XBAP vs. JANB

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

XBAP (Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated 9 Buffer ETF - April) and JANB (Aptus January Buffer ETF) are both Defined Outcome funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XBAP charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for JANB.

Performance

XBAP vs. JANB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated 9 Buffer ETF - April (XBAP) and Aptus January Buffer ETF (JANB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XBAP achieves a 7.58% return, which is significantly higher than JANB's 5.32% return.

XBAP

• 1D: -0.37%
• 1M: -0.07%
• YTD: 7.58%
• 6M: 7.77%
• 1Y: 14.57%
• 3Y*: 13.22%
• 5Y*: 9.51%
• 10Y*: —

JANB

• 1D: -0.50%
• 1M: -0.15%
• YTD: 5.32%
• 6M: 5.27%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XBAP vs. JANB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
XBAP Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated 9 Buffer ETF - April	7.58%	2.25%
JANB Aptus January Buffer ETF	5.32%	2.76%

Correlation

The correlation between XBAP and JANB is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 14, 2025	0.78

Return for Risk

XBAP vs. JANB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XBAP

XBAP Risk / Return Rank: 98
XBAP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
XBAP Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
XBAP Omega Ratio Rank: 98
XBAP Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
XBAP Martin Ratio Rank: 98

JANB

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XBAP vs. JANB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated 9 Buffer ETF - April (XBAP) and Aptus January Buffer ETF (JANB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	XBAP	JANB	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	4.06	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	7.30	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	2.04	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	11.29	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	64.34	—	—

Drawdowns

XBAP vs. JANB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XBAP drawdown since its inception was -14.57%, which is greater than JANB's maximum drawdown of -6.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XBAP and JANB.

Drawdown Indicators

	XBAP	JANB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-14.57%	-6.52%	-8.05%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.30%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-8.25%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-14.57%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.69%	-0.97%	+0.28%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.73%	-1.10%	-0.63%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.23%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	XBAP	JANB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.57%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.94%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.62%	7.51%	-3.89%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	9.98%	7.51%	+2.47%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	9.84%	7.51%	+2.33%

XBAP vs. JANB - Expense Ratio Comparison

XBAP has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than JANB's 0.25% expense ratio.

Dividends

XBAP vs. JANB - Dividend Comparison

Neither XBAP nor JANB has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XBAP and JANB in my portfolio?

XBAP and JANB have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, XBAP or JANB?

On fees, JANB is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, XBAP or JANB?

JANB is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for XBAP.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, XBAP or JANB?

XBAP and JANB have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between XBAP and JANB?

They also come from different issuers: Innovator and Aptus Capital Advisors. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for XBAP and 0.25% for JANB.