XBAK.DE vs. XNAS.DE
XBAK.DE (Xtrackers MSCI Pakistan Swap UCITS ETF (Acc)) and XNAS.DE (Xtrackers Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF 1C) are both exchange-traded funds - XBAK.DE is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI Pakistan Investable Market Index, while XNAS.DE is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the Nasdaq 100®. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XBAK.DE returned 10.75%/yr vs 16.39%/yr for XNAS.DE. At a 0.17 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XBAK.DE charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for XNAS.DE.
Performance
XBAK.DE vs. XNAS.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XBAK.DE achieves a 5.19% return, which is significantly lower than XNAS.DE's 19.10% return.
XBAK.DE
- 1D
- 0.62%
- 1M
- 10.20%
- 6M
- 2.53%
- YTD
- 5.19%
- 1Y
- 35.00%
- 3Y*
- 41.08%
- 5Y*
- 10.75%
- 10Y*
- -1.05%
XNAS.DE
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -2.01%
- 6M
- 20.42%
- YTD
- 19.10%
- 1Y
- 33.14%
- 3Y*
- 23.27%
- 5Y*
- 16.39%
- 10Y*
- —
XBAK.DE vs. XNAS.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XBAK.DE Xtrackers MSCI Pakistan Swap UCITS ETF (Acc) | 5.19% | 20.31% | 75.92% | 15.36% | -24.63% | -13.22% |
XNAS.DE Xtrackers Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF 1C | 19.10% | 7.11% | 33.75% | 51.36% | -29.99% | 31.23% |
Correlation
The correlation between XBAK.DE and XNAS.DE is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 27, 2021 | 0.17 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XBAK.DE vs. XNAS.DE — Risk / Return Rank
XBAK.DE
XNAS.DE
XBAK.DE vs. XNAS.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI Pakistan Swap UCITS ETF (Acc) (XBAK.DE) and Xtrackers Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF 1C (XNAS.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XBAK.DE | XNAS.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.72 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.81 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.35 | -0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.47 | 3.33 | -1.86 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.81 | 9.64 | -5.84 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XBAK.DE vs. XNAS.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XBAK.DE drawdown since its inception was -79.30%, which is greater than XNAS.DE's maximum drawdown of -31.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XBAK.DE and XNAS.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XBAK.DE | XNAS.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -79.30% | -31.25% | -48.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.67% | -10.00% | -13.67% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.67% | -26.72% | +3.05% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -49.06% | -31.25% | -17.81% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -79.30% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -32.50% | -2.56% | -29.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -37.83% | -7.75% | -30.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.17% | 3.45% | +5.72% |
Volatility
XBAK.DE vs. XNAS.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI Pakistan Swap UCITS ETF (Acc) (XBAK.DE) is 5.51%, while Xtrackers Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF 1C (XNAS.DE) has a volatility of 6.66%. This indicates that XBAK.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XNAS.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XBAK.DE | XNAS.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.51% | 6.66% | -1.15% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.19% | 12.34% | +11.85% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.00% | 16.97% | +11.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.55% | 20.06% | +4.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.55% | 19.92% | +4.63% |
XBAK.DE vs. XNAS.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
XBAK.DE has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than XNAS.DE's 0.20% expense ratio.
Dividends
XBAK.DE vs. XNAS.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither XBAK.DE nor XNAS.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
XBAK.DE and XNAS.DE have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XNAS.DE is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XNAS.DE is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for XBAK.DE.
XBAK.DE is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while XNAS.DE is Nasdaq-100. XBAK.DE tracks MSCI Pakistan Investable Market Index, while XNAS.DE tracks Nasdaq 100®. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for XBAK.DE and 0.20% for XNAS.DE.
Find the right allocation for XBAK.DE and XNAS.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer