PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XASX.L vs. UD03.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XASX.L vs. UD03.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI UK ESG UCITS ETF 1D (XASX.L) and UBS ETF (LU) Factor MSCI EMU Prime Value UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis (UD03.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XASX.L achieves a 1.94% return, which is significantly lower than UD03.L's 12.28% return.


XASX.L

1D
0.45%
1M
1.58%
YTD
1.94%
6M
5.31%
1Y
10.51%
3Y*
7.93%
5Y*
4.82%
10Y*
3.34%

UD03.L

1D
0.26%
1M
4.71%
YTD
12.28%
6M
15.08%
1Y
24.17%
3Y*
14.83%
5Y*
10.72%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XASX.L vs. UD03.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
XASX.L
Xtrackers MSCI UK ESG UCITS ETF 1D
1.94%17.10%6.61%4.99%-9.18%10.11%-15.64%0.64%
UD03.L
UBS ETF (LU) Factor MSCI EMU Prime Value UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis
12.28%25.20%0.78%19.24%-4.62%10.81%5.72%0.00%

Correlation

The correlation between XASX.L and UD03.L is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.50

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.33

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 17, 2019

0.24

Over the past year, XASX.L and UD03.L have become more correlated (0.50) than their long-term average of 0.24, meaning their price movements have been converging.

XASX.L vs. UD03.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XASX.L
UD03.L

Financial Services

32.1%
28.5%

Industrials

17.8%
12.1%

Healthcare

11.9%
4.1%

Basic Materials

10.9%
4.2%

Consumer Defensive

10.8%
14.6%

Consumer Cyclical

6.7%
7.0%

Communication Services

4.7%
3.1%

Utilities

2.0%
7.7%

Real Estate

2.0%

-

Technology

0.8%
16.2%

Energy

0.1%
2.7%

Financial Services

XASX.L
32.1%
UD03.L
28.5%

Industrials

XASX.L
17.8%
UD03.L
12.1%

Healthcare

XASX.L
11.9%
UD03.L
4.1%

Basic Materials

XASX.L
10.9%
UD03.L
4.2%

Consumer Defensive

XASX.L
10.8%
UD03.L
14.6%

Consumer Cyclical

XASX.L
6.7%
UD03.L
7.0%

Communication Services

XASX.L
4.7%
UD03.L
3.1%

Utilities

XASX.L
2.0%
UD03.L
7.7%

Real Estate

XASX.L
2.0%
UD03.L

-

Technology

XASX.L
0.8%
UD03.L
16.2%

Energy

XASX.L
0.1%
UD03.L
2.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XASX.L vs. UD03.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XASX.L
XASX.L Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
XASX.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XASX.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
XASX.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
XASX.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
XASX.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

UD03.L
UD03.L Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
UD03.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UD03.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
UD03.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
UD03.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
UD03.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XASX.L vs. UD03.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI UK ESG UCITS ETF 1D (XASX.L) and UBS ETF (LU) Factor MSCI EMU Prime Value UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis (UD03.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XASX.LUD03.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.64

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.23

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.61

-0.45

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.83

5.70

-4.86

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.57

16.25

-13.68

XASX.L vs. UD03.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XASX.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.83, which is lower than the UD03.L Sharpe Ratio of 3.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XASX.L and UD03.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XASX.LUD03.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

3.47

-2.64

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.36

1.75

-1.39

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.22

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.11

1.19

-1.08

Drawdowns

XASX.L vs. UD03.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XASX.L drawdown since its inception was -47.36%, which is greater than UD03.L's maximum drawdown of -30.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XASX.L and UD03.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XASX.LUD03.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-47.36%

-30.85%

-16.51%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.54%

-9.80%

-2.74%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.67%

-11.72%

-0.95%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.21%

-18.67%

+0.46%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.87%

-1.19%

-5.68%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.90%

-3.31%

-7.59%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.09%

3.56%

+0.53%

Volatility

XASX.L vs. UD03.L - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers MSCI UK ESG UCITS ETF 1D (XASX.L) has a higher volatility of 4.23% compared to UBS ETF (LU) Factor MSCI EMU Prime Value UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis (UD03.L) at 3.58%. This indicates that XASX.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UD03.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XASX.LUD03.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.23%

3.58%

+0.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.99%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.54%

16.13%

-3.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.44%

27.46%

-14.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.36%

47.29%

-31.93%

XASX.L vs. UD03.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XASX.L has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than UD03.L's 0.28% expense ratio.


Dividends

XASX.L vs. UD03.L - Dividend Comparison

XASX.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.03%, less than UD03.L's 2.54% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
UD03.L
UBS ETF (LU) Factor MSCI EMU Prime Value UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis
2.54%2.97%2.84%3.67%3.96%3.50%2.07%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XASX.L
Xtrackers MSCI UK ESG UCITS ETF 1D
0.03%0.03%0.04%0.03%0.06%0.03%0.06%0.04%0.04%0.04%0.04%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


XASX.L and UD03.L have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XASX.L is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XASX.L is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.28% for UD03.L.

XASX.L tracks FTSE AllSh TR GBP, while UD03.L tracks MSCI EMU NR EUR. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and UBS. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for XASX.L and 0.28% for UD03.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XASX.L and UD03.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer