XAR vs. GLD
XAR (SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF) and GLD (SPDR Gold Shares) are both exchange-traded funds - XAR is a Aerospace & Defense fund tracking the S&P Aerospace & Defense Select Industry Index, while GLD is a Gold fund tracking the LBMA Gold Price PM. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XAR returned 18.01%/yr vs 13.12%/yr for GLD. At a 0.05 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XAR charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for GLD.
Performance
XAR vs. GLD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XAR achieves a 13.40% return, which is significantly higher than GLD's 2.92% return. Over the past 10 years, XAR has outperformed GLD with an annualized return of 18.01%, while GLD has yielded a comparatively lower 13.12% annualized return.
XAR
- 1D
- -2.08%
- 1M
- 7.34%
- YTD
- 13.40%
- 6M
- 20.10%
- 1Y
- 41.33%
- 3Y*
- 34.11%
- 5Y*
- 16.26%
- 10Y*
- 18.01%
GLD
- 1D
- -0.99%
- 1M
- -1.65%
- YTD
- 2.92%
- 6M
- 5.43%
- 1Y
- 32.04%
- 3Y*
- 31.09%
- 5Y*
- 18.15%
- 10Y*
- 13.12%
XAR vs. GLD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XAR SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF | 13.40% | 46.15% | 23.32% | 23.79% | -5.02% | 2.31% | 6.18% | 39.33% | -4.58% | 33.00% |
GLD SPDR Gold Shares | 2.92% | 63.68% | 26.66% | 12.69% | -0.77% | -4.15% | 24.81% | 17.86% | -1.94% | 12.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between XAR and GLD is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2011 | 0.05 |
Over the past year, XAR and GLD have become more correlated (0.26) than their long-term average of 0.05, meaning their price movements have been converging.
XAR vs. GLD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XAR
GLD
Industrials
-
Technology
-
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Industrials
XAR
GLD
-
Technology
XAR
GLD
-
Basic Materials
XAR
-
GLD
Communication Services
XAR
-
GLD
-
Consumer Cyclical
XAR
-
GLD
-
Consumer Defensive
XAR
-
GLD
-
Energy
XAR
-
GLD
-
Financial Services
XAR
-
GLD
-
Healthcare
XAR
-
GLD
-
Real Estate
XAR
-
GLD
-
Utilities
XAR
-
GLD
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XAR vs. GLD — Risk / Return Rank
XAR
GLD
XAR vs. GLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF (XAR) and SPDR Gold Shares (GLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XAR | GLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.34 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.61 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.24 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.41 | 1.68 | +0.74 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.85 | 4.15 | +2.70 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XAR | GLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.55 | 1.21 | +0.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.70 | 1.01 | -0.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.73 | 0.83 | -0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.85 | 0.60 | +0.25 |
Drawdowns
XAR vs. GLD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XAR drawdown since its inception was -46.37%, roughly equal to the maximum GLD drawdown of -45.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XAR and GLD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XAR | GLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -46.37% | -45.56% | -0.81% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.22% | -19.21% | +1.99% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.73% | -19.21% | -0.52% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.40% | -21.03% | -11.37% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -46.37% | -22.00% | -24.37% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.55% | -17.75% | +11.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.79% | -16.16% | +9.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.05% | 7.73% | -1.68% |
Volatility
XAR vs. GLD - Volatility Comparison
SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF (XAR) has a higher volatility of 9.52% compared to SPDR Gold Shares (GLD) at 5.51%. This indicates that XAR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XAR | GLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.52% | 5.51% | +4.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.39% | 23.16% | -0.77% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.81% | 26.61% | +0.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.41% | 18.00% | +5.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.62% | 15.95% | +8.67% |
XAR vs. GLD - Expense Ratio Comparison
XAR has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than GLD's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
XAR vs. GLD - Dividend Comparison
XAR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.32%, while GLD has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLD SPDR Gold Shares | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XAR SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF | 0.32% | 0.40% | 0.66% | 0.54% | 0.50% | 0.83% | 0.63% | 0.75% | 1.19% | 0.76% | 1.09% | 2.31% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XAR and GLD have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XAR has higher volatility (9.52%) compared to GLD (5.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XAR dropped -46.37% vs GLD's -45.56%.
On 10-year performance, XAR leads with 18.01% vs 13.12% for GLD. On fees, XAR is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, GLD has been the lower-risk option at 5.51%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, XAR has performed better with a 18.01% return vs 13.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XAR is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for GLD.
XAR has the higher dividend yield at 0.32%, compared with 0.00% for GLD.
XAR is categorized as Aerospace & Defense, while GLD is Gold. XAR tracks S&P Aerospace & Defense Select Industry Index, while GLD tracks LBMA Gold Price PM. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XAR and 0.40% for GLD.
XAR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.55 vs 1.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XAR and GLD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer