XAPR vs. IWMY

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

XAPR (FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - April) and IWMY (Defiance R2000 Enhanced Options & 0DTE Income ETF) are both Options Trading funds. XAPR is actively managed, while IWMY is passively managed. Over the past year, XAPR returned 7.78% vs 21.86% for IWMY. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XAPR charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for IWMY.

Performance

XAPR vs. IWMY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - April (XAPR) and Defiance R2000 Enhanced Options & 0DTE Income ETF (IWMY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XAPR achieves a 2.92% return, which is significantly lower than IWMY's 14.94% return.

XAPR

• 1D: -0.39%
• 1M: -0.09%
• YTD: 2.92%
• 6M: 3.02%
• 1Y: 7.78%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

IWMY

• 1D: -0.81%
• 1M: 3.35%
• YTD: 14.94%
• 6M: 12.52%
• 1Y: 21.86%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XAPR vs. IWMY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
XAPR FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - April	2.92%	12.57%	8.57%
IWMY Defiance R2000 Enhanced Options & 0DTE Income ETF	14.94%	10.18%	7.48%

Correlation

The correlation between XAPR and IWMY is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.62
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 22, 2024	0.66

The correlation between XAPR and IWMY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.62 to 0.66 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

XAPR vs. IWMY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XAPR

XAPR Risk / Return Rank: 95
XAPR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
XAPR Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
XAPR Omega Ratio Rank: 96
XAPR Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
XAPR Martin Ratio Rank: 97

IWMY

IWMY Risk / Return Rank: 39
IWMY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 39
IWMY Sortino Ratio Rank: 37
IWMY Omega Ratio Rank: 36
IWMY Calmar Ratio Rank: 39
IWMY Martin Ratio Rank: 41

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XAPR vs. IWMY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - April (XAPR) and Defiance R2000 Enhanced Options & 0DTE Income ETF (IWMY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	XAPR	IWMY	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.28	1.34	+1.94
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	5.06	1.84	+3.22
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.79	1.23	+0.56
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	6.13	1.90	+4.24
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	42.73	6.20	+36.54

XAPR vs. IWMY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XAPR Sharpe Ratio is 3.28, which is higher than the IWMY Sharpe Ratio of 1.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XAPR and IWMY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

XAPR vs. IWMY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XAPR drawdown since its inception was -6.18%, smaller than the maximum IWMY drawdown of -18.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XAPR and IWMY.

Drawdown Indicators

	XAPR	IWMY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-6.18%	-18.72%	+12.54%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.27%	-11.57%	+10.30%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.66%	-0.81%	+0.15%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.18%	-2.94%	+2.76%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.18%	3.54%	-3.36%

Volatility

XAPR vs. IWMY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - April (XAPR) is 1.53%, while Defiance R2000 Enhanced Options & 0DTE Income ETF (IWMY) has a volatility of 6.20%. This indicates that XAPR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IWMY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XAPR	IWMY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.53%	6.20%	-4.67%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.95%	13.55%	-11.60%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.39%	16.37%	-13.98%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.18%	15.95%	-9.77%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	6.18%	15.95%	-9.77%

XAPR vs. IWMY - Expense Ratio Comparison

XAPR has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than IWMY's 0.99% expense ratio.

Dividends

XAPR vs. IWMY - Dividend Comparison

XAPR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IWMY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 43.75%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
IWMY Defiance R2000 Enhanced Options & 0DTE Income ETF	43.75%	63.33%	107.92%	11.34%
XAPR FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - April	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XAPR and IWMY in my portfolio?

XAPR and IWMY have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, XAPR or IWMY?

IWMY has higher volatility (6.20%) compared to XAPR (1.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XAPR dropped -6.18% vs IWMY's -18.72%.

Which ETF is better, XAPR or IWMY?

On 1-year performance, IWMY leads with 21.86% vs 7.78% for XAPR. On fees, XAPR is cheaper at 0.85% per year. On volatility, XAPR has been the lower-risk option at 1.53%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, XAPR or IWMY?

Over the 1-year period, IWMY has performed better with a 21.86% return vs 7.78%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, XAPR or IWMY?

XAPR is cheaper with a 0.85% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for IWMY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, XAPR or IWMY?

IWMY has the higher dividend yield at 43.75%, compared with 0.00% for XAPR.

What is the main difference between XAPR and IWMY?

They also come from different issuers: FT Vest and Defiance. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for XAPR and 0.99% for IWMY.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

XAPR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.28 vs 1.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.