PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XAXJ.L vs. IKOR.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XAXJ.L vs. IKOR.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI AC Asia ex Japan ESG Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XAXJ.L) and iShares MSCI Korea UCITS ETF (Dist) (IKOR.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XAXJ.L achieves a 1.72% return, which is significantly lower than IKOR.L's 107.66% return. Over the past 10 years, XAXJ.L has underperformed IKOR.L with an annualized return of 7.37%, while IKOR.L has yielded a comparatively higher 17.90% annualized return.


XAXJ.L

1D
-1.69%
1M
-0.01%
YTD
1.72%
6M
0.31%
1Y
15.73%
3Y*
9.12%
5Y*
0.83%
10Y*
7.37%

IKOR.L

1D
-4.06%
1M
17.39%
YTD
107.66%
6M
126.31%
1Y
237.26%
3Y*
45.36%
5Y*
19.90%
10Y*
17.90%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XAXJ.L vs. IKOR.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XAXJ.L
Xtrackers MSCI AC Asia ex Japan ESG Swap UCITS ETF 1C
1.72%20.48%10.76%-8.18%-10.59%-4.15%20.15%12.59%-9.32%28.24%
IKOR.L
iShares MSCI Korea UCITS ETF (Dist)
107.66%85.96%-21.55%13.31%-19.76%-7.30%39.09%6.99%-16.57%32.45%

Correlation

The correlation between XAXJ.L and IKOR.L is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.52

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.54

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.70

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 20, 2009

0.74

Over the past year, the correlation between XAXJ.L and IKOR.L has dropped to 0.52 - well below their long-term average of 0.74, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

XAXJ.L vs. IKOR.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XAXJ.L
IKOR.L

Technology

27.5%
56.0%

Industrials

23.4%
18.8%

Financial Services

15.9%
9.2%

Healthcare

9.5%
3.0%

Consumer Cyclical

8.2%
5.7%

Communication Services

7.8%
2.6%

Real Estate

5.7%

-

Basic Materials

2.2%
2.0%

Consumer Defensive

1.5%
1.4%

Energy

0.3%
1.1%

Utilities

0.3%
0.4%

Technology

XAXJ.L
27.5%
IKOR.L
56.0%

Industrials

XAXJ.L
23.4%
IKOR.L
18.8%

Financial Services

XAXJ.L
15.9%
IKOR.L
9.2%

Healthcare

XAXJ.L
9.5%
IKOR.L
3.0%

Consumer Cyclical

XAXJ.L
8.2%
IKOR.L
5.7%

Communication Services

XAXJ.L
7.8%
IKOR.L
2.6%

Real Estate

XAXJ.L
5.7%
IKOR.L

-

Basic Materials

XAXJ.L
2.2%
IKOR.L
2.0%

Consumer Defensive

XAXJ.L
1.5%
IKOR.L
1.4%

Energy

XAXJ.L
0.3%
IKOR.L
1.1%

Utilities

XAXJ.L
0.3%
IKOR.L
0.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XAXJ.L vs. IKOR.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XAXJ.L
XAXJ.L Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
XAXJ.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XAXJ.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
XAXJ.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
XAXJ.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
XAXJ.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank

IKOR.L
IKOR.L Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
IKOR.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IKOR.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
IKOR.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
IKOR.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
IKOR.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XAXJ.L vs. IKOR.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI AC Asia ex Japan ESG Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XAXJ.L) and iShares MSCI Korea UCITS ETF (Dist) (IKOR.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XAXJ.LIKOR.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-5.34

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.31

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.83

-0.65

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.43

10.97

-9.54

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.85

39.06

-35.21

XAXJ.L vs. IKOR.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XAXJ.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.02, which is lower than the IKOR.L Sharpe Ratio of 6.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XAXJ.L and IKOR.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XAXJ.LIKOR.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.02

6.36

-5.34

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.05

0.79

-0.74

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.40

0.74

-0.33

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.47

0.42

+0.05

Drawdowns

XAXJ.L vs. IKOR.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XAXJ.L drawdown since its inception was -35.15%, smaller than the maximum IKOR.L drawdown of -61.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XAXJ.L and IKOR.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XAXJ.LIKOR.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.15%

-61.70%

+26.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.99%

-21.48%

+10.49%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.46%

-28.58%

+12.12%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.60%

-40.83%

+10.23%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.15%

-44.11%

+8.96%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.49%

-5.01%

+0.52%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.14%

-15.59%

+4.45%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.08%

6.05%

-1.97%

Volatility

XAXJ.L vs. IKOR.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI AC Asia ex Japan ESG Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XAXJ.L) is 5.96%, while iShares MSCI Korea UCITS ETF (Dist) (IKOR.L) has a volatility of 17.45%. This indicates that XAXJ.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IKOR.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XAXJ.LIKOR.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.96%

17.45%

-11.49%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.72%

32.34%

-20.62%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.42%

37.08%

-21.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.81%

25.31%

-7.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.23%

24.76%

-6.53%

XAXJ.L vs. IKOR.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XAXJ.L has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than IKOR.L's 0.74% expense ratio.


Dividends

XAXJ.L vs. IKOR.L - Dividend Comparison

XAXJ.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IKOR.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.42%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IKOR.L
iShares MSCI Korea UCITS ETF (Dist)
0.42%0.83%1.31%1.14%1.34%1.36%0.76%1.28%1.07%0.72%0.57%0.43%
XAXJ.L
Xtrackers MSCI AC Asia ex Japan ESG Swap UCITS ETF 1C
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


XAXJ.L and IKOR.L have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XAXJ.L is cheaper at 0.65% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XAXJ.L is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for IKOR.L.

XAXJ.L tracks MSCI AC Asia Ex Japan NR USD, while IKOR.L tracks MSCI Korea NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for XAXJ.L and 0.74% for IKOR.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XAXJ.L and IKOR.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer