparison

Neither XBAP nor POCT has paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019
XBAP
Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated 9 Buffer ETF - April
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
POCT
Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF October
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%2.21%

Drawdowns

XBAP vs. POCT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XBAP drawdown since its inception was -14.57%, smaller than the maximum POCT drawdown of -18.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XBAP and POCT.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


XBAPPOCTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.57%

-18.80%

+4.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.25%

-7.20%

-1.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-10.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.12%

-2.75%

+2.63%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.80%

-1.53%

-0.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.23%

1.33%

-0.10%

Volatility

XBAP vs. POCT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated 9 Buffer ETF - April (XBAP) is 0.52%, while Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF October (POCT) has a volatility of 3.28%. This indicates that XBAP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than POCT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


XBAPPOCTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.52%

3.28%

-2.76%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.75%

5.13%

-3.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.12%

10.35%

-0.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.99%

7.90%

+2.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.99%

10.31%

-0.32%