PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XB vs. HYEM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XB vs. HYEM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BondBloxx B Rated USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (XB) and VanEck Vectors Emerging Markets High Yield Bond ETF (HYEM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XB achieves a 1.99% return, which is significantly lower than HYEM's 3.81% return.


XB

1D
0.17%
1M
0.64%
YTD
1.99%
6M
2.60%
1Y
7.31%
3Y*
8.50%
5Y*
10Y*

HYEM

1D
-0.10%
1M
0.91%
YTD
3.81%
6M
4.19%
1Y
10.08%
3Y*
10.82%
5Y*
3.02%
10Y*
4.63%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XB vs. HYEM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
XB
BondBloxx B Rated USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF
1.99%7.81%7.41%12.94%-4.25%
HYEM
VanEck Vectors Emerging Markets High Yield Bond ETF
3.81%9.24%12.14%8.35%-0.36%

Correlation

The correlation between XB and HYEM is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.41

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.48

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 27, 2022

0.54

The correlation between XB and HYEM shifts across timeframes, from 0.41 (1 year) to 0.54 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

XB vs. HYEM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XB
HYEM

Industrials

9.9%
100.0%

Consumer Cyclical

9.3%

-

Energy

5.2%

-

Communication Services

5.2%

-

Technology

5.0%

-

Healthcare

4.3%

-

Basic Materials

4.1%

-

Real Estate

3.1%

-

Consumer Defensive

3.0%

-

Financial Services

2.3%

-

Utilities

1.1%

-

Industrials

XB
9.9%
HYEM
100.0%

Consumer Cyclical

XB
9.3%
HYEM

-

Energy

XB
5.2%
HYEM

-

Communication Services

XB
5.2%
HYEM

-

Technology

XB
5.0%
HYEM

-

Healthcare

XB
4.3%
HYEM

-

Basic Materials

XB
4.1%
HYEM

-

Real Estate

XB
3.1%
HYEM

-

Consumer Defensive

XB
3.0%
HYEM

-

Financial Services

XB
2.3%
HYEM

-

Utilities

XB
1.1%
HYEM

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XB vs. HYEM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XB
XB Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
XB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XB Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
XB Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
XB Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
XB Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

HYEM
HYEM Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
HYEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HYEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
HYEM Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
HYEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
HYEM Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XB vs. HYEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BondBloxx B Rated USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (XB) and VanEck Vectors Emerging Markets High Yield Bond ETF (HYEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XBHYEMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.37

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.39

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.46

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.40

3.71

-0.31

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.93

15.14

-0.21

XB vs. HYEM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XB Sharpe Ratio is 1.97, which is comparable to the HYEM Sharpe Ratio of 2.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XB and HYEM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XBHYEMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.97

2.33

-0.37

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.40

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.50

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.85

0.54

+0.31

Drawdowns

XB vs. HYEM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XB drawdown since its inception was -9.25%, smaller than the maximum HYEM drawdown of -30.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XB and HYEM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XBHYEMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.25%

-30.96%

+21.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.16%

-2.73%

+0.57%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.36%

-5.23%

-0.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.30%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.96%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.29%

-0.20%

-0.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.32%

-4.40%

+3.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.49%

0.67%

-0.18%

Volatility

XB vs. HYEM - Volatility Comparison

BondBloxx B Rated USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (XB) and VanEck Vectors Emerging Markets High Yield Bond ETF (HYEM) have volatilities of 1.37% and 1.32%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XBHYEMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.37%

1.32%

+0.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.97%

3.21%

-0.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.74%

4.33%

-0.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.44%

7.49%

-0.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.44%

9.27%

-1.83%

XB vs. HYEM - Expense Ratio Comparison

XB has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than HYEM's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

XB vs. HYEM - Dividend Comparison

XB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.07%, more than HYEM's 6.53% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HYEM
VanEck Vectors Emerging Markets High Yield Bond ETF
6.53%6.67%6.34%6.27%6.47%5.33%5.56%6.14%5.71%5.86%6.25%7.64%
XB
BondBloxx B Rated USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF
7.07%6.96%7.74%7.87%5.01%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


XB and HYEM have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XB has higher volatility (1.37%) compared to HYEM (1.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XB dropped -9.25% vs HYEM's -30.96%.

On 3-year performance, HYEM leads with 10.82% vs 8.50% for XB. On fees, XB is cheaper at 0.30% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, HYEM has performed better with a 10.82% return vs 8.50%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XB is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for HYEM.

XB has the higher dividend yield at 7.07%, compared with 6.53% for HYEM.

XB tracks ICE BofA Single-B US Cash Pay High Yield Constrained Index, while HYEM tracks BofA Merrill Lynch Diversified High Yield US Emerging Markets Corporate Plus Index. They also come from different issuers: BondBloxx and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for XB and 0.40% for HYEM.

HYEM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs 1.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XB and HYEM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer