PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XAR vs. GLD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XAR vs. GLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF (XAR) and SPDR Gold Shares (GLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XAR achieves a 13.40% return, which is significantly higher than GLD's 2.92% return. Over the past 10 years, XAR has outperformed GLD with an annualized return of 18.01%, while GLD has yielded a comparatively lower 13.12% annualized return.


XAR

1D
-2.08%
1M
7.34%
YTD
13.40%
6M
20.10%
1Y
41.33%
3Y*
34.11%
5Y*
16.26%
10Y*
18.01%

GLD

1D
-0.99%
1M
-1.65%
YTD
2.92%
6M
5.43%
1Y
32.04%
3Y*
31.09%
5Y*
18.15%
10Y*
13.12%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XAR vs. GLD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XAR
SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF
13.40%46.15%23.32%23.79%-5.02%2.31%6.18%39.33%-4.58%33.00%
GLD
SPDR Gold Shares
2.92%63.68%26.66%12.69%-0.77%-4.15%24.81%17.86%-1.94%12.81%

Correlation

The correlation between XAR and GLD is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.26

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.20

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.17

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.08

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2011

0.05

Over the past year, XAR and GLD have become more correlated (0.26) than their long-term average of 0.05, meaning their price movements have been converging.

XAR vs. GLD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XAR
GLD

Industrials

99.4%

-

Technology

0.5%

-

Basic Materials

-

100.0%

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Industrials

XAR
99.4%
GLD

-

Technology

XAR
0.5%
GLD

-

Basic Materials

XAR

-

GLD
100.0%

Communication Services

XAR

-

GLD

-

Consumer Cyclical

XAR

-

GLD

-

Consumer Defensive

XAR

-

GLD

-

Energy

XAR

-

GLD

-

Financial Services

XAR

-

GLD

-

Healthcare

XAR

-

GLD

-

Real Estate

XAR

-

GLD

-

Utilities

XAR

-

GLD

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XAR vs. GLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XAR
XAR Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
XAR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XAR Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
XAR Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
XAR Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
XAR Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

GLD
GLD Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
GLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLD Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
GLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLD Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XAR vs. GLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF (XAR) and SPDR Gold Shares (GLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XARGLDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.34

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.61

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.24

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.41

1.68

+0.74

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.85

4.15

+2.70

XAR vs. GLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XAR Sharpe Ratio is 1.55, which is comparable to the GLD Sharpe Ratio of 1.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XAR and GLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XARGLDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.55

1.21

+0.34

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

1.01

-0.32

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.73

0.83

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.85

0.60

+0.25

Drawdowns

XAR vs. GLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XAR drawdown since its inception was -46.37%, roughly equal to the maximum GLD drawdown of -45.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XAR and GLD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XARGLDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.37%

-45.56%

-0.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.22%

-19.21%

+1.99%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.73%

-19.21%

-0.52%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.40%

-21.03%

-11.37%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.37%

-22.00%

-24.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.55%

-17.75%

+11.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.79%

-16.16%

+9.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.05%

7.73%

-1.68%

Volatility

XAR vs. GLD - Volatility Comparison

SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF (XAR) has a higher volatility of 9.52% compared to SPDR Gold Shares (GLD) at 5.51%. This indicates that XAR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XARGLDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.52%

5.51%

+4.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.39%

23.16%

-0.77%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.81%

26.61%

+0.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.41%

18.00%

+5.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.62%

15.95%

+8.67%

XAR vs. GLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

XAR has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than GLD's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

XAR vs. GLD - Dividend Comparison

XAR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.32%, while GLD has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GLD
SPDR Gold Shares
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XAR
SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF
0.32%0.40%0.66%0.54%0.50%0.83%0.63%0.75%1.19%0.76%1.09%2.31%

Frequently Asked Questions


XAR and GLD have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XAR has higher volatility (9.52%) compared to GLD (5.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XAR dropped -46.37% vs GLD's -45.56%.

On 10-year performance, XAR leads with 18.01% vs 13.12% for GLD. On fees, XAR is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, GLD has been the lower-risk option at 5.51%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, XAR has performed better with a 18.01% return vs 13.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XAR is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for GLD.

XAR has the higher dividend yield at 0.32%, compared with 0.00% for GLD.

XAR is categorized as Aerospace & Defense, while GLD is Gold. XAR tracks S&P Aerospace & Defense Select Industry Index, while GLD tracks LBMA Gold Price PM. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XAR and 0.40% for GLD.

XAR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.55 vs 1.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XAR and GLD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer