XAR vs. USDX

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

XAR (SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF) and USDX (SGI Enhanced Core ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XAR is a Aerospace & Defense fund tracking the S&P Aerospace & Defense Select Industry Index, while USDX is a Intermediate Core Bond fund actively managed by Summit Global Investments. XAR is passively managed, while USDX is actively managed. Over the past year, XAR returned 44.15% vs 5.97% for USDX. At a correlation of -0.06, they often move in opposite directions. XAR charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.98%/yr for USDX.

Performance

XAR vs. USDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF (XAR) and SGI Enhanced Core ETF (USDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XAR achieves a 16.29% return, which is significantly higher than USDX's 1.79% return.

XAR

• 1D: 2.55%
• 1M: 9.87%
• YTD: 16.29%
• 6M: 20.13%
• 1Y: 44.15%
• 3Y*: 35.55%
• 5Y*: 16.85%
• 10Y*: 18.17%

USDX

• 1D: -0.19%
• 1M: -0.06%
• YTD: 1.79%
• 6M: 2.25%
• 1Y: 5.97%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XAR vs. USDX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
XAR SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF	16.29%	46.15%	21.92%
USDX SGI Enhanced Core ETF	1.79%	6.25%	6.87%

Correlation

The correlation between XAR and USDX is -0.12, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.12
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 1, 2024	-0.06

XAR vs. USDX - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	XAR	USDX
Industrials	99.4%	-
Technology	0.5%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	84.7%
Healthcare	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

XAR vs. USDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XAR

XAR Risk / Return Rank: 48
XAR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 48
XAR Sortino Ratio Rank: 48
XAR Omega Ratio Rank: 43
XAR Calmar Ratio Rank: 53
XAR Martin Ratio Rank: 45

USDX

USDX Risk / Return Rank: 94
USDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
USDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
USDX Omega Ratio Rank: 96
USDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
USDX Martin Ratio Rank: 97

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XAR vs. USDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF (XAR) and SGI Enhanced Core ETF (USDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	XAR	USDX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.65	3.11	-1.46
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.33	4.82	-2.49
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	1.77	-0.50
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.58	6.40	-3.82
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.31	43.95	-36.64
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XAR vs. USDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XAR Sharpe Ratio is 1.65, which is lower than the USDX Sharpe Ratio of 3.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XAR and USDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	XAR	USDX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.65	3.11	-1.46
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.72	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.74	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.85	3.96	-3.10

Drawdowns

XAR vs. USDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XAR drawdown since its inception was -46.37%, which is greater than USDX's maximum drawdown of -0.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XAR and USDX.

Drawdown Indicators

	XAR	USDX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-46.37%	-0.94%	-45.43%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.22%	-0.94%	-16.28%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.73%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-32.40%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-46.37%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.17%	-0.64%	-3.53%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.78%	-0.06%	-6.72%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.05%	0.14%	+5.91%

Volatility

XAR vs. USDX - Volatility Comparison

SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF (XAR) has a higher volatility of 9.76% compared to SGI Enhanced Core ETF (USDX) at 0.98%. This indicates that XAR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than USDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XAR	USDX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.76%	0.98%	+8.78%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	22.50%	1.73%	+20.77%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	26.90%	1.93%	+24.97%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.43%	1.68%	+21.75%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.63%	1.68%	+22.95%

XAR vs. USDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

XAR has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than USDX's 0.98% expense ratio.

Dividends

XAR vs. USDX - Dividend Comparison

XAR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.31%, less than USDX's 5.90% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
USDX SGI Enhanced Core ETF	5.90%	5.88%	4.60%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
XAR SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF	0.31%	0.40%	0.66%	0.54%	0.50%	0.83%	0.63%	0.75%	1.19%	0.76%	1.09%	2.31%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XAR and USDX in my portfolio?

XAR and USDX have a correlation of -0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, XAR or USDX?

XAR has higher volatility (9.76%) compared to USDX (0.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XAR dropped -46.37% vs USDX's -0.94%.

Which ETF is better, XAR or USDX?

On 1-year performance, XAR leads with 44.15% vs 5.97% for USDX. On fees, XAR is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, USDX has been the lower-risk option at 0.98%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, XAR or USDX?

Over the 1-year period, XAR has performed better with a 44.15% return vs 5.97%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, XAR or USDX?

XAR is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.98% for USDX.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, XAR or USDX?

USDX has the higher dividend yield at 5.90%, compared with 0.31% for XAR.

What is the main difference between XAR and USDX?

XAR is categorized as Aerospace & Defense, while USDX is Intermediate Core Bond. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Summit Global Investments. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XAR and 0.98% for USDX.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

USDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.11 vs 1.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.