XBAP vs. APRB
XBAP (Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated 9 Buffer ETF - April) and APRB (Aptus April Buffer ETF) are both Defined Outcome funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XBAP charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for APRB.
Performance
XBAP vs. APRB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XBAP achieves a 8.03% return, which is significantly higher than APRB's 4.77% return.
XBAP
- 1D
- -0.19%
- 1M
- 1.69%
- YTD
- 8.03%
- 6M
- 9.02%
- 1Y
- 15.64%
- 3Y*
- 13.76%
- 5Y*
- 9.79%
- 10Y*
- —
APRB
- 1D
- -0.11%
- 1M
- 1.69%
- YTD
- 4.77%
- 6M
- 5.32%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XBAP vs. APRB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
XBAP Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated 9 Buffer ETF - April | 8.03% | 2.29% |
APRB Aptus April Buffer ETF | 4.77% | 2.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between XBAP and APRB is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 15, 2025 | 0.78 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XBAP vs. APRB — Risk / Return Rank
XBAP
APRB
XBAP vs. APRB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated 9 Buffer ETF - April (XBAP) and Aptus April Buffer ETF (APRB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XBAP | APRB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 4.53 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 8.79 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 2.20 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 16.10 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 82.15 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XBAP | APRB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.53 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.99 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.02 | 2.00 | -0.99 |
Drawdowns
XBAP vs. APRB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XBAP drawdown since its inception was -14.57%, which is greater than APRB's maximum drawdown of -4.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XBAP and APRB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XBAP | APRB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.57% | -4.59% | -9.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.98% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -8.25% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -14.57% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.19% | -0.11% | -0.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.74% | -0.74% | -1.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.19% | — | — |
Volatility
XBAP vs. APRB - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XBAP | APRB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.68% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.53% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.47% | 5.98% | -2.51% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.96% | 5.98% | +3.98% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.87% | 5.98% | +3.89% |
XBAP vs. APRB - Expense Ratio Comparison
XBAP has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than APRB's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
XBAP vs. APRB - Dividend Comparison
Neither XBAP nor APRB has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
XBAP and APRB have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, APRB is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
APRB is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for XBAP.
XBAP and APRB have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Innovator and Aptus Capital Advisors. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for XBAP and 0.25% for APRB.
Find the right allocation for XBAP and APRB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer