XAR vs. AVDV
XAR (SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF) and AVDV (Avantis International Small Cap Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XAR is a Aerospace & Defense fund tracking the S&P Aerospace & Defense Select Industry Index, while AVDV is a Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities fund actively managed by Avantis. XAR is passively managed, while AVDV is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, XAR returned 16.58%/yr vs 13.63%/yr for AVDV. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XAR charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.36%/yr for AVDV.
Performance
XAR vs. AVDV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XAR achieves a 16.10% return, which is significantly higher than AVDV's 14.99% return.
XAR
- 1D
- -1.55%
- 1M
- 3.18%
- YTD
- 16.10%
- 6M
- 18.39%
- 1Y
- 42.07%
- 3Y*
- 33.32%
- 5Y*
- 16.58%
- 10Y*
- 18.45%
AVDV
- 1D
- 0.89%
- 1M
- -1.99%
- YTD
- 14.99%
- 6M
- 17.18%
- 1Y
- 41.91%
- 3Y*
- 26.72%
- 5Y*
- 13.63%
- 10Y*
- —
XAR vs. AVDV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XAR SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF | 16.10% | 46.15% | 23.32% | 23.79% | -5.02% | 2.31% | 6.18% | 0.29% |
AVDV Avantis International Small Cap Value ETF | 14.99% | 49.37% | 8.67% | 16.85% | -11.47% | 15.80% | 5.01% | 11.78% |
Correlation
The correlation between XAR and AVDV is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 26, 2019 | 0.61 |
The correlation between XAR and AVDV shifts across timeframes, from 0.51 (3 years) to 0.61 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
XAR vs. AVDV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XAR
AVDV
Industrials
Technology
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Industrials
XAR
AVDV
Technology
XAR
AVDV
Basic Materials
XAR
-
AVDV
Communication Services
XAR
-
AVDV
Consumer Cyclical
XAR
-
AVDV
Consumer Defensive
XAR
-
AVDV
Energy
XAR
-
AVDV
Financial Services
XAR
-
AVDV
Healthcare
XAR
-
AVDV
Real Estate
XAR
-
AVDV
Utilities
XAR
-
AVDV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XAR vs. AVDV — Risk / Return Rank
XAR
AVDV
XAR vs. AVDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF (XAR) and Avantis International Small Cap Value ETF (AVDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XAR | AVDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.03 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.16 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.46 | -0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.43 | 3.12 | -0.69 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.81 | 12.44 | -5.63 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XAR vs. AVDV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XAR drawdown since its inception was -46.37%, which is greater than AVDV's maximum drawdown of -43.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XAR and AVDV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XAR | AVDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -46.37% | -43.01% | -3.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.22% | -13.19% | -4.03% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.73% | -14.17% | -5.56% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.40% | -28.08% | -4.32% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -46.37% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.32% | -2.24% | -2.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.78% | -6.76% | -0.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.13% | 3.30% | +2.83% |
Volatility
XAR vs. AVDV - Volatility Comparison
SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF (XAR) has a higher volatility of 11.46% compared to Avantis International Small Cap Value ETF (AVDV) at 6.26%. This indicates that XAR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AVDV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XAR | AVDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.46% | 6.26% | +5.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.56% | 13.88% | +9.68% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.85% | 16.25% | +11.60% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.66% | 17.41% | +6.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.74% | 19.77% | +4.97% |
XAR vs. AVDV - Expense Ratio Comparison
XAR has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than AVDV's 0.36% expense ratio.
Dividends
XAR vs. AVDV - Dividend Comparison
XAR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.31%, less than AVDV's 4.11% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AVDV Avantis International Small Cap Value ETF | 4.11% | 3.05% | 4.31% | 3.29% | 3.17% | 2.39% | 1.67% | 0.36% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XAR SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF | 0.31% | 0.40% | 0.66% | 0.54% | 0.50% | 0.83% | 0.63% | 0.75% | 1.19% | 0.76% | 1.09% | 2.31% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XAR and AVDV have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XAR has higher volatility (11.46%) compared to AVDV (6.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XAR dropped -46.37% vs AVDV's -43.01%.
On 5-year performance, XAR leads with 16.58% vs 13.63% for AVDV. On fees, XAR is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, AVDV has been the lower-risk option at 6.26%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, XAR has performed better with a 16.58% return vs 13.63%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XAR is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.36% for AVDV.
AVDV has the higher dividend yield at 4.11%, compared with 0.31% for XAR.
XAR is categorized as Aerospace & Defense, while AVDV is Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Avantis. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XAR and 0.36% for AVDV.
AVDV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.53 vs 1.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XAR and AVDV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer