XAR vs. QQWZ

Last updated Jun 16, 2026

XAR (SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF) and QQWZ (Pacer Cash COWZ 100-Nasdaq 100 Rotator ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XAR is a Aerospace & Defense fund tracking the S&P Aerospace & Defense Select Industry Index, while QQWZ is a Nasdaq-100 fund actively managed by Pacer. XAR is passively managed, while QQWZ is actively managed. Over the past year, XAR returned 43.50% vs 37.64% for QQWZ. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XAR charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for QQWZ.

Performance

XAR vs. QQWZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF (XAR) and Pacer Cash COWZ 100-Nasdaq 100 Rotator ETF (QQWZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XAR achieves a 17.27% return, which is significantly lower than QQWZ's 18.65% return.

XAR

• 1D: 1.01%
• 1M: 8.46%
• YTD: 17.27%
• 6M: 20.79%
• 1Y: 43.50%
• 3Y*: 33.67%
• 5Y*: 16.88%
• 10Y*: 18.51%

QQWZ

• 1D: 2.92%
• 1M: 4.75%
• YTD: 18.65%
• 6M: 18.53%
• 1Y: 37.64%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XAR vs. QQWZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
XAR SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF	17.27%	37.93%
QQWZ Pacer Cash COWZ 100-Nasdaq 100 Rotator ETF	18.65%	26.23%

Correlation

The correlation between XAR and QQWZ is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.50
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 7, 2025	0.51

The correlation between XAR and QQWZ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.50 to 0.51 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

XAR vs. QQWZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XAR

XAR Risk / Return Rank: 50
XAR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 50
XAR Sortino Ratio Rank: 51
XAR Omega Ratio Rank: 44
XAR Calmar Ratio Rank: 56
XAR Martin Ratio Rank: 47

QQWZ

QQWZ Risk / Return Rank: 85
QQWZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
QQWZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 80
QQWZ Omega Ratio Rank: 83
QQWZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
QQWZ Martin Ratio Rank: 87

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XAR vs. QQWZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF (XAR) and Pacer Cash COWZ 100-Nasdaq 100 Rotator ETF (QQWZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	XAR	QQWZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.57	2.50	-0.93
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.27	3.25	-0.98
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	1.46	-0.20
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.54	4.84	-2.30
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.11	16.83	-9.71

XAR vs. QQWZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XAR Sharpe Ratio is 1.57, which is lower than the QQWZ Sharpe Ratio of 2.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XAR and QQWZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

XAR vs. QQWZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XAR drawdown since its inception was -46.37%, which is greater than QQWZ's maximum drawdown of -7.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XAR and QQWZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	XAR	QQWZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-46.37%	-7.81%	-38.56%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.22%	-7.81%	-9.41%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.73%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-32.40%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-46.37%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.36%	-0.46%	-2.90%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.78%	-1.43%	-5.35%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.13%	2.24%	+3.89%

Volatility

XAR vs. QQWZ - Volatility Comparison

SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF (XAR) has a higher volatility of 11.49% compared to Pacer Cash COWZ 100-Nasdaq 100 Rotator ETF (QQWZ) at 7.59%. This indicates that XAR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQWZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XAR	QQWZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.49%	7.59%	+3.90%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	23.47%	11.09%	+12.38%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	27.91%	15.17%	+12.74%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.68%	15.39%	+8.29%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.75%	15.39%	+9.36%

XAR vs. QQWZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

XAR has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than QQWZ's 0.49% expense ratio.

Dividends

XAR vs. QQWZ - Dividend Comparison

XAR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.31%, less than QQWZ's 0.55% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
QQWZ Pacer Cash COWZ 100-Nasdaq 100 Rotator ETF	0.55%	0.11%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
XAR SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF	0.31%	0.40%	0.66%	0.54%	0.50%	0.83%	0.63%	0.75%	1.19%	0.76%	1.09%	2.31%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XAR and QQWZ in my portfolio?

XAR and QQWZ have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, XAR or QQWZ?

XAR has higher volatility (11.49%) compared to QQWZ (7.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XAR dropped -46.37% vs QQWZ's -7.81%.

Which ETF is better, XAR or QQWZ?

On 1-year performance, XAR leads with 43.50% vs 37.64% for QQWZ. On fees, XAR is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, QQWZ has been the lower-risk option at 7.59%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, XAR or QQWZ?

Over the 1-year period, XAR has performed better with a 43.50% return vs 37.64%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, XAR or QQWZ?

XAR is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for QQWZ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, XAR or QQWZ?

QQWZ has the higher dividend yield at 0.55%, compared with 0.31% for XAR.

What is the main difference between XAR and QQWZ?

XAR is categorized as Aerospace & Defense, while QQWZ is Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XAR and 0.49% for QQWZ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QQWZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.50 vs 1.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.