XAR vs. WDAF
XAR (SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF) and WDAF (WisdomTree Asia Defense Fund) are both Aerospace & Defense funds - XAR tracks the S&P Aerospace & Defense Select Industry Index while WDAF tracks the WisdomTree Asia Defense Index. Both are passively managed. Their 0.47 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. XAR charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for WDAF.
Performance
XAR vs. WDAF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XAR achieves a 9.86% return, which is significantly higher than WDAF's -0.06% return.
XAR
- 1D
- 0.77%
- 1M
- -7.89%
- 6M
- -2.90%
- YTD
- 9.86%
- 1Y
- 24.03%
- 3Y*
- 29.11%
- 5Y*
- 16.36%
- 10Y*
- 17.38%
- ALL TIME*
- 18.36%
WDAF
- 1D
- -0.96%
- 1M
- -9.68%
- 6M
- -15.34%
- YTD
- -0.06%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $206.13K | $199.18K | $502.59K | |
| $64.82M | $59.56M | $61.10M |
XAR vs. WDAF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
XAR SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF | 9.86% | 9.57% |
WDAF WisdomTree Asia Defense Fund | -0.06% | -7.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between XAR and WDAF is 0.47, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 12, 2025 | 0.47 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XAR vs. WDAF — Risk / Return Rank
XAR
WDAF
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
XAR vs. WDAF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF (XAR) and WisdomTree Asia Defense Fund (WDAF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XAR | WDAF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.33 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.45 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XAR vs. WDAF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XAR drawdown since its inception was -46.37%, which is greater than WDAF's maximum drawdown of -28.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XAR and WDAF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XAR | WDAF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -46.37% | -28.19% | -18.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.22% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.73% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.55% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -46.37% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.47% | -25.01% | +15.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.78% | -8.46% | +1.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.61% | — | — |
Volatility
XAR vs. WDAF - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XAR | WDAF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.97% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.17% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.75% | 33.47% | -4.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.84% | 33.47% | -9.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.85% | 33.47% | -8.62% |
XAR vs. WDAF - Expense Ratio Comparison
XAR has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than WDAF's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
XAR vs. WDAF - Dividend Comparison
XAR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.31%, more than WDAF's 0.13% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WDAF WisdomTree Asia Defense Fund | 0.13% | 0.13% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XAR SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF | 0.31% | 0.40% | 0.66% | 0.54% | 0.50% | 0.83% | 0.63% | 0.75% | 1.19% | 0.76% | 1.09% | 2.31% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XAR and WDAF have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XAR is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XAR is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for WDAF.
XAR has the higher dividend yield at 0.31%, compared with 0.13% for WDAF.
XAR tracks S&P Aerospace & Defense Select Industry Index, while WDAF tracks WisdomTree Asia Defense Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XAR and 0.45% for WDAF.
Find the right allocation for XAR and WDAF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer