XAR vs. ARKW
XAR (SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF) and ARKW (ARK Next Generation Internet ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XAR is a Aerospace & Defense fund tracking the S&P Aerospace & Defense Select Industry Index, while ARKW is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by ARK. XAR is passively managed, while ARKW is actively managed. Over the past 10 years, XAR returned 18.45%/yr vs 22.51%/yr for ARKW. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XAR charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.76%/yr for ARKW.
Performance
XAR vs. ARKW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XAR achieves a 16.10% return, which is significantly higher than ARKW's -4.37% return. Over the past 10 years, XAR has underperformed ARKW with an annualized return of 18.45%, while ARKW has yielded a comparatively higher 22.51% annualized return.
XAR
- 1D
- -1.55%
- 1M
- 7.38%
- YTD
- 16.10%
- 6M
- 18.39%
- 1Y
- 42.07%
- 3Y*
- 33.32%
- 5Y*
- 16.58%
- 10Y*
- 18.45%
ARKW
- 1D
- 0.87%
- 1M
- -1.28%
- YTD
- -4.37%
- 6M
- -7.45%
- 1Y
- 10.34%
- 3Y*
- 36.42%
- 5Y*
- 0.46%
- 10Y*
- 22.51%
XAR vs. ARKW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XAR SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF | 16.10% | 46.15% | 23.32% | 23.79% | -5.02% | 2.31% | 6.18% | 39.33% | -4.58% | 33.00% |
ARKW ARK Next Generation Internet ETF | -4.37% | 38.93% | 42.27% | 96.89% | -67.49% | -18.85% | 157.44% | 35.76% | 4.24% | 87.29% |
Correlation
The correlation between XAR and ARKW is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2014 | 0.54 |
The correlation between XAR and ARKW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.54 to 0.59 - a consistent structural relationship.
XAR vs. ARKW - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XAR
ARKW
Industrials
Technology
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Industrials
XAR
ARKW
Technology
XAR
ARKW
Basic Materials
XAR
-
ARKW
-
Communication Services
XAR
-
ARKW
Consumer Cyclical
XAR
-
ARKW
Consumer Defensive
XAR
-
ARKW
-
Energy
XAR
-
ARKW
-
Financial Services
XAR
-
ARKW
Healthcare
XAR
-
ARKW
-
Real Estate
XAR
-
ARKW
-
Utilities
XAR
-
ARKW
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XAR vs. ARKW — Risk / Return Rank
XAR
ARKW
XAR vs. ARKW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF (XAR) and ARK Next Generation Internet ETF (ARKW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XAR | ARKW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.18 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.55 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.08 | +0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.43 | 0.29 | +2.14 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.81 | 0.59 | +6.23 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XAR vs. ARKW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XAR drawdown since its inception was -46.37%, smaller than the maximum ARKW drawdown of -80.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XAR and ARKW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XAR | ARKW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -46.37% | -80.52% | +34.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.22% | -36.21% | +18.99% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.73% | -36.21% | +16.48% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.40% | -77.36% | +44.96% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -46.37% | -80.52% | +34.15% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.32% | -23.35% | +19.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.78% | -23.97% | +17.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.13% | 17.89% | -11.76% |
Volatility
XAR vs. ARKW - Volatility Comparison
SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF (XAR) has a higher volatility of 11.46% compared to ARK Next Generation Internet ETF (ARKW) at 10.38%. This indicates that XAR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ARKW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XAR | ARKW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.46% | 10.38% | +1.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.56% | 24.57% | -1.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.85% | 32.92% | -5.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.66% | 43.59% | -19.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.74% | 37.73% | -12.99% |
XAR vs. ARKW - Expense Ratio Comparison
XAR has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than ARKW's 0.76% expense ratio.
Dividends
XAR vs. ARKW - Dividend Comparison
XAR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.31%, less than ARKW's 1.66% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ARKW ARK Next Generation Internet ETF | 1.66% | 1.59% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.17% | 1.29% | 0.00% | 13.05% | 2.05% | 0.00% | 2.29% |
XAR SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF | 0.31% | 0.40% | 0.66% | 0.54% | 0.50% | 0.83% | 0.63% | 0.75% | 1.19% | 0.76% | 1.09% | 2.31% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XAR and ARKW have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XAR has higher volatility (11.46%) compared to ARKW (10.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XAR dropped -46.37% vs ARKW's -80.52%.
On 10-year performance, ARKW leads with 22.51% vs 18.45% for XAR. On fees, XAR is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, ARKW has been the lower-risk option at 10.38%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, ARKW has performed better with a 22.51% return vs 18.45%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XAR is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.76% for ARKW.
ARKW has the higher dividend yield at 1.66%, compared with 0.31% for XAR.
XAR is categorized as Aerospace & Defense, while ARKW is Mid Cap Growth Equities. They also come from different issuers: State Street and ARK. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XAR and 0.76% for ARKW.
XAR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.50 vs 0.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XAR and ARKW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer