PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XAUS.L vs. XXSC.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XAUS.L vs. XXSC.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Xtrackers S&P/ASX 200 UCITS ETF 1D (XAUS.L) and Xtrackers MSCI Europe Small Cap UCITS ETF 1C (XXSC.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XAUS.L achieves a 8.13% return, which is significantly higher than XXSC.L's 6.58% return. Over the past 10 years, XAUS.L has outperformed XXSC.L with an annualized return of 9.17%, while XXSC.L has yielded a comparatively lower 8.44% annualized return.


XAUS.L

1D
-0.60%
1M
0.41%
YTD
8.13%
6M
9.60%
1Y
16.15%
3Y*
9.59%
5Y*
6.41%
10Y*
9.17%

XXSC.L

1D
0.56%
1M
2.62%
YTD
6.58%
6M
9.35%
1Y
15.64%
3Y*
11.84%
5Y*
4.26%
10Y*
8.44%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XAUS.L vs. XXSC.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XAUS.L
Xtrackers S&P/ASX 200 UCITS ETF 1D
8.13%9.45%3.36%5.67%3.27%9.35%9.38%18.34%-8.52%9.19%
XXSC.L
Xtrackers MSCI Europe Small Cap UCITS ETF 1C
6.58%22.28%0.76%10.44%-17.50%15.39%10.55%24.87%-14.91%23.58%

Correlation

The correlation between XAUS.L and XXSC.L is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.61

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.66

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.62

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.57

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 23, 2009

0.44

The correlation between XAUS.L and XXSC.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.44 (all time) to 0.66 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

XAUS.L vs. XXSC.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XAUS.L
XXSC.L

Financial Services

34.8%
15.3%

Basic Materials

24.7%
7.5%

Consumer Cyclical

6.7%
11.4%

Industrials

6.3%
26.6%

Real Estate

5.8%
8.3%

Healthcare

5.5%
7.3%

Energy

5.0%
5.1%

Communication Services

3.7%
5.0%

Consumer Defensive

3.6%
3.5%

Technology

2.5%
7.4%

Utilities

1.5%
2.5%

Financial Services

XAUS.L
34.8%
XXSC.L
15.3%

Basic Materials

XAUS.L
24.7%
XXSC.L
7.5%

Consumer Cyclical

XAUS.L
6.7%
XXSC.L
11.4%

Industrials

XAUS.L
6.3%
XXSC.L
26.6%

Real Estate

XAUS.L
5.8%
XXSC.L
8.3%

Healthcare

XAUS.L
5.5%
XXSC.L
7.3%

Energy

XAUS.L
5.0%
XXSC.L
5.1%

Communication Services

XAUS.L
3.7%
XXSC.L
5.0%

Consumer Defensive

XAUS.L
3.6%
XXSC.L
3.5%

Technology

XAUS.L
2.5%
XXSC.L
7.4%

Utilities

XAUS.L
1.5%
XXSC.L
2.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XAUS.L vs. XXSC.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XAUS.L
XAUS.L Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
XAUS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XAUS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
XAUS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
XAUS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
XAUS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank

XXSC.L
XXSC.L Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
XXSC.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XXSC.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
XXSC.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
XXSC.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
XXSC.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XAUS.L vs. XXSC.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers S&P/ASX 200 UCITS ETF 1D (XAUS.L) and Xtrackers MSCI Europe Small Cap UCITS ETF 1C (XXSC.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XAUS.LXXSC.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.07

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.23

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.72

1.44

+0.28

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.19

5.17

+0.02

XAUS.L vs. XXSC.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XAUS.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.27, which is comparable to the XXSC.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XAUS.L and XXSC.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XAUS.LXXSC.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.27

1.25

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.43

0.27

+0.16

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

0.55

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.38

0.76

-0.38

Drawdowns

XAUS.L vs. XXSC.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XAUS.L drawdown since its inception was -51.15%, which is greater than XXSC.L's maximum drawdown of -35.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XAUS.L and XXSC.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XAUS.LXXSC.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.15%

-35.12%

-16.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.57%

-10.79%

+1.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.54%

-12.84%

-8.70%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.54%

-30.74%

+9.20%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.31%

-35.12%

-3.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.18%

-1.31%

-2.87%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.06%

-7.53%

-0.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.14%

3.02%

+0.12%

Volatility

XAUS.L vs. XXSC.L - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers S&P/ASX 200 UCITS ETF 1D (XAUS.L) has a higher volatility of 4.33% compared to Xtrackers MSCI Europe Small Cap UCITS ETF 1C (XXSC.L) at 3.95%. This indicates that XAUS.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XXSC.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XAUS.LXXSC.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.33%

3.95%

+0.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.24%

10.48%

-0.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.00%

12.50%

+0.50%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.76%

16.01%

+0.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.45%

16.27%

+4.18%

XAUS.L vs. XXSC.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XAUS.L has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than XXSC.L's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

XAUS.L vs. XXSC.L - Dividend Comparison

XAUS.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.54%, while XXSC.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
XAUS.L
Xtrackers S&P/ASX 200 UCITS ETF 1D
2.54%2.67%3.22%3.83%5.17%2.15%4.85%3.73%3.53%3.49%3.73%0.00%
XXSC.L
Xtrackers MSCI Europe Small Cap UCITS ETF 1C
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%1.95%

Frequently Asked Questions


XAUS.L and XXSC.L have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XXSC.L is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XXSC.L is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for XAUS.L.

XAUS.L is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while XXSC.L is Europe Equities. XAUS.L tracks MSCI Australia NR USD, while XXSC.L tracks MSCI Europe Small Cap NR EUR. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for XAUS.L and 0.30% for XXSC.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XAUS.L and XXSC.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer