XBAP vs. BMAR

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated 9 Buffer ETF - April (XBAP) and Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - March (BMAR).

XBAP and BMAR are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XBAP is an actively managed fund by Innovator. It was launched on Mar 31, 2021. BMAR is a passively managed fund by Innovator that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Price Return Index. It was launched on Feb 28, 2020.

Performance

XBAP vs. BMAR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated 9 Buffer ETF - April (XBAP) and Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - March (BMAR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

XBAP vs. BMAR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
XBAP Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated 9 Buffer ETF - April	1.23%	13.38%	11.55%	20.53%	-7.59%	7.48%
BMAR Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - March	-1.06%	14.97%	16.49%	23.09%	-7.06%	10.44%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XBAP achieves a 1.23% return, which is significantly higher than BMAR's -1.06% return.

XBAP

• 1D: -0.12%
• 1M: 0.52%
• YTD: 1.23%
• 6M: 3.38%
• 1Y: 12.13%
• 3Y*: 12.52%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BMAR

• 1D: 2.26%
• 1M: -3.51%
• YTD: -1.06%
• 6M: 1.73%
• 1Y: 15.27%
• 3Y*: 14.84%
• 5Y*: 10.86%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XBAP vs. BMAR - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both XBAP and BMAR have an expense ratio of 0.79%.

XBAP

Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated 9 Buffer ETF - April

BMAR

Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - March

Return for Risk

XBAP vs. BMAR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XBAP

XBAP Risk / Return Rank: 77
XBAP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 68
XBAP Sortino Ratio Rank: 72
XBAP Omega Ratio Rank: 94
XBAP Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
XBAP Martin Ratio Rank: 87

BMAR

BMAR Risk / Return Rank: 73
BMAR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
BMAR Sortino Ratio Rank: 71
BMAR Omega Ratio Rank: 79
BMAR Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
BMAR Martin Ratio Rank: 83

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XBAP vs. BMAR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated 9 Buffer ETF - April (XBAP) and Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - March (BMAR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	XBAP	BMAR	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.21	1.18	+0.03
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.83	1.78	+0.05
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.45	1.30	+0.14
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.61	1.66	-0.04
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	10.81	9.38	+1.43
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XBAP vs. BMAR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XBAP Sharpe Ratio is 1.21, which is comparable to the BMAR Sharpe Ratio of 1.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XBAP and BMAR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	XBAP	BMAR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.21	1.18	+0.03
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.96	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.90	0.85	+0.05

Correlation

The correlation between XBAP and BMAR is 0.91, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

XBAP vs. BMAR - Dividend Comparison

Neither XBAP nor BMAR has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

XBAP vs. BMAR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XBAP drawdown since its inception was -14.57%, smaller than the maximum BMAR drawdown of -21.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XBAP and BMAR.

Drawdown Indicators

	XBAP	BMAR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-14.57%	-21.43%	+6.86%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.25%	-9.47%	+1.22%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-15.02%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.12%	-3.51%	+3.39%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.80%	-2.40%	+0.60%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.23%	1.67%	-0.44%

Volatility

XBAP vs. BMAR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated 9 Buffer ETF - April (XBAP) is 0.52%, while Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - March (BMAR) has a volatility of 4.15%. This indicates that XBAP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BMAR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XBAP	BMAR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.52%	4.15%	-3.63%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.75%	5.88%	-4.13%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.12%	12.98%	-2.86%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	9.99%	11.32%	-1.33%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	9.99%	13.81%	-3.82%