XB vs. HYEM
XB (BondBloxx B Rated USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF) and HYEM (VanEck Vectors Emerging Markets High Yield Bond ETF) are both High Yield Bonds funds - XB tracks the ICE BofA Single-B US Cash Pay High Yield Constrained Index while HYEM tracks the BofA Merrill Lynch Diversified High Yield US Emerging Markets Corporate Plus Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, XB returned 8.50%/yr vs 10.82%/yr for HYEM. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XB charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for HYEM.
Performance
XB vs. HYEM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XB achieves a 1.99% return, which is significantly lower than HYEM's 3.81% return.
XB
- 1D
- 0.17%
- 1M
- 0.64%
- YTD
- 1.99%
- 6M
- 2.60%
- 1Y
- 7.31%
- 3Y*
- 8.50%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HYEM
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- 0.91%
- YTD
- 3.81%
- 6M
- 4.19%
- 1Y
- 10.08%
- 3Y*
- 10.82%
- 5Y*
- 3.02%
- 10Y*
- 4.63%
XB vs. HYEM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XB BondBloxx B Rated USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 1.99% | 7.81% | 7.41% | 12.94% | -4.25% |
HYEM VanEck Vectors Emerging Markets High Yield Bond ETF | 3.81% | 9.24% | 12.14% | 8.35% | -0.36% |
Correlation
The correlation between XB and HYEM is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 27, 2022 | 0.54 |
The correlation between XB and HYEM shifts across timeframes, from 0.41 (1 year) to 0.54 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
XB vs. HYEM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XB
HYEM
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
-
Energy
-
Communication Services
-
Technology
-
Healthcare
-
Basic Materials
-
Real Estate
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Financial Services
-
Utilities
-
Industrials
XB
HYEM
Consumer Cyclical
XB
HYEM
-
Energy
XB
HYEM
-
Communication Services
XB
HYEM
-
Technology
XB
HYEM
-
Healthcare
XB
HYEM
-
Basic Materials
XB
HYEM
-
Real Estate
XB
HYEM
-
Consumer Defensive
XB
HYEM
-
Financial Services
XB
HYEM
-
Utilities
XB
HYEM
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XB vs. HYEM — Risk / Return Rank
XB
HYEM
XB vs. HYEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BondBloxx B Rated USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (XB) and VanEck Vectors Emerging Markets High Yield Bond ETF (HYEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XB | HYEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.37 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.39 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.46 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.40 | 3.71 | -0.31 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.93 | 15.14 | -0.21 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XB | HYEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.97 | 2.33 | -0.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.40 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.50 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.85 | 0.54 | +0.31 |
Drawdowns
XB vs. HYEM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XB drawdown since its inception was -9.25%, smaller than the maximum HYEM drawdown of -30.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XB and HYEM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XB | HYEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.25% | -30.96% | +21.71% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.16% | -2.73% | +0.57% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.36% | -5.23% | -0.13% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -26.30% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -30.96% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.29% | -0.20% | -0.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.32% | -4.40% | +3.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.49% | 0.67% | -0.18% |
Volatility
XB vs. HYEM - Volatility Comparison
BondBloxx B Rated USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (XB) and VanEck Vectors Emerging Markets High Yield Bond ETF (HYEM) have volatilities of 1.37% and 1.32%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XB | HYEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.37% | 1.32% | +0.05% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.97% | 3.21% | -0.24% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.74% | 4.33% | -0.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.44% | 7.49% | -0.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.44% | 9.27% | -1.83% |
XB vs. HYEM - Expense Ratio Comparison
XB has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than HYEM's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
XB vs. HYEM - Dividend Comparison
XB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.07%, more than HYEM's 6.53% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HYEM VanEck Vectors Emerging Markets High Yield Bond ETF | 6.53% | 6.67% | 6.34% | 6.27% | 6.47% | 5.33% | 5.56% | 6.14% | 5.71% | 5.86% | 6.25% | 7.64% |
XB BondBloxx B Rated USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 7.07% | 6.96% | 7.74% | 7.87% | 5.01% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XB and HYEM have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XB has higher volatility (1.37%) compared to HYEM (1.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XB dropped -9.25% vs HYEM's -30.96%.
On 3-year performance, HYEM leads with 10.82% vs 8.50% for XB. On fees, XB is cheaper at 0.30% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, HYEM has performed better with a 10.82% return vs 8.50%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XB is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for HYEM.
XB has the higher dividend yield at 7.07%, compared with 6.53% for HYEM.
XB tracks ICE BofA Single-B US Cash Pay High Yield Constrained Index, while HYEM tracks BofA Merrill Lynch Diversified High Yield US Emerging Markets Corporate Plus Index. They also come from different issuers: BondBloxx and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for XB and 0.40% for HYEM.
HYEM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs 1.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XB and HYEM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer