XAR vs. IDEF
XAR (SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF) and IDEF (iShares Defense Industrials Active ETF) are both Aerospace & Defense funds. XAR is passively managed, while IDEF is actively managed. Over the past year, XAR returned 41.33% vs 21.86% for IDEF. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. XAR charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for IDEF.
Performance
XAR vs. IDEF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XAR achieves a 13.40% return, which is significantly higher than IDEF's 4.74% return.
XAR
- 1D
- -2.08%
- 1M
- 7.34%
- YTD
- 13.40%
- 6M
- 20.10%
- 1Y
- 41.33%
- 3Y*
- 34.11%
- 5Y*
- 16.26%
- 10Y*
- 18.01%
IDEF
- 1D
- -2.54%
- 1M
- -2.65%
- YTD
- 4.74%
- 6M
- 9.45%
- 1Y
- 21.86%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XAR vs. IDEF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
XAR SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF | 13.40% | 31.00% |
IDEF iShares Defense Industrials Active ETF | 4.74% | 23.05% |
Correlation
The correlation between XAR and IDEF is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 22, 2025 | 0.89 |
The correlation between XAR and IDEF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XAR vs. IDEF — Risk / Return Rank
XAR
IDEF
XAR vs. IDEF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF (XAR) and iShares Defense Industrials Active ETF (IDEF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XAR | IDEF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.51 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.65 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.18 | +0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.41 | 1.50 | +0.91 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.85 | 3.90 | +2.95 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XAR | IDEF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.55 | 1.04 | +0.51 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.70 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.73 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.85 | 1.33 | -0.49 |
Drawdowns
XAR vs. IDEF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XAR drawdown since its inception was -46.37%, which is greater than IDEF's maximum drawdown of -14.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XAR and IDEF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XAR | IDEF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -46.37% | -14.63% | -31.74% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.22% | -14.63% | -2.59% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.73% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.40% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -46.37% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.55% | -12.31% | +5.76% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.79% | -3.90% | -2.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.05% | 5.61% | +0.44% |
Volatility
XAR vs. IDEF - Volatility Comparison
SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF (XAR) has a higher volatility of 9.52% compared to iShares Defense Industrials Active ETF (IDEF) at 7.87%. This indicates that XAR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IDEF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XAR | IDEF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.52% | 7.87% | +1.65% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.39% | 17.98% | +4.41% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.81% | 21.15% | +5.66% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.41% | 21.07% | +2.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.62% | 21.07% | +3.55% |
XAR vs. IDEF - Expense Ratio Comparison
XAR has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than IDEF's 0.55% expense ratio.
Dividends
XAR vs. IDEF - Dividend Comparison
XAR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.32%, more than IDEF's 0.16% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IDEF iShares Defense Industrials Active ETF | 0.16% | 0.17% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XAR SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF | 0.32% | 0.40% | 0.66% | 0.54% | 0.50% | 0.83% | 0.63% | 0.75% | 1.19% | 0.76% | 1.09% | 2.31% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XAR and IDEF have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XAR has higher volatility (9.52%) compared to IDEF (7.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XAR dropped -46.37% vs IDEF's -14.63%.
On 1-year performance, XAR leads with 41.33% vs 21.86% for IDEF. On fees, XAR is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, IDEF has been the lower-risk option at 7.87%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, XAR has performed better with a 41.33% return vs 21.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XAR is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for IDEF.
XAR has the higher dividend yield at 0.32%, compared with 0.16% for IDEF.
They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XAR and 0.55% for IDEF.
XAR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.55 vs 1.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XAR and IDEF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer