PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XAW.TO vs. MEQT.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XAW.TO vs. MEQT.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in iShares Core MSCI All Country World ex Canada Index ETF (XAW.TO) and Mackenzie All-Equity Allocation ETF (MEQT.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XAW.TO achieves a 13.70% return, which is significantly higher than MEQT.TO's 12.88% return.


XAW.TO

1D
-0.37%
1M
7.13%
YTD
13.70%
6M
12.70%
1Y
30.51%
3Y*
21.73%
5Y*
13.96%
10Y*
13.22%

MEQT.TO

1D
-0.41%
1M
6.44%
YTD
12.88%
6M
13.09%
1Y
33.09%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XAW.TO vs. MEQT.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
XAW.TO
iShares Core MSCI All Country World ex Canada Index ETF
13.70%15.87%26.31%1.64%
MEQT.TO
Mackenzie All-Equity Allocation ETF
12.88%21.31%25.87%2.16%

Correlation

The correlation between XAW.TO and MEQT.TO is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.71

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 21, 2023

0.53

The correlation between XAW.TO and MEQT.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.53 (all time) to 0.71 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XAW.TO vs. MEQT.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XAW.TO
XAW.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
XAW.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XAW.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
XAW.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
XAW.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
XAW.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

MEQT.TO
MEQT.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
MEQT.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MEQT.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
MEQT.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
MEQT.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
MEQT.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XAW.TO vs. MEQT.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core MSCI All Country World ex Canada Index ETF (XAW.TO) and Mackenzie All-Equity Allocation ETF (MEQT.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XAW.TOMEQT.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.54

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.86

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

1.60

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.76

4.33

-0.57

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.15

18.61

-3.45

XAW.TO vs. MEQT.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XAW.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.50, which is comparable to the MEQT.TO Sharpe Ratio of 3.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XAW.TO and MEQT.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XAW.TOMEQT.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.50

3.05

-0.54

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.88

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.78

2.12

-1.34

Drawdowns

XAW.TO vs. MEQT.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XAW.TO drawdown since its inception was -27.32%, which is greater than MEQT.TO's maximum drawdown of -15.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XAW.TO and MEQT.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XAW.TOMEQT.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.32%

-15.14%

-12.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.16%

-7.68%

-0.48%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.66%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.02%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.37%

-0.41%

+0.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.91%

-1.29%

-2.62%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.02%

1.78%

+0.24%

Volatility

XAW.TO vs. MEQT.TO - Volatility Comparison

iShares Core MSCI All Country World ex Canada Index ETF (XAW.TO) has a higher volatility of 4.21% compared to Mackenzie All-Equity Allocation ETF (MEQT.TO) at 2.96%. This indicates that XAW.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MEQT.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XAW.TOMEQT.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.21%

2.96%

+1.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.85%

9.02%

+0.83%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.25%

10.92%

+1.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.56%

11.87%

+1.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.12%

11.87%

+3.25%

XAW.TO vs. MEQT.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

XAW.TO has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is higher than MEQT.TO's 0.17% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XAW.TO vs. MEQT.TO - Dividend Comparison

XAW.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.17%, less than MEQT.TO's 1.45% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MEQT.TO
Mackenzie All-Equity Allocation ETF
1.45%1.60%1.73%0.81%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XAW.TO
iShares Core MSCI All Country World ex Canada Index ETF
1.17%1.33%1.61%1.71%1.79%1.77%1.49%2.02%2.29%1.92%1.80%1.83%

Frequently Asked Questions


XAW.TO and MEQT.TO have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, MEQT.TO is cheaper at 0.17% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

MEQT.TO is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 0.22% for XAW.TO.

They also come from different issuers: iShares and Mackenzie Investments. Their fees differ too: 0.22% for XAW.TO and 0.17% for MEQT.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XAW.TO and MEQT.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer